Homilies on the Epistle to the Romans — Homily 31

Homily 31 of 32 on St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans.

Source: Translated by J. Walker, J. Sheppard and H. Browne, and revised by George B. Stevens. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series , Vol. 11. Edited by Philip Schaff. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1889. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/210231.htm>.

Opening

Romans 16:5

Rom. XVI. 5

Greet my beloved Epenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia for Christ.

Salute my well-beloved Epenetus, who is the first-fruits of Achaia unto Christ.

I believe that many people, even those who seem to be extremely good, rush past this section of the Epistle as if it were unnecessary and carried little weight. I think the same thing happens to them with the genealogy in the Gospel. Because it is a list of names, they assume they cannot gain much benefit from it. Yet gold refiners are careful even about tiny fragments, while these people pass over such large pieces of gold. To prevent this from happening to them, what I have already said should be enough to shake them from their laziness. We have already shown from previous discussions that the benefit even from this section is not insignificant, when we lifted up your soul through those addresses. So today we will try to mine in this same place again. It is possible to find a great treasure even from bare names. If, for example, you were shown why Abraham was so called, why Sarah, why Israel, why Samuel, you would discover from this many real subjects worth investigating. You can gather the same advantage from times and places as well. The good person becomes rich even from these things, but the lazy person does not gain anything even from the most obvious matters. The very name of Adam teaches us considerable wisdom, as do the names of his son, his wife, and most of the others. Names serve to remind us of many circumstances. They reveal at once God's blessings and women's thankfulness, for when they conceived by God's gift, it was the women who gave these names to the children. But why are we now reflecting on names when so many important meanings are being neglected, and many people do not even know the names of the sacred books themselves? Still, we ought not to withdraw from paying attention to matters like this. For "you ought," He says, "to have put My money to the exchangers." Therefore, even if no one listens, let us do our part and demonstrate that there is nothing superfluous, nothing added randomly in the Scriptures. If these names served no purpose, they would not have been added to the Epistle, nor would Paul have written what he wrote. But some people are so small-minded, empty, and unworthy of Heaven that they think not only names but whole books of the Bible are useless—like Leviticus, Joshua, and others. In this way many simple-minded people have been led to reject the Old Testament, and advancing further along this evil path, they have likewise cut away many parts of the New Testament as well. But we do not pay much attention to these people, who are intoxicated and living for the flesh. However, if anyone loves wisdom and enjoys spiritual instruction, let him be told that even the things that seem unimportant in Scripture are not placed there randomly or without purpose, and that even the old laws have much to teach us. For it says, "All these things are types and are written for our instruction." This is why Paul also says to Timothy, "Give heed to reading, to exhortation," urging him to read the old books, even though Timothy had such great spiritual power that he could drive out demons and raise the dead. Now let us continue with the subject at hand. "Salute my well-beloved Epenetus." It is worth learning from this how Paul distributes different praises to each person. This praise is no small thing but is actually very great, and proof of great excellence in Epenetus—that Paul should consider him beloved, Paul who never loved out of favoritism but only by sound judgment. Then comes another commendation: "Who is the first-fruits of Achaia." What he means is either that Epenetus leaped forward before anyone else and became a believer (which would be no small praise), or that he displayed more godly behavior than anyone else. That is why, after saying "who is the first-fruits of Achaia," Paul does not stop there but, to prevent you from thinking this is worldly glory, adds "unto Christ." Now if in civil matters the person who is first seems great and honorable, how much more so in these matters. Since they were likely of humble origin, Paul speaks of the true noble birth and preeminence, giving Epenetus his honors from this. Paul says he is the first-fruits not only of Corinth but of the whole nation, as if he had become a door and entrance for the rest. The reward for such a person is not small, for he will receive much recompense from the achievements of others as well, since he contributed much toward them by being first.

I think that many even of those who have the appearance of being extremely good men, hasten over this part of the Epistle as superfluous, and having no great weight in it. And I think that the same befalls them in regard to the genealogy that is in the Gospel. For because it is a catalogue of names, they think they cannot get any great good from it. Yet the gold founders' people are careful even about the little fragments; while these pass over even such great cakes of gold. That this then may not befall them, what I have already said were enough to lead them off from their listlessness. For that the gain even from this is no contemptible one, we have shown even from what was said on a former occasion, when we lifted up your soul by means of these addresses. We will endeavor then today also to mine in this same place. For it is possible even from bare names to find a great treasure. If, for instance, you were shown why Abraham was so called, why Sarah, why Israel, why Samuel, you would find even from this a great many real subjects of research. And from times too, and from places, you may gather the same advantage. For the good man waxes rich even from these; but he that is slothful, does not gain even from the most evident things. Thus the very name of Adam teaches us no small wisdom, and that of his son, and of his wife, and most of the others. For names serve to remind us of several circumstances. They show at once God's benefits and women's thankfulness. For when they conceived by the gift of God, it was they who gave these names to the children. But why are we now philosophizing about names, while meanings so important are neglected, and many do not so much as know the very names of the sacred books? Still even then we ought not to recede from an attention to things of this sort. For you ought, He says, to have put My money to the exchangers. Matthew 25:27 And therefore though there be nobody that listens to it, let us do our part, and show that there is nothing superfluous, nothing added at random in the Scriptures. For if these names had no use, they would not then have been added to the Epistle, nor would Paul have written what he has written. But there are some even so low-minded, and empty, and unworthy of Heaven, as not to think that names only, but whole books of the Bible are of no use, as Leviticus, Joshua, and more besides. And in this way many of the simple ones have been for rejecting the Old Testament, and advancing on in the way, that results from this evil habit of mind, have likewise pruned away many parts of the New Testament also. But of these men, as intoxicated and living to the flesh, we do not make much account. But if any be a lover of wisdom, and a friend to spiritual entertainments, let him be told that even the things which seem to be unimportant in Scripture, are not placed there at random and to no purpose, and that even the old laws have much to profit us. For it says, All these things are types (A.V. ensamples) and are written for our instruction. 1 Corinthians 10:11 Wherefore to Timothy too he says, Give heed to reading, to exhortation 1 Timothy 4:13, so urging him to the reading of the old books, though he was a man with so great a spirit in him, as to be able to drive out devils, and to raise the dead. Let us now keep on with the subject in hand. Salute my well-beloved Epenetus. It is worth learning from this how he distributes to each the different praises. For this praise is no slight one, but even very great, and a proof of great excellence in him, that Paul should hold him beloved, Paul who had no idea of loving by favor, and not by cool judgment. Then another encomium comes, Who is the first-fruits of Achaia. For what he means is, either that he leaped forward before any one else, and became a believer (and this were no slight praise), or that he displayed more religious behavior than any other. And on this account after saying, who is the first-fruits of Achaia, he does not hold his peace, but to prevent your suspecting it to be a glory of the world's, he added, unto Christ. Now if in civil matters, he that is first seems to be great and honorable, much more so in these. As then it was likely that they were of low extraction, he speaks of the true noble birth and preëminency, and gives him his honors from this. And he says, that he is the first-fruits, not of Corinth only, but of the whole nation, as having become as it were a door, and an entrance to the rest. And to such, the reward is no small one. For such an one will reap much recompense also from the achievements of others, in that he too contributed much toward them by beginning.

Verse 6. Greet Mary, who worked very hard for us.

Ver. 6. Greet Mary, who bestowed much labor on us.

How is this? A woman is honored and proclaimed victorious again! Again we men are put to shame. Or rather, we are not just put to shame, but even have an honor conferred upon us. For it is an honor that there are such women among us, but we are put to shame because we men are left so far behind by them. But if we understand where their adornment comes from, we too can quickly catch up to them. Where then does their adornment come from? Let both men and women listen. It does not come from bracelets or necklaces, nor from their eunuchs, maidservants, and gold-embroidered dresses, but from their labors on behalf of the truth. For he says she bestowed much labor on us—that is, not only on herself or her own advancement (for many women today do this by fasting and sleeping on the floor), but also on others, thus running the same race that Apostles and Evangelists ran. In what sense then does he say, "I do not permit a woman to teach"? He means to prevent her from coming forward publicly and from the seat on the bema, not from the word of teaching. For if this were the case, how could he have said to the woman who had an unbelieving husband, "How do you know, O woman, if you will save your husband?" Or how could he allow her to instruct children, when he says, "but she will be saved through childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control"? How did Priscilla come to instruct even Apollos? It was not then to cut off private conversation for edification that he said this, but rather what is given before all in the public assembly, which it is the teacher's duty to give; or again, in case the husband is a believer and thoroughly equipped, able also to instruct her. When she is the wiser, then he does not forbid her from teaching and improving him. And he does not say "who taught much," but "who bestowed much labor," because along with teaching she performed other ministries besides—those involving dangers, money, and travels. For the women of those days were more spirited than lions, sharing with the Apostles their labors for the Gospel's sake. In this way they traveled with them and also performed all other ministries. And even in Christ's day, women followed Him who ministered to Him from their resources and waited upon the Teacher.

How is this? A woman again is honored and proclaimed victorious! Again are we men put to shame. Or rather, we are not put to shame only, but have even an honor conferred upon us. For an honor we have, in that there are such women among us, but we are put to shame, in that we men are left so far behind by them. But if we come to know whence it comes, that they are so adorned, we too shall speedily overtake them. Whence then is their adorning? Let both men and women listen. It is not from bracelets, or from necklaces, nor from their eunuchs either, and their maid-servants, and gold-broidered dresses, but from their toils in behalf of the truth. For he says, who bestowed much labor on us, that is, not on herself only, nor upon her own advancement, (see p. 520) (for this many women of the present day do, by fasting, and sleeping on the floor), but upon others also, so carrying on the race Apostles and Evangelists ran. In what sense then does he say, I suffer not a woman to teach? 1 Timothy 2:12 He means to hinder her from publicly coming forward 1 Corinthians 14:35, and from the seat on the bema, not from the word of teaching. Since if this were the case, how would he have said to the woman that had an unbelieving husband, How do you know, O woman, if you shall save your husband? 1 Corinthians 7:16 Or how came he to allow her to admonish children, when he says, but she shall be saved by child-bearing if they continue in faith, and charity, and holiness, with sobriety? 1 Timothy 2:15 How came Priscilla to instruct even Apollos? It was not then to cut in sunder private conversing for advantage that he said this, but that before all, and which it was the teacher's duty to give in the public assembly; or again, in case the husband be believing and thoroughly furnished, able also to instruct her. When she is the wiser, then he does not forbid her teaching and improving him. And he does not say, who taught much, but who bestowed much labor, because along with teaching ( τοὓ λόγου) she performs other ministries besides, those in the way of dangers, in the way of money, in the way of travels. For the women of those days were more spirited than lions, sharing with the Apostles their labors for the Gospel's sake. In this way they went travelling with them, and also performed all other ministries. And even in Christ's day there followed Him women, which ministered unto Him of their substance Luke 8:3, and waited upon the Teacher.

Greet Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen.

Ver. 7. Salute Andronicus and Junia my kinsmen.

This also appears to be a statement of praise. What comes next is even more praiseworthy. And what kind of praise is this? "And my fellow-prisoners." This is the highest honor, a noble declaration. When was Paul a prisoner, that he could call them his fellow-prisoners? In fact, he had not been imprisoned, but he had suffered things worse than prisoners endure—being separated not only from his country and family, but also wrestling with hunger and constant threat of death, along with thousands of other hardships. A prisoner's only misfortune is being separated from relatives and often being enslaved rather than free. But in Paul's case, one could point to trials as numerous as snowflakes, which this blessed person endured by being carried about from place to place, whipped, chained, stoned, shipwrecked, with countless people plotting against him. Captives usually have no further enemy after being led away and actually receive considerable care from their captors. But this man was continually surrounded by enemies and saw spears on every side, along with sharpened swords, battle lines, and conflicts. Since these people likely shared many dangers with him, he calls them fellow-captives, just as in another passage he mentions "Aristarchus my fellow-prisoner." Then comes another praise besides this: "Who are of note among the Apostles." Indeed, to be apostles at all is a great thing. But to be especially distinguished even among the apostles—just consider what a magnificent praise this is! They were distinguished because of their works and their accomplishments. Oh, how great is the philosophia of this woman, that she should even be considered worthy of the title of apostle! But he does not stop even here; he adds yet another praise, saying, "Who were also in Christ before me."

This also looks like an encomium. And what follows is much more so. And what sort is this of? And my fellow-prisoners. For this is the greatest honor, the noble proclamation. And where was Paul a prisoner, that he should call them my fellow-prisoners? A prisoner indeed he had not been, but he had suffered things worse than prisoners, in being not an alien only to his country and his family, but in wrestling with famine and continual death, and thousands of other things. For of a prisoner the only misfortune is this, that he is separated from his relations, and often has to be a slave instead of being free. But in this case one may mention temptations thick as snow-flakes, which this blessed person underwent by being carried and taken about, scourged, fettered, stoned, shipwrecked, with countless people plotting against him. And captives indeed have no further foe after they are led away, but they even experience great care from those who have taken them. But this man was continually in the midst of enemies, and saw spears on every side, and sharpened swords, and arrays, and battles. Since then it was likely that these shared many dangers with him, he calls them fellow-captives. As in another passage also, Aristarchus my fellow-prisoner. Colossians 4:10 Then another praise besides. Who are of note among the Apostles. And indeed to be apostles at all is a great thing. But to be even among these of note, just consider what a great encomium this is! But they were of note owing to their works, to their achievements. Oh! How great is the devotion ( φιλοσοφία) of this woman, that she should be even counted worthy of the appellation of apostle! But even here he does not stop, but adds another encomium besides, and says, Who were also in Christ before me.

This too is high praise: that they came forward and arrived before others. But notice the holy soul, how free it is from vanity. For after achieving glory of this kind and degree, he places others ahead of himself and does not hide from us the fact that he came after them, nor is he ashamed to admit this. And why should you be surprised that he is not ashamed of this, when he does not even hesitate to display his former life before people, calling himself a blasphemer and a persecutor? 1 Timothy 1:13 Since he could not place them ahead of others on this basis, he considered himself, who had come in after others, and from this he found a way to give them praise by saying, Who were in Christ before me.

For this too is a very great praise, that they sprang forth and came before others. But let me draw your attention to the holy soul, how untainted it is by vanity. For after glory such as his in kind and degree, he sets others before himself, and does not hide from us the fact of his having come after them, nor is ashamed of confessing this. And why are you surprised at his not being ashamed of this, when he shuns not even to parade before men his former life, calling himself a blasphemer, and a persecutor? 1 Timothy 1:13 Since then he was not able to set them before others on this score, he looked out himself, who had come in after others, and from this he did find means of bestowing a praise upon them by saying, Who were in Christ before me.

Verse 8. Greet Amplias my beloved.

Ver. 8. Greet Amplias my beloved.

Here again he praises this person through his love. For Paul's love was directed toward God and brought countless blessings with it. For if being loved by a king is a great thing, what a great praise it must be to be beloved by Paul! For if Amplias had not acquired great virtue, he would not have attracted Paul's love. Since Paul is accustomed (οἶδε) not only to withhold his love from those who live in vice and transgressions, but even to anathematize them. As when he says, "If any man love not the Lord Jesus, let him be accursed" (1 Corinthians 16:22); and, "If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that you have received, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8).

Here again he passes encomiums upon his person by his love. For the love of Paul was for God, carrying countless blessings with it. For if being loved by the king is a great thing, what a great encomium must it be to be beloved by Paul? For if he had not acquired great virtue, he would not have attracted his love? Since as for those who live in vice and transgressions he is accustomed ( οἶδε) not only to abstain from loving them, but even to anathematize them. As when he says, If any man love not the Lord Jesus, let him be accursed 1 Corinthians 16:22; and, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that you have received, let him be accursed. Galatians 1:8

Verse 9. Greet Urbanus, my fellow worker in the Lord.

Ver. 9. Salute Urbane, my helper in the Lord.

This is a higher praise than the previous one, for it actually includes that earlier praise as well. And Stachys, my beloved. This again is an honor of the same type.

This is a greater encomium than the other. For this even comprehends that. And Stachys, my beloved. This again is an honor of the same kind.

Verse 10. Greet Apelles, approved in Christ.

Ver. 10. Salute Apelles, approved in Christ.

There is no praise like this—being blameless and giving no opportunity for accusation in the things of God. For when he says "approved in Christ," he includes the whole catalog of virtues. And why does he nowhere say "my Lord so-and-so" or "my Master this person"? It is because these commendations were greater than those. For those are merely titles of rank (τιμἥς), but these are titles of virtue. And he paid them this same honor not randomly, or as if he were addressing people of lesser virtue with the same language as those of high and great character. For insofar as he is addressing them—and that too, one along with another in the same letter—he honors them all alike. But by stating the praises particular to each person, he sets before us the virtue peculiar to each. In this way he neither gives rise to envy by honoring one and dishonoring another, nor creates in them laziness and confusion by giving them all the same dignity when they did not deserve the same. See now how he again comes to the admirable women. For after saying, "Salute them which are of Aristobulus' household,"

There is no praise like this, being unblamable, and giving no handle in the things of God. For when he says, approved in Christ, he includes the whole list of virtues. And on what ground does he nowhere say my Lord such an one, my Master this? It is because these encomiums were greater than those. For those are mere titles of rank ( τιμἥς), but these are of virtue. And this same honor he paid them not at random, or as addressing several of inferior virtue with the high and great characters. For so far as he is addressing, and that too one along with another, and in the same letter, he honors them all alike. But by stating the praises particularly to each, he sets before us the virtue peculiar to each; so as neither to give birth to envy by honoring one and dishonoring another, nor to work in them listlessness and confusion, by giving them all the same dignity, though they did not deserve the same. See now how he again comes to the admirable women. For after saying, Salute them which are of Aristobulus' household,

Verse 11. Greet Herodion my kinsman; greet those who belong to the household of Narcissus.

Ver. 11. Salute Herodion my kinsman; greet them which be of the household of Narcissus;

It is likely that these people were not as distinguished as those mentioned earlier. For this reason, Paul does not even name them all individually. After giving them the praise that suited them—namely, that they were faithful (and this is the meaning of the phrase)—

Who, it is likely, were not so worthy as the afore-mentioned, on which account also he does not mention them all by name even, and after giving them the encomium which was suited to them, that of being faithful, (and this the meaning of,)

Which are in the Lord.

Which are in the Lord.

He returns again to the women and says,

He again reverts to the women, and says,

Verse 12. Greet Tryphena and Tryphosa, who work hard in the Lord.

Ver. 12. Salute Tryphena and Tryphosa, who labor in the Lord.

Regarding the earlier woman, he says she gave you her labor, but of these two he says they are still laboring. And this is no small praise, that they should be constantly at work, and not only work but labor as well. But he calls Persis beloved too, to show that she is greater than these.

And in regard to the former woman, he says that she bestowed labor upon you, but of these that they are still laboring. And this is no small encomium, that they should be in work throughout, and should not only work, but labor even. But Persis he calls beloved too, to show that she is greater than these.

For he says, "Salute my beloved Persis."

For he says, Salute my beloved Persis.

And he likewise testifies to her great labors, saying, "who labored much in the Lord."

And of her great laborings he likewise bears testimony, and says, which labored much in the Lord.

He knows exactly how to recognize each person according to their merits. By doing this, he makes these individuals more enthusiastic by not denying them any of what they are due, even commending the smallest superiority. At the same time, he makes the others more virtuous and spurs them on to the same zeal through his praises of these people.

So well does he know how to name each after his deserts, so making these more eager by not depriving them of any of their dues, but commending even the slightest preëminence, and making the others more virtuous, and inciting them to the same zeal, by his encomiums upon these.

Verse 12. Greet Rufus, chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine.

Ver. 12. Salute Rufus, chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine.

Here again the good things are without any drawback, since both the son and the mother are of such character, and the house is full of blessing, and the root agrees with the fruit. For Paul would not have simply said "his mother and mine" unless he had been testifying to the woman's great virtue.

Here again the good things are without any drawback, since the son and the mother are each of such a character, and the house is full of blessing, and the root agrees with the fruit; for he would not have simply said, his mother and mine, unless he had been bearing testimony to the woman for great virtue.

Verse 14. Greet Asyncritus, Phlegon, Hermas, Patrobas, Hermes, and the brothers who are with them.

Ver. 14. Salute Asyncritus, Phlegon, Hermas, Patrobas, Hermes, and the brethren which are with them.

Here don't focus on how he begins addressing them without any praise, but on how he did not consider them—though they appear to be far inferior to everyone else—unworthy of being addressed by him. Or rather, even this is no small praise, that he actually calls them brethren, just as he also calls those mentioned after them saints. For he says,

Here do not be looking to how he starts them without any encomium, but how he did not reckon them, though far inferior, as it seems, to all, unworthy of being addressed by him. Or rather even this is no slight praise that he even calls them brethren, as also those that are after them he calls saints. For he says,

Verse 15. Greet Philologus and Julius, Nereus and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints who are with them.

Ver. 15. Salute Philologus, and Julius, and Nereus and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints which are with them;

This was the highest honor and an indescribable height of dignity. Then, to prevent any jealousy from arising because he addressed one person in one way and another in a different way—naming some individually while mentioning others without distinction, praising some with many points and others with fewer—he once again brings them together in the equality of love and in the holy kiss, saying,

Which was the greatest dignity, and unspeakable height of honor. Then to prevent any jealousy rising from his addressing one in one way and another in another, and some by name and some with no distinction, and some with more points of praise, and some with fewer, he again mingles them in the equality of charity, and in the holy kiss, saying,

Greet one another with a holy kiss.

Ver. 16. Salute one another with an holy kiss.

To remove from them, through this greeting, all arguing that troubled them and all reasons for petty pride—so that neither the great might look down on the small, nor the small resent the greater—and so that arrogance and envy might be driven away even more, since this kiss calmed and made everyone equal. And so he not only tells them to greet one another in this way, but also sends them greetings from the Churches in the same manner. For he says, not this or that individual person greets you, but all of you together,

To cast out of them, by this salutation, all arguing that confused them, and all grounds for little pride; that neither the great might despise the little, nor the little grudge at the greater, but that haughtiness and envy might be more driven away, when this kiss soothed down and levelled every one. And therefore he not only bids them salute in this way, but sends in like manner to them the greeting from the Churches. For there salute you, he says, not this or that person individually, but all of you in common,

The churches of Christ.

The Churches of Christ.

You see that we gain no small benefits from these teachings, and what treasures we would have rushed past if we had not examined this part of the Epistle carefully, as far as we were able. So if there is anyone wise and spiritual, he will dive even deeper and find even more pearls. But since some have often asked why Paul addressed so many people in this Epistle, which he has not done in any other Epistle, we might say that it is because he had never yet seen the Romans that he does this. Yet someone may say, "Well, he had not seen the Colossians either, and yet he did not do anything like this." But these Romans were more distinguished than others, and had come there from other cities, to a safer and more royal city. Since they were living in a foreign land and needed much support for security, and some of them were his acquaintances, and some too had rendered him many important services, he rightly commends them by letter. For Paul's fame was then not small, but so great that even his sending them letters gave those who had the honor of receiving an Epistle from him much protection. For people not only respected him, but were even afraid of him. Had this not been so, he would not have said, "who has been a helper of many, and of myself also" (Romans 16:2). And again, "I could wish that I myself were accursed" (Romans 9:3). And to Philemon he wrote and said, "as Paul the aged, and a prisoner of Jesus Christ" (Philemon 9). And to the Galatians, "Behold, I Paul say to you" (Galatians 5:2). And, "You received me as Jesus Christ" (Galatians 4:14). And writing to the Corinthians he said, "Now some are puffed up, as though I would not come to you" (1 Corinthians 4:18). And again, "These things I have figuratively applied to myself and to Apollos, that you might learn in us not to think of men above what is written" (1 Corinthians 4:6). Now from all these passages it is clear that everyone had a high opinion of him. Wishing then that they should feel at ease and be honored, he addressed each of them, setting forth their praise in the best way he could. For one he calls beloved, another kinsman, another both, another fellow-prisoner, another fellow-worker, another approved, another elect. And of the women, one he addresses by her office, for he does not call her servant of the Church in an undefined way (because if this were so he would have given Tryphena and Persis this title too), but this one as having the office of deaconess, and another as helper and assistant, another as mother, another for the labors she underwent, and some he addresses by the household they belonged to, some by the name of brothers, some by the title of saints. And some he honors by the mere fact of addressing them, and some by addressing them by name, and some by calling them first-fruits, and some by their precedence in time, but more than all, Priscilla and Aquila. For even if all were believers, still all were not alike, but were different in their merits. Therefore to lead them all to greater zeal, he keeps no one's commendations concealed. For when those who labor more do not receive the greater reward also, many become more careless. On this ground even in the kingdom, the honors are not equal, nor among the disciples were all alike, but the three were preeminent above the rest. And among these three again there was a great difference. For this is a very exact method observed by God even to the last. Hence, "one star differs from another star in glory" (1 Corinthians 15:41), it says. And yet all were Apostles and all are to sit on twelve thrones, and all left their possessions, and all accompanied Him; still it was the three He took. And again, to these very three, He said it was possible that some might even be superior. "For to sit," He says, "on My right hand and on My left, is not Mine to give, except to those for whom it is prepared" (Mark 10:40). And He sets Peter before them, when He says, "Do you love Me more than these?" (John 21:15). And John too was loved even above the rest. For there shall be a strict examination of all, and if you are but a little better than your neighbor, if it is even an atom or anything ever so little, God will not overlook even this. And this even from ancient times one might see made clear. For even Lot was a righteous man, yet not so much as Abraham; and Hezekiah again, yet not so much as David; and all the prophets, yet not so much as John.

You see that they are no small gains that we earn from these addresses, and what treasures we should have passed hastily over, unless in this part of the Epistle also we had examined it with accuracy, such, I mean, as was in our power. So if there be found any man of wisdom and spiritual, he will dive even deeper, and find a greater number of pearls. But since some have often made it a question wherefore it was that in this Epistle he addressed so many, which thing he has not done in any other Epistle, we might say that it is owing to his never having seen the Romans yet, that he does this. And yet one may say, Well, he had not seen the Colossians either, and yet he did not do anything of the kind. But these were more honorable than others, and had come there from other cities, as to a safer and more royal city. Since then they were living in a foreign country, and they needed much provision for security, and some of them were of his acquaintance, but some too were there who had rendered him many important services, he with reason commends them by letters; for the glory of Paul was then not little, but so great, that even from his sending them letters, those who had the happiness to have an Epistle to them, gained much protection. For men not only reverenced him, but were even afraid of him. Had this not been so, he would not have said, who had been a succorer of many, and of myself also. Romans 16:2 And again, I could wish that myself were accursed. Romans 9:3 And to Philemon he wrote and said, as Paul the aged, and a prisoner of Jesus Christ. Philippians 9 And to the Galatians, Behold, I Paul say unto you. Galatians 5:2 And, You received me even as Jesus Christ. Galatians 4:14 And writing to the Corinthians he said, Now some are puffed up, as though I would not come unto you. 1 Corinthians 4:18 And again, These things I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos, that you might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written. 1 Corinthians 4:6 Now from all these passages it is clear that all had a great opinion of him. Wishing then that they should feel on easy terms, and be in honor, he addressed each of them, setting forth their praise to the best advantage he might. For one he calls beloved, another kinsman, another both, another fellow-prisoner, another fellow-worker, another approved, another elect. And of the women one he addresses by her title, for he does not call her servant of the Church in an undefined way (because if this were so he would have given Tryphena and Persis this name too), but this one as having the office of deaconess, and another as helper and assistant, another as mother, another from the labors she underwent, and some he addresses from the house they belonged to, some by the name of Brethren, some by the appellation of Saints. And some he honors by the mere fact of addressing them, and some by addressing them by name, and some by calling them first-fruits, and some by their precedence in time, but more than all, Priscilla and Aquila. ( τοὺς περὶ Πρ. κ. ̓Α.) For even if all were believers, still all were not alike, but were different in their merits. Wherefore to lead them all to greater emulation, he keeps no man's encomiums concealed. For when they who labor more, do not receive the greater reward also, many become more listless. On this ground even in the kingdom, the honors are not equal, nor among the disciples were all alike, but the three were preëminent above the rest. And among these three again there was a great difference. For this is a very exact method observed by God even to the last. Hence, one star differs from another star in glory, 1 Corinthians 15:41, it says. And yet all were Apostles and all are to sit on twelve thrones, and all left their goods, and all companied with Him; still it was the three He took. And again, to these very three, He said it was possible ( ἐ γχωρεῖν) that some might even be superior. For to sit, He says, on My right hand and on My left, is not mine to give, save to those for whom it is prepared. Mark 10:40 And He sets Peter before them, when He says, Lovest thou Me more than these? John 21:15 And John too was loved even above the rest. For there shall be a strict examination of all, and if you be but little better than your neighbor, if it be even an atom, or anything ever so little, God will not overlook even this. And this even from of old one might see coming out. For even Lot was a righteous man, yet not so, as was Abraham; and Hezekiah again, yet not so as was David: and all the prophets, yet not so as was John.

Given the care with which these matters are presented, where then are those who refuse to accept that there is a hell? For if all the righteous will not enjoy the same destiny, if they surpass one another even slightly (for one star, it says, differs from another star in glory), how could sinners share the same fate as the righteous? Even a human being would not create such confusion, much less God! But if you wish, I will show you that even in the case of sinners, judging from observable facts, there is this distinction and precise judgment. Consider this: Adam sinned and Eve sinned, and both transgressed, yet they were not equally guilty. Therefore neither were they equally punished. The difference was so great that Paul said, "Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived fell into transgression." Yet the deception was one and the same. Still, God's thorough examination revealed a difference so great that Paul made this statement. Again, Cain was punished, but Lamech, who committed murder after him, did not suffer nearly so severe a punishment. Yet both acts were murder, and Lamech's was worse because even the example before him had not made him better. But since Lamech did not kill his brother after receiving a warning, did not need an accuser, and did not shrink from answering when God questioned him, but even without any accuser pleaded against himself and condemned himself more severely, he obtained pardon. But Cain, having done the opposite, was punished. See with what precision God examines the facts. For this reason He punished those in the flood one way and those in Sodom another, and the Israelites again—both those in Babylon and those in Antiochus' time—in different ways, thus showing that He keeps a strict account of our actions. Some were slaves for seventy years and others for four hundred, but others ate their children and underwent countless other more grievous calamities, and even in this way were not freed, neither they nor those who were burned alive in Sodom. For it shall be more tolerable, He says, for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah than for that city. For if He has no care for us, either when we sin or when we do right, perhaps there would be some reason in saying that there is no punishment. But since He is so extremely concerned about our not sinning and uses so many means to keep us on the right path, it is very clear that He punishes the wicked and also crowns those who do right. But let me ask you to consider the inconsistency of most people. For they complain against God because in His great patience He overlooks so many who are impious, impure, or violent, without punishing them now. Again, if He threatens to punish them in the next world, they are fierce and insistent in their accusations. Yet if this is troubling to them, they ought to accept and admire the former. But what folly! What an unreasonable and senseless attitude! What a sin-loving soul that longs after vice! For it is from this that all these opinions originate. And so if those who say these things would resolve to pursue virtue, they will immediately find themselves satisfied concerning hell also and will not doubt. And where, it is asked, and in what place is this hell? For some storytellers say that it is in the valley of Jehoshaphat, thus taking what was said about a certain past war and applying it to hell. But Scripture does not say this. But in what place, I ask, will it be? Somewhere, I think at least, entirely outside the bounds of this world. For just as prisons and mines are at a great distance from royal residences, so hell will be somewhere outside this world. Let us not seek to know where it is, but how we may escape it. Nor should we disbelieve in things to come simply because God does not punish everyone here. For He is merciful and patient—that is why He threatens and does not immediately cast us into it. For I desire not, He says, the death of a sinner. But if there is no death of a sinner, the words are meaningless. And I know indeed that there is nothing less pleasant to you than these words. But to me nothing is more pleasant. And I wish it were possible at our dinner, our supper, our baths, and everywhere to be talking about hell. For we would not then feel the pain of the evils in this world, nor the pleasure of its good things. For what would you tell me is an evil? Poverty? Disease? Captivity? Physical disability? Why, all these things are trivial compared to the punishment there, even if you speak of those who are tormented with hunger all their lives, or those who are disabled from their earliest days and beg—even this is luxury compared to those other evils. Let us then continually occupy ourselves with talking about these things. For to remember hell prevents our falling into hell. Do you not hear Saint Paul saying, "Who shall suffer everlasting punishment from the face of the Lord"? Do you not hear what Nero's character was, whom Paul even calls the Mystery of Antichrist? For "the mystery of iniquity," he says, "already works." What then? Is Nero to suffer nothing? Is Antichrist to suffer nothing? Or the Devil nothing? Then he will always be Antichrist, and so will the Devil. For they will not cease from evil unless they are punished. Yes, you say, but that there is a hell everyone sees. But only the unbelievers will fall into it. What is the reason, I ask? It is because the believers acknowledge their Master. And what does this matter? When their life is impure, they will on this ground be punished more severely than the unbelievers. For "as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law, but as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law." And "The servant who knew his master's will and did it not shall be beaten with many stripes." But if there is no such thing as giving an account of one's life, and all this is said carelessly, then neither will the Devil have vengeance taken upon him. For he too knows God, and far more than men do, and all the demons know Him and tremble and acknowledge that He is their Judge. If then there is no giving an account of our life, nor of evil deeds, then they too will completely escape. These things are not so, surely they are not! Do not deceive yourselves, beloved. For if there is no hell, how will the Apostles judge the twelve tribes of Israel? How does Paul say, "Do you not know that we shall judge angels? How much more things of this life"? How did Christ say, "The men of Nineveh shall arise and condemn this generation," and "It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment"? Why then make light of things that are no laughing matter? Why deceive yourself and cheat your reason? Why fight against God's love for humanity? For it was through this that He prepared it and threatened, that we might not be cast into it, having become better through this fear. And thus whoever does away with speaking on these subjects does nothing else than thrust us into it and drive us there by this deception. Do not weaken the hands of those who labor for virtue, nor increase the laziness of those who sleep. For if the many are persuaded that there is no hell, when will they leave off vice? Or when will justice be seen? I do not speak of the distinction between sinners and righteous people, but between sinners and sinners. For why is it that one is punished here and another is not punished, though he commits the same sins or even far worse? For if there is no hell, you will have nothing to say in defense of this to those who raise it as an objection. Therefore my advice is that we abandon this foolishness and silence those who argue against these matters. For there will be an exact examination of the smallest things, both in the way of sins and in the way of good deeds, and we shall be punished for lustful looks, for idle words, for mere insulting words, for drunkenness we shall give an account, just as even for a cup of cold water we shall receive a reward, and for a sigh only. For it says, "Set a mark upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and cry." How then do you dare to say that He who will examine our actions with such great precision threatened hell with empty words and lightly? Do not, I beg you, do not with these false hopes destroy yourself and those who believe you! For if you disbelieve our words, inquire of Jews and Gentiles and all heretics. And all of them as with one voice will answer that there shall be a judgment and a retribution. And are human beings not enough? Ask the devils themselves, and you will hear them cry, "Why have you come here to torment us before the time?" And putting all this together, persuade your soul not to be careless, lest by experience you come to know there is a hell, but from this you may be sobered and so be able to escape those tortures and attain to the good

Where then are they who with all this great exactness in view, yet will not allow that there is a hell? For if all the righteous are not to enjoy the same lot, if they exceed others even a little ( for one star, it says, differs from another star in glory,) 1 Corinthians 15:41, how are sinners to be in the same lot with the righteous? Such a confusion as this even man would not make, much less God! But if you will, I will show you that even in the case of sinners, arguing from existing facts, there is this distinction, and exact just judgment. Now consider; Adam sinned, and Eve sinned, and both transgressed, yet they were not equally sinful. And therefore neither were they equally punished. For the difference was so great that Paul said, Adam was not deceived but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. And yet the deceit was one. But still God's searching examination pointed out a difference so great, as that Paul should make this assertion. Again, Cain was punished, but Lamech, who committed a murder after him, did not suffer near so great a punishment. And yet this was a murder, and that was a murder, and that so much the worse, because even by the example he had not become the better. But since the one neither killed his brother after exhortation, nor needed an accuser, nor shrunk from answering when God questioned him, but even without any accuser both pleaded again himself, and condemned himself more severely, he obtained pardon. But the other as having done the opposite was punished. See with what exactness God sifts the facts. For this reason He punished those in the flood in one way, and those in Sodom in another; and the Israelites again, both those in Babylon, and those in Antiochus' time, in different ways: so showing that He keeps a strict account of our doings. And these were slaves for seventy years, and those for four hundred, but others again ate their children, and underwent countless other more grievous calamities, and even in this way were not freed, either they or those that were burnt alive in Sodom. For it shall be more tolerable, He says, for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha, than for that city. Matthew 10:15 For if He has no care for us, either when we sin or when we do aright, perhaps there will be some reason in saying that there is no punishment. But since He is so exceedingly urgent about our not sinning, and adopts so many means to keep us in the right, it is very plain that He punishes the wicked, and also crowns those that do right. But let me beg you to consider the unfairness of the generality. For they find fault with God because He so often long-suffering, overlooks so many that are impious, impure, or violent, without now suffering punishment. Again, if He threaten to punish them in the other world, they are vehement and pressing in their accusations. And yet if this be painful, they ought to accept and admire the other. But alas the folly! The unreasonable and asinine spirit! Alas the sin-loving soul, that gazes after vice! For it is from this that all these opinions have their birth. And so if they who utter these things should be minded to lay hold upon virtue, they will presently find themselves satisfied concerning hell also, and will not doubt. And where (it is said) and in what place is this hell? For some fablers say that it is in the valley of Josaphat, thus drawing that which was said about a certain by-gone war, to apply to hell. But the Scripture does not say this. But in what place, pray, will it be? Somewhere as I think at least quite out of the pale of this world. For as the prisons and mines are at a great distance from royal residences, so will hell be somewhere out of this world. Seek we not then to know where it is, but how we may escape it. Neither yet because God does not punish all here, therefore disbelieve things to come. For merciful and long-suffering He is: that is why he threatens, and does not cast us into it immediately. For I desire not, He says, the death of a sinner. Ezekiel 18:32 But if there is no death of a sinner, the words are but idle. And I know indeed that there is nothing less pleasant to you than these words. But to me nothing is pleasanter. And would it were possible at our dinner, and our supper, and our baths, and everywhere, to be discoursing about hell. For we should not then feel the pain at the evils in this world, nor the pleasure of its good things. For what would you tell me was an evil? poverty? Disease? captivity? Maiming of the body? Why all these things are sport compared to the punishment there, even should you speak of those who are tormented with famine all their life long; or those who are maimed from their earliest days, and beg, even this is luxury compared to those other evils. Let us then continually employ ourselves with talking about these things. For to remember hell prevents our falling into hell. Do you not hear St. Paul saying, Who shall suffer everlasting punishment from the face of the Lord? 2 Thessalonians 1:9 Do you not hear what Nero's character was, whom Paul even calls the Mystery of Antichrist? For the mystery of iniquity, he says, already works. 2 Thessalonians 2:7 What then? Is Nero to suffer nothing? Is Antichrist to suffer nothing? Or the Devil nothing? Then he will always be Antichrist, and so the Devil. For from mischief they will not leave off, unless they be punished. Yea, you say, but that there is a hell everybody sees. But the unbelievers only are to fall into it. What is the reason, pray? It is because the believers acknowledge their Master. And what is this to the purpose? When their life is impure, they will on this ground be punished more severely than the unbelievers. For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: but as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law. Romans 2:12 And, The servant that knew his master's will, and did it not, shall be beaten with many stripes. Luke 12:47 But if there is no such thing as giving an account of one's life, and all this is said in a loose way then neither will the Devil have vengeance taken upon him. For he too knows God, and far more than men too, and all the demons know Him, and tremble, and own He is their Judge. If then there is no giving an account of our life, nor of evil deeds, then will they also clean escape. These things are not so, surely they are not! Deceive not yourselves, beloved. For if there is no hell, how are the Apostles to judge the twelve tribes of Israel? How comes Paul to say, Do you not know that we shall judge Angels? How much more things of this life? 1 Corinthians 6:3 How came Christ to say, The men of Nineveh shall arise and condemn this generation Matthew 12:41; and, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment? Matthew 11:24 Why then make merry with things that are no subjects for merriment? Why deceive yourself and put cheats upon your reason ( παραλογίζῃ, om. τὴν ψυχήνσου)? Why fight with the love of God toward man? For it was through this that He prepared it, and threatened, that we might not be cast into it, as having by this fear become better. And thus he that does away with speaking on these subjects does nothing else than thrust us into it, and drive us there by this deceit. Slacken not the hands of them then that labor for virtue, nor make the listlessness of them that sleep greater. For if the many be persuaded that there is no hell, when will they leave off vice? Or when will right be seen? I do not say between sinners and righteous men, but between sinners and sinners? For why is it that one is punished here, and another not punished, though he does the same sins, or even far worse? For if there be no hell, you will having nothing to say in defense of this to those who make it an objection. Wherefore my advice is, that we leave off this trifling, and stop the mouths of those that are gainsayers upon these subjects. For there will be an exact searching into the smallest things, both in the way of sins and in the way of good deeds, and we shall be punished for unchaste looks, and for idle words, and for mere reproachful words, and for drunkenness we shall render an account, as even for a cup of cold water we shall receive a reward, and a sigh only. Ecclesiastes 12:14 For it says, Set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry. Ezekiel 9:4 How then do you dare to say that He, who with so great exactness will search into our doings, threatened hell in bare words, and lightly? Do not, I beseech you, do not with these vain hopes destroy yourself and those that are persuaded by you! For if you disbelieve our words, make enquiry of Jews and Gentiles, and all heretics. And all of them as with one mouth will answer that a judgment there shall be, and a retribution. And are men not enough? Ask the devils themselves, and you will hear them cry, Why have you come there to torment us before the time. Matthew 8:29 And putting all this together persuade your soul not to trifle idly, lest by experience thou come to know there is a hell, but from this you may be sobered, and so able to escape those tortures, and attain to the good things to come; whereof may we all partake by the grace and love towards man, etc.