On the Holy Spirit — Book I

Ambrose on the full divinity of the Holy Spirit, one in power and glory with the Father and the Son.

Source: Translated by H. de Romestin, E. de Romestin and H.T.F. Duckworth. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 10. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1896. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/34021.htm>.

Contents · 18 chapters
  1. Introduction
  2. The book
  3. Chapter 1.
  4. Chapter 2.
  5. Chapter 3.
  6. Chapter 4.
  7. Chapter 5.
  8. Chapter 6.
  9. Chapter 7.
  10. Chapter 8.
  11. Chapter 9.
  12. Chapter 10.
  13. Chapter 11.
  14. Chapter 12.
  15. Chapter 13.
  16. Chapter 14.
  17. Chapter 15.
  18. Chapter 16.

Introduction

The three books on the Holy Spirit are, as St. Ambrose himself says, a follow-up to those on the Faith, and the two works together have sometimes been cited as if they were one, under the title De Trinitate. But we can see from Gratian's letter to St. Ambrose and from his reply that each work is separate, and the De Spiritu Sancto was written several years later, in A.D. 381.

The three books on the Holy Spirit are, as St. Ambrose says himself, a sequel to those on the Faith, and the two treatises together have been sometimes quoted as if one, with the title, De Trinitate. But we see from Gratian's letter to St. Ambrose, and from the reply, that each treatise is separate, and the De Spiritu Sancto was written some years later, a.d. 381.

In the first book, St. Ambrose begins by interpreting the story of Gideon and the fleece allegorically, seeing in the drying of the fleece and the moistening of the threshing floor a symbol of the Holy Spirit leaving the Jews and being poured out on the Gentiles. Moving to his main topic, he proves that the Holy Spirit is above all creation and is truly God, using as a particular argument the fact that the sin against the Holy Spirit can never be forgiven, either in this world or in the world to come. He demonstrates how Scripture calls the Holy Spirit the Spirit of God, that He spoke through the prophets and apostles, that He sanctifies people, and is prefigured by the mystical ointment mentioned in Scripture. Next, St. Ambrose addresses His unity with the other two Persons of the Holy Trinity, and shows that His mission does not diminish this unity, but that in all the Divine Persons there is a perfect unity of peace, love, and other virtues.

In the first book St. Ambrose commences by allegorizing the history of Gideon and the fleece, seeing in the drying of the fleece and the moistening of the threshing-floor a type of the Holy Spirit leaving the Jews and being poured out on the Gentiles. Passing to his more immediate subject, he proves that the Holy Spirit is above the whole Creation and is truly God, alleging as a special argument that the sin against the Holy Spirit can never be forgiven, here or hereafter. He shows how the Holy Spirit is in Scripture called the Spirit of God; that He spoke by the prophets and apostles; that He sanctifies men, and is typified by the mystical ointment spoken of in Scripture. Next, St. Ambrose treats of His oneness with the other two Persons of the Holy Trinity, and shows that His mission in no way detracts from this oneness, but that there is in all the Divine Persons a perfect unity of peace, love, and other virtues.

The second book begins by treating the history of Samson in the same way as that of Gideon in Book I. Samson always succeeded as long as the Holy Spirit was with him, but fell into misfortune as soon as he was forsaken. It is shown that the power of the Holy Spirit is the same as that of the Father and the Son, and that there is an agreement in design and working, and in giving life to man. He is Creator and therefore to be worshipped, and He worked with the Father and the Son in founding the Church, and in conclusion the unity of operation in the Three Persons is proved.

The second book commences with a treatment of the history of Samson in the same way as that of Gideon in Book I. Samson always succeeded so long as the Holy Spirit was with him, but fell into misfortune so soon as he was forsaken. It is shown that the power of the Holy Spirit is the same as that of the Father and the Son, and that there is an agreement in design and working, and in vivifying man. He is Creator and therefore to be worshipped, and He worked with the Father and the Son in founding the Church, and in conclusion is proved the unity of operation in the Three Persons.

The third book continues the same argument, showing that the mission of prophets and apostles, and even of the Son Himself, is to be referred to the Spirit, yet without any subjection on the part of the Son, since the Spirit also receives His mission from the Father and the Son. The Godhead of the Holy Spirit is next taken up and proved, when the opportunity is also taken to show that there are not three Gods or three Lords, for the Three Divine Persons are one in holiness and nature. The work is concluded with a summary of some of the principal arguments.

The third book continues the same argument, showing that the mission of prophets and apostles, and even of the Son Himself, is to be referred to the Spirit, yet without any subjection on the part of the Son, seeing that the Spirit also receives His mission from the Father and the Son. The Godhead of the Holy Spirit is next taken up and proved, when occasion is taken also to show that there are not three Gods or three Lords, for the Three Divine Persons are one in holiness and nature; and the work is concluded with a summary of some of the principal arguments.

There can be little doubt that this is the work, and St. Ambrose the author, that St. Jerome bitterly attacked. The whole passage can be read in the Apology of Rufinus, page 470, in volume three of this series. St. Ambrose is compared to a jackdaw dressed in another bird's feathers and accused of writing bad things in Latin taken from good things in Greek. St. Jerome even went to the trouble of translating a work by St. Didymus on the Holy Spirit (from whose preface the above extracts are taken) so that those who did not know Greek might, St. Jerome hoped, recognize the plagiarisms.

There can be but little doubt that this is the work, and St. Ambrose the author, bitterly attacked by St. Jerome; the whole passage may be read in the Apology of Rufinus, p. 470, in vol. iii. of this series. St. Ambrose is compared to a daw decked in another bird's plumage, and charged with writing bad things in Latin taken from good things in Greek, and St. Jerome even took the trouble to translate a work of St. Didymus on the Holy Spirit (from the preface to which the above extracts are taken), in order that those who did not know Greek might, St. Jerome hoped, recognize the plagiarisms.

Rufinus vigorously defends St. Ambrose and points out many inconsistencies in his opponent's argument. He says: The holy Ambrose wrote his book on the Holy Spirit not merely with words but with his own blood, for he offered his life to his persecutors and shed his blood inwardly, though God preserved his life for future work.

Rufinus vigorously defends St. Ambrose, and, pointing out many inconsistencies in his opponent, says: The saintly Ambrose wrote his book on the Holy Spirit not in words only but with his own blood, for he offered his life-blood to his persecutors, and shed it within himself, though God preserved his life for future labours.

The truth is that St. Ambrose, being a good Greek scholar and having undertaken to write on the Holy Spirit, studied what others had written before him and made use of what had been argued by SS. Basil, Didymus, and others. The opinion of the great St. Augustine concerning this treatise may be set against that of St. Jerome. St. Ambrose, when treating the deep subject of the Holy Spirit and showing that He is equal with the Father and the Son, nevertheless uses a simple style of discourse, since his subject required not the embellishments of language but proofs to move the minds of his readers.

The truth is that St. Ambrose being a good Greek scholar, and having undertaken to write on the Holy Spirit, studied what others had written before him, and made use of what had been urged by SS. Basil, Didymus, and others. The opinion of the great St. Augustine concerning this treatise may be set against that of St. Jerome. St. Ambrose when treating of the deep subject of the Holy Spirit, and showing that He is equal with the Father and the Son, yet makes use of a simple style of discourse; inasmuch as his subject required no the embellishments of language, but proofs to move the minds of his readers.

The book

To the Emperor Gratian.

To the Emperor Gratian.

The choice of Gideon was a figure of our Lord's Incarnation, the sacrifice of a kid represented the satisfaction for sins in the body of Christ, and the sacrifice of the bullock represented the abolition of profane rites. In the three hundred soldiers there was a type of the future redemption through the cross. Gideon's seeking of various signs was also a mystery, for the dryness and moistening of the fleece signified the falling away of the Jews and the calling of the Gentiles, while the water received in a basin signified the washing of the apostles' feet. St. Ambrose prays that his own pollution may be washed away and praises the loving-kindness of Christ. The same water sent forth by the Son of God produces marvelous conversions. However, it cannot be sent by any other, since it is the pouring forth of the Holy Spirit, who is subject to no external power.

The choice of Gideon was a figure of our Lord's Incarnation, the sacrifice of a kid, of the satisfaction for sins in the body of Christ; that of the bullock, of the abolition of profane rites; and in the three hundred soldiers was a type of the future redemption through the cross. The seeking of various signs by Gideon was also a mystery, for by the dryness and moistening of the fleece was signified the falling away of the Jews and the calling of the Gentiles, by the water received in a basin the washing of the apostles' feet. St. Ambrose prays that his own pollution may be washed away, and praises the loving-kindness of Christ. The same water sent forth by the Son of God effects marvellous conversions; it cannot, however, be sent by any other, since it is the pouring forth of the Holy Spirit, Who is subject to no external power.

When Jerubbaal, as we read, was beating out wheat under an oak, he received a message from God so that he might bring the people of God from the power of foreigners into freedom. It is no wonder that he was chosen for grace, since even then, being appointed under the shadow of the holy cross and of the adorable Wisdom in the predestined mystery of the future Incarnation, he was bringing forth the visible grains of the fruitful grain from their hiding places, and was mystically separating the elect of the saints from the worthless chaff. For these elect, as though trained with the rod of truth, laying aside the superfluities of the old man together with his deeds, are gathered in the Church as in a winepress. For the Church is the winepress of the eternal fountain, since from her flows forth the juice of the heavenly Vine.

1. When Jerubbaal, as we read, was beating out wheat Judges 6:11 under an oak, he received a message from God in order that he might bring the people of God from the power of strangers into liberty. Nor is it a matter of wonder if he was chosen for grace, seeing that even then, being appointed under the shadow of the holy cross and of the adorable Wisdom in the predestined mystery of the future Incarnation, he was bringing forth the visible grains of the fruitful grain from their hiding places, and was [ mystically] separating the elect of the saints from the refuse of the empty chaff. For these elect, as though trained with the rod of truth, laying aside the superfluities of the old man together with his deeds, are gathered in the Church as in a winepress. For the Church is the winepress of the eternal fountain, since from her wells forth the juice of the heavenly Vine.

Gideon was moved by that message. When he heard that God would deliver His people from their enemies through one man, even though thousands of the people had failed, he offered a young goat. Following the Angel's instructions, he laid its meat and unleavened bread upon a rock and poured the broth over them. When the Angel touched them with the tip of his staff, fire burst out of the rock and consumed the sacrifice he was offering. This makes it clear that the rock represented the Body of Christ, for it is written: "They drank of that rock that followed them, and that rock was Christ." This certainly refers not to His Godhead, but to His Flesh, which watered the hearts of the thirsty people with the continual stream of His Blood.

2. And Gideon, moved by that message, when he heard that, though thousands of the people failed, God would deliver His own from their enemies by means of one man, Judges 6:14 offered a kid, and according to the word of the Angel, laid its flesh and the unleavened cakes upon the rock, and poured the broth upon them. And as soon as the Angel touched them with the end of the staff which he bore, fire burst forth out of the rock, and so the sacrifice which he was offering was consumed. Judges 6:19-21 By which it seems clear that that rock was a figure of the Body of Christ, for it is written: They drank of that rock that followed them, and that rock was Christ. 1 Corinthians 10:4 Which certainly refers not to His Godhead, but to His Flesh, which watered the hearts of the thirsting people with the perpetual stream of His Blood.

Even at that time it was revealed in mystery that the Lord Jesus in His Flesh would, when crucified, remove the sins of the whole world—not only the actions of the body, but also the desires of the soul. For the flesh of the kid represents sins of action, while the broth represents the temptations of desire, as it is written: "For the people lusted an evil lust, and said, Who shall give us flesh to eat?" The fact that the Angel then stretched out his staff and touched the rock, from which fire came out, shows that the Flesh of the Lord, being filled with the Divine Spirit, would burn away all the sins of human weakness. This is why the Lord also says: "I have come to send fire upon the earth."

3. Even at that time was it declared in a mystery that the Lord Jesus in His Flesh would, when crucified, do away the sins of the whole world, and not only the deeds of the body, but the desires of the soul. For the flesh of the kid refers to sins of deed, the broth to the enticements of desire as it is written: For the people lusted an evil lust, and said, Who shall give us flesh to eat? Numbers 11:4 That the Angel then stretched forth his staff, and touched the rock, from which fire went out, Judges 6:21 shows that the Flesh of the Lord, being filled with the Divine Spirit, would burn away all the sins of human frailty. Wherefore, also, the Lord says: I have come to send fire upon the earth. Luke 12:49

Then Gideon, having been instructed and knowing beforehand what was to come, observed the heavenly mysteries. Therefore, according to the warning he received, he slew the bullock his father had set aside for idols, and himself offered to God another bullock seven years old. By doing this, he clearly showed that after the Lord's coming, all Gentile sacrifices would be abolished, and only the sacrifice of the Lord's passion would be offered for the redemption of the people. For that bullock was, in a type, Christ, in whom, as Isaiah said, dwelt the fullness of the seven gifts of the Spirit. This bullock Abraham also offered when he saw the day of the Lord and was glad. He is the one who was offered at one time in the type of a kid, at another in that of a sheep, at another in that of a bullock: as a kid, because He is a sacrifice for sin; as a sheep, because He is an unresisting victim; as a bullock, because He is a victim without blemish.

4. Then the man, instructed and foreknowing what was to be, observes the heavenly mysteries, and therefore, according to the warning, slew the bullock destined by his father to idols, and himself offered to God another bullock seven years old. Judges 6:26 By doing which he most plainly showed that after the coming of the Lord all Gentile sacrifices should be done away, and that only the sacrifice of the Lord's passion should be offered for the redemption of the people. For that bullock was, in a type, Christ, in Whom, as Esaias said, dwelt the fullness of the seven gifts of the Spirit. Isaiah 11:2 This bullock Abraham also offered when he saw the day of the Lord and was glad. John 8:56 He it is Who was offered at one time in the type of a kid, at another in that of a sheep, at another in that of a bullock. Of a kid, because He is a sacrifice for sin; of a sheep, because He is an unresisting victim; of a bullock, because He is a victim without blemish.

Holy Gideon then saw the mystery beforehand. Next he chose three hundred men for the battle, in order to show that the world would be freed from the invasion of worse enemies not by the multitude of their number, but by the mystery of the cross. And yet, though he was brave and faithful, he asked the Lord for even fuller proofs of future victory, saying: If You will save Israel by my hand, O Lord, as You have said, behold I will put a fleece of wool on the threshing floor, and if there shall be dew on the fleece and dryness on all the ground, I shall know that You will deliver the people by my hand according to Your promise. And it happened so. Afterward he asked in addition that dew should descend on all the earth and dryness be on the fleece.

5. Holy Gideon then saw the mystery beforehand. Next he chose out three hundred for the battle, so as to show that the world should be freed from the incursion of worse enemies, not by the multitude of their number, but by the mystery of the cross. And yet, though he was brave and faithful, he asked of the Lord yet fuller proofs of future victory, saying: If You will save Israel by mine hand, O Lord, as You have said, behold I will put a fleece of wool on the threshing-floor, and if there shall be dew on the fleece and dryness on all the ground, I shall know that You will deliver the people by my hand according to Your promise. And it was so. Judges 6:36 Afterwards he asked in addition that dew should descend on all the earth and dryness be on the fleece.

Someone may perhaps ask whether Gideon seems to have lacked faith, since after being instructed by many signs he asked for still more. But how can he seem to have asked as if doubting or lacking in faith, when he was speaking in mysteries? He was not doubtful, but rather careful that we should not doubt. For how could he be doubtful when his prayer was effective? And how could he have begun the battle without fear, unless he had understood the message of God? For the dew on the fleece signified the faith among the Jews, because the words of God come down like the dew.

6. Some one perhaps will enquire whether he does not seem to have been wanting in faith, seeing that after being instructed by many signs he asked still more. But how can he seem to have asked as if doubting or wanting in faith, who was speaking in mysteries? He was not then doubtful, but careful that we should not doubt. For how could he be doubtful whose prayer was effectual? And how could he have begun the battle without fear, unless he had understood the message of God? For the dew on the fleece signified the faith among the Jews, because the words of God come down like the dew.

When the whole world was dried up by the drought of pagan superstition, the dew of heavenly grace fell upon the fleece. But after the lost sheep of the house of Israel (whom I believe the image of the Jewish fleece represented), after those sheep had rejected the fountain of living water, the dew of life-giving faith dried up among the Jews, and that divine Fountain redirected its flow to the hearts of the Gentiles. As a result, the entire world is now moistened with the dew of faith, but the Jews have lost their prophets and counselors.

7. So when the whole world was parched with the drought of Gentile superstition, then came that dew of the heavenly visits on the fleece. But after that the lost sheep of the house of Israel Matthew 15:24 (whom I think that the figure of the Jewish fleece shadowed forth), after that those sheep, I say, Jeremiah 2:13 had refused the fountain of living water, the dew of moistening faith dried up in the breasts of the Jews, and that divine Fountain turned away its course to the hearts of the Gentiles. Whence it has come to pass that now the whole world is moistened with the dew of faith, but the Jews have lost their prophets and counsellors.

It is not surprising that those deprived by the Lord of the fertilizing shower of prophecy should suffer the drought of unbelief, as He says: I will command My clouds that they rain not upon that vineyard. For there is a health-giving shower of saving grace, as David also said: He came down like rain upon a fleece, and like drops that drop upon the earth. The divine Scriptures promised us this rain upon the whole earth, to water the world with the dew of the Divine Spirit at the coming of the Savior. The Lord, then, has now come, and the rain has come. The Lord has come bringing the heavenly drops with Him, and so now we who were thirsty before drink and take in that Divine Spirit with an interior draft.

8. Nor is it strange that they should suffer the drought of unbelief, whom the Lord deprived of the fertilising of the shower of prophecy, saying: I will command My clouds that they rain not upon that vineyard. Isaiah 5:6 For there is a health-giving shower of salutary grace, as David also said: He came down like rain upon a fleece, and like drops that drop upon the earth. The divine Scriptures promised us this rain upon the whole earth, to water the world with the dew of the Divine Spirit at the coming of the Saviour. The Lord, then, has now come, and the rain has come; the Lord has come bringing the heavenly drops with Him, and so now we drink, who before were thirsty, and with an interior draught drink in that Divine Spirit.

Holy Gideon, then, foresaw that the Gentile nations would also drink through receiving faith, and therefore he inquired more carefully, since the caution of the saints is necessary. So much so that even Joshua the son of Nun, when he saw the captain of the heavenly army, asked: Are you for us, or for our enemies? This was to prevent him from possibly being deceived by some trick of the adversary.

9. Holy Gideon, then, foresaw this, that the nations of the Gentiles also would drink by the reception of faith, and therefore he enquired more diligently, for the caution of the saints is necessary. Insomuch that also Joshua the Son of Nun, when he saw the captain of the heavenly host, enquired: Are you for us, or for our adversaries? Joshua 5:13 lest, perchance, he might be deceived by some stratagem of the adversary.

It was not without reason that Gideon placed the fleece neither in a field nor in a meadow, but on a threshing floor, where the wheat harvest is gathered. For the harvest is plenteous, but the laborers are few, because through faith in the Lord there was going to be a harvest rich in virtues.

10. Nor was it without a reason that he put the fleece neither in a field nor in a meadow, but in a threshing-floor, where is the harvest of the wheat: For the harvest is plenteous, but the labourers are few; Luke 10:2 because that, through faith in the Lord, there was about to be a harvest fruitful in virtues.

Nor, again, was it without a reason that he dried the fleece of the Jews and put the dew from it into a basin so that it was filled with water, yet he did not himself wash his feet in that dew. The privilege of so great a mystery was to be given to another. He was being waited for who alone could wash away the filth of all. Gideon was not great enough to claim this mystery for himself, but the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve. Let us, then, recognize in whom these mysteries are seen to be accomplished. Not in holy Gideon, for they were still at their beginning. Therefore the Gentiles were surpassed, for dryness was still upon the Gentiles, and therefore Israel surpassed them, for then the dew remained on the fleece.

11. Nor, again, was it without a reason that he dried the fleece of the Jews, and put the dew from it into a basin, so that it was filled with water, yet he did not himself wash his feet in that dew. The prerogative of so great a mystery was to be given to another. He was being waited for Who alone could wash away the filth of all. Gideon was not great enough to claim this mystery for himself, but the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister. Matthew 20:28 Let us, then, recognize in Whom these mysteries are seen to be accomplished. Not in holy Gideon, for they were still at their commencement. Therefore the Gentiles were surpassed, for dryness was still upon the Gentiles, and therefore did Israel surpass them, for then did the dew remain on the fleece.

Let us come now to the Gospel of God. I find the Lord stripping Himself of His garments, girding Himself with a towel, pouring water into a basin, and washing the disciples' feet. That heavenly dew was this water, this was foretold, namely, that the Lord Jesus Christ would wash the feet of His disciples in that heavenly dew. And now let the feet of our minds be stretched out. The Lord Jesus wants also to wash our feet, for He says, not to Peter alone, but to each of the faithful: If I do not wash your feet you will have no part with Me.

12. Let us come now to the Gospel of God. I find the Lord stripping Himself of His garments, and girding Himself with a towel, pouring water into a basin, and washing the disciples' feet. John 13:4 That heavenly dew was this water, this was foretold, namely, that the Lord Jesus Christ would wash the feet of His disciples in that heavenly dew. And now let the feet of our minds be stretched out. The Lord Jesus wills also to wash our feet, for He says, not to Peter alone, but to each of the faithful: If I wash not your feet you will have no part with Me. John 13:8

Come, then, Lord Jesus, take off Your garments, which You put on for my sake. Be stripped so that You may clothe us with Your mercy. Gird Yourself for our sakes with a towel, so that You may gird us with Your gift of immortality. Pour water into the basin. Wash not only our feet but also the head, and not only of the body, but also the footsteps of the soul. I wish to put off all the filth of our frailty, so that I also may say: By night I have put off my coat, how shall I put it on? I have washed my feet, how shall I defile them?

13. Come, then, Lord Jesus, put off Your garments, which You put on for my sake; be stripped that You may clothe us with Your mercy. Gird Yourself for our sakes with a towel, that You may gird us with Your gift of immortality. Pour water into the basin, wash not only our feet but also the head, and not only of the body, but also the footsteps of the soul. I wish to put off all the filth of our frailty, so that I also may say: By night I have put off my coat, how shall I put it on? I have washed my feet, how shall I defile them? Song of Songs 5:3

14. How great is that excellence! As a servant, You wash the feet of Your disciples; as God, You send dew from heaven. Nor do You wash the feet only, but also invite us to sit down with You, and by the example of Your dignity urge us, saying: You call Me Master and Lord, and you are right to do so, for that is what I am. If, then, I the Lord and Master have washed your feet, you ought also to wash one another's feet.

14. How great is that excellence! As a servant, You wash the feet of Your disciples; as God, You send dew from heaven. Nor do You wash the feet only, but also invite us to sit down with You, and by the example of Your dignity exhort us, saying: You call Me Master and Lord, and you do well, for so I am. If, then, I the Lord and Master have washed your feet, you ought also to wash one another's feet. John 13:13-14

15. So I too want to wash the feet of my brothers and sisters. I want to fulfill the commandment of my Lord. I will not be ashamed of myself, nor will I disdain what He Himself did first. The mystery of humility is good, because while I wash away the pollution of others, I wash away my own. But not everyone was able to fully understand this mystery. Abraham was willing to wash feet, but out of a sense of hospitality. Gideon was also willing to wash the feet of the Angel of the Lord who appeared to him, but his willingness was limited to one person; he was willing as someone doing a service, not as someone conferring fellowship. This is a great mystery that no one understood. Finally, the Lord said to Peter: What I do you do not know now, but you will know later. This, I say, is a divine mystery that even those who wash will inquire into. It is not, then, the simple water of the heavenly mystery by which we become worthy of having a part with Christ.

15. I, then, wish also myself to wash the feet of my brethren, I wish to fulfil the commandment of my Lord, I will not be ashamed in myself, nor disdain what He Himself did first. Good is the mystery of humility, because while washing the pollutions of others I wash away my own. But all were not able to exhaust this mystery. Abraham was, indeed, willing to wash feet, Genesis 18:4 but because of a feeling of hospitality. Gideon, too, was willing to wash the feet of the Angel of the Lord who appeared to him, but his willingness was confined to one; he was willing as one who would do a service, not as one who would confer fellowship with himself. This is a great mystery which no one knew. Lastly, the Lord said to Peter: What I do you know not now, but shall know hereafter. John 13:7 This, I say, is a divine mystery which even they who wash will enquire into. It is not, then, the simple water of the heavenly mystery whereby we attain to be found worthy of having part with Christ.

There is also a certain water that we pour into the basin of our soul—water from the fleece and from the Book of Judges, and water from the Book of Psalms as well. It is the water of the message from heaven. Let this water, O Lord Jesus, come into my soul and into my flesh, so that through the moisture of this rain the valleys of our minds and the fields of our hearts may become green. May the drops from You fall upon me, pouring out grace and immortality. Wash the steps of my mind so that I may not sin again. Wash the heel of my soul, so that I may be able to erase the curse and not feel the serpent's bite on the foot of my soul, but instead, as You Yourself have commanded those who follow You, may tread on serpents and scorpions with an unharmed foot. You have redeemed the world—redeem the soul of a single sinner.

16. There is also a certain water which we put into the basin of our soul, water from the fleece and from the Book of Judges; water, too, from the Book of Psalms. It is the water of the message from heaven. Let, then, this water, O Lord Jesus, come into my soul, into my flesh, that through the moisture of this rain the valleys of our minds and the fields of our hearts may grow green. May the drops from You come upon me, shedding forth grace and immortality. Wash the steps of my mind that I may not sin again. Wash the heel of my soul, that I may be able to efface the curse, that I feel not the serpent's bite Genesis 3:15 on the foot of my soul, but, as You Yourself hast bidden those who follow You, may tread on serpents and scorpions Luke 10:19 with uninjured foot. You have redeemed the world, redeem the soul of a single sinner.

This is the special excellence of your loving-kindness, by which you have redeemed the whole world person by person. Elijah was sent to one widow; Elisha cleansed one; but you, O Lord Jesus, have cleansed a thousand at this very time. How many in the city of Rome, how many at Alexandria, how many at Antioch, how many also at Constantinople! For even Constantinople has received the word of God and has received clear proofs of your judgment. For as long as she harbored the Arians' poison in her midst, troubled by neighboring wars, she rang with the clash of hostile weapons all around. But as soon as she rejected those who were foreign to the faith, she received as a suppliant the enemy himself, the judge of kings, whom she had always been accustomed to fear, she buried him when he died, and keeps him entombed there. How many, then, have you cleansed at Constantinople, how many, finally, at this very time throughout the whole world!

17. This is the special excellence of Your loving-kindness, wherewith You have redeemed the whole world one by one. Elijah was sent to one widow; Elisha cleansed one; You, O Lord Jesus, have at this day cleansed a thousand. How many in the city of Rome, how many at Alexandria, how many at Antioch, how many also at Constantinople! For even Constantinople has received the word of God, and has received evident proofs of Your judgment. For so long as she cherished the Arians' poison in her bosom, disquieted by neighbouring wars, she echoed with hostile arms around. But so soon as she rejected those who were alien from the faith she received as a suppliant the enemy himself, the judge of kings, whom she had always been wont to fear, she buried him when dead, and retains him entombed. How many, then, have You cleansed at Constantinople, how many, lastly, at this day in the whole world!

Damasus did not cleanse, Peter did not cleanse, Ambrose did not cleanse, Gregory did not cleanse. The ministry is ours, but the sacraments are Yours. What is divine cannot be granted by human power. Rather, Lord, it is Your gift and that of the Father, as You have spoken through the prophets: I will pour out of My Spirit upon all flesh, and their sons and their daughters shall prophesy. This is that symbolic dew from heaven, this is that gracious rain, as we read: A gracious rain, dividing for His inheritance. The Holy Spirit is not subject to any outside power or law, but is the Judge of His own freedom, dividing all things according to the decision of His own will, to each person, as we read, individually as He wills.

18. Damasus cleansed not, Peter cleansed not, Ambrose cleansed not, Gregory cleansed not; for ours is the ministry, but the sacraments are Yours. For it is not in man's power to confer what is divine, but it is, O Lord, Your gift and that of the Father, as You have spoken by the prophets, saying: I will pour out of My Spirit upon all flesh, and their sons and their daughters shall prophesy. Joel 2:28 This is that typical dew from heaven, this is that gracious rain, as we read: A gracious rain, dividing for His inheritance. For the Holy Spirit is not subject to any foreign power or law, but is the Arbiter of His own freedom, dividing all things according to the decision of His own will, to each, as we read, severally as He wills. 1 Corinthians 12:11

Chapter 1.

Saint Ambrose begins his argument by praising the Emperor for both his faith and for returning the Basilica to the Church. He then argues that his opponents, if they claim the Holy Spirit is not a servant, cannot deny that He is above all things. He adds that the Holy Spirit, when He said "All things serve You," showed clearly that He was distinct from created things. He supports this point with additional evidence.

St. Ambrose commences his argument by complimenting the Emperor, both for his faith and for the restitution of the Basilica to the Church; then having urged that his opponents, if they affirm that the Holy Spirit is not a servant, cannot deny Him to be above all, adds that the same Spirit, when He said, All things serve You, showed plainly that He was distinct from creatures; which point he also establishes by other evidence.

The Holy Spirit, then, is not among but above all things. For since you, most merciful Emperor, are so fully instructed concerning the Son of God that you are able to teach others yourself, I will not detain you longer, as you desire and ask to be told something more exactly concerning Him, especially since you recently showed yourself to be so pleased by an argument of this nature that you commanded the Basilica to be restored to the Church without anyone urging you.

19. The Holy Spirit, then, is not among but above all things. For (since you, most merciful Emperor, are so fully instructed concerning the Son of God as to be able yourself to teach others) I will not detain you longer, as you desire and claim to be told something more exactly [concerning Him], especially since you lately showed yourself to be so pleased by an argument of this nature, as to command the Basilica to be restored to the Church without any one urging you.

So then, we have received the grace of your faith and the reward of our own, for we cannot say otherwise than that it was by the grace of the Holy Spirit that when everyone was unaware of it, you suddenly restored the basilica. This is the gift, I say, this is the work of the Holy Spirit, who was indeed being preached by us at that time, but was working in you.

20. So, then, we have received the grace of your faith and the reward of our own; for we cannot say otherwise than that it was of the grace of the Holy Spirit, that when all were unconscious of it, you suddenly restored the Basilica. This is the gift, I say, this the work of the Holy Spirit, Who indeed was at that time preached by us, but was working in you.

And I do not regret the losses of the previous time, since the seizure of that Basilica resulted in gaining something like interest on a loan. For you seized the Basilica so that you might give proof of your faith. And so your piety fulfilled its intention, which had seized it in order to give proof, and in giving proof you restored it. I did not lose the fruit, and I have your judgment, and it has been made clear to all that, with a certain variety of action, there was in you no variety of opinion. It was made clear, I say, to all, that it was not of your own will that you seized it, but it was of your own will when you restored it.

21. And I do not regret the losses of the previous time, since the sequestration of that Basilica resulted in the gain of a sort of usury. For you sequestrated the Basilica, that you might give proof of your faith. And so your piety fulfilled its intention, which had sequestered that it might give proof, and so gave proof as to restore. I did not lose the fruit, and I have your judgment, and it has been made clear to all that, with a certain diversity of action, there was in you no diversity of opinion. It was made clear, I say, to all, that it was not of yourself that you sequestrated, that it was of yourself when you restored it.

I will now demonstrate with evidence what I have said. The first point in the discussion is that all things serve. Now it is clear that all things serve, since it is written: All things serve You. The Spirit said this through the prophet. He did not say, We serve, but, serve You, so that you might believe that He Himself is excepted from serving. Therefore, since all things serve, and the Spirit does not serve, the Holy Spirit is certainly not included among all things.

22. Now let us establish by evidence what we have said. The first point in the discussion is that all things serve. Now it is clear that all things serve, since it is written: All things serve You. This the Spirit said through the prophet. He did not say, We serve, but, serve You, that you might believe that He Himself is excepted from serving. So, then, since all things serve, and the Spirit does not serve, the Holy Spirit is certainly not included among all things.

For if we say that the Holy Spirit is included among all things, certainly when we read that the Spirit searches the deep things of God, we deny that God the Father is over all. For since the Spirit is of God and is the Spirit of His mouth, how can we say that the Holy Spirit is included among all things, seeing that God, whose the Spirit is, is over all, possessing certainly fullness of perfection and perfect power?

23. For if we say that the Holy Spirit is included among all things, certainly when we read that the Spirit searches the deep things of God, 1 Corinthians 2:10 we deny that God the Father is over all. For since the Spirit is of God, and is the Spirit of His mouth, how can we say that the Holy Spirit is included among all things, seeing that God, Whose is the Spirit, is over all, possessing certainly fullness of perfection and perfect power.

However, in case the objectors think that the Apostle made a mistake, they should learn whose authority he followed for his belief. The Lord said in the Gospel: "When the Paraclete has come, whom I will send to you from my Father, even the Spirit of Truth who proceeds from the Father, he shall bear witness of me." So the Holy Spirit both proceeds from the Father and bears witness of the Son. For the witness who is both faithful and true bears witness of the Father—and nothing expresses the Divine Majesty more fully than this witness, nothing declares the Unity of the Divine Power more clearly, since the Spirit has the same knowledge as the Son, who is the witness and inseparable sharer of the Father's secrets.

25. But lest the objectors should think that the Apostle was in error, let them learn whom he followed as his authority for his belief. The Lord said in the Gospel: When the Paraclete has come, Whom I will send to you from My Father, even the Spirit of Truth which proceeds from the Father, He shall bear witness of Me. John 15:26 So the Holy Spirit both proceeds from the Father, and bears witness of the Son. For the witness Who is both faithful and true bears witness of the Father, than which witness nothing is more full for the expression of the Divine Majesty, nothing more clear as to the Unity of the Divine Power, since the Spirit has the same knowledge as the Son, Who is the witness and inseparable sharer of the Father's secrets.

He excludes, then, the fellowship and number of creatures from the knowledge of God, but by not excluding the Holy Spirit, He shows that the Spirit is not part of the fellowship of creatures. So the passage we read in the Gospel—"For no one has seen God at any time, except the Only-begotten Son Who is in the bosom of the Father; He has declared Him"—also applies to the exclusion of the Holy Spirit. For how has He not seen God when He searches even the deep things of God? How has He not seen God when He knows the things which belong to God? How has He not seen God when He is from God? Therefore, since it is established that no one has seen God at any time, yet the Holy Spirit has seen Him, clearly the Holy Spirit is excepted from this statement. He, then, is above all who is excluded from all.

26. He excludes, then, the fellowship and number of creatures from the knowledge of God, but by not excluding the Holy Spirit, He shows that He is not of the fellowship of creatures. So that the passage which is read in the Gospel: For no man has seen God at any time, save the Only-begotten Son Who is in the bosom of the Father He has declared Him, also pertains to the exclusion of the Holy Spirit. For how has He not seen God Who searches even the deep things of God? How has He not seen God Who knows the things which are of God? How has He not seen God Who is of God? So, since it is laid down that no one has seen God at any time, whereas the Holy Spirit has seen Him, clearly the Holy Spirit is excepted. He, then, is above all Who is excluded from all.

Chapter 2.

The statement "All things were made by Him" does not prove that the Holy Spirit is included among all things, since He was not made. If we used that logic, we could use other passages to prove that the Son, and even the Father Himself, must be counted among all things, which would be equally irreverent.

The words, All things were made by Him, are not a proof that the Holy Spirit is included among all things, since He was not made. For otherwise it could be proved by other passages that the Son, and even the Father Himself, must be numbered among all things, which would be similar irreverence.

This appears to me, gracious Emperor, to be a complete explanation of our correct belief, but to the impious it does not seem so. Notice what they are trying to achieve. For the heretics are accustomed to say that the Holy Spirit must be counted among all things, because it is written about God the Son: All things were made by Him.

27. This seems, gracious Emperor, to be a full account of our right feeling, but to the impious it does not seem so. Observe what they are striving after. For the heretics are wont to say that the Holy Spirit is to be reckoned among all things, because it is written of God the Son: All things were made by Him. John 1:3

How utterly confused is a line of reasoning that does not hold to the truth and is caught up in a backward order of statements. For this argument would have value for claiming that the Holy Spirit is among all things if they could prove that He was made. Scripture says that all things which were made were made by the Son, but since we are not taught that the Holy Spirit was made, He certainly cannot be proven to be among all things—He who was neither made as all things are, nor created. For me this testimony is useful for establishing both points: first, that He is proven to be above all things because He was not made; and second, that because He is above all things, it is clear He was not made and is not to be numbered among those things which were made.

28. How utterly confused is a course of argument which does not hold to the truth, and is involved in an inverted order of statements. For this argument would be of value for the statement that the Holy Spirit is among all things, if they proved that He was made. For Scripture says that all things which were made were made by the Son; but since we are not taught that the Holy Spirit was made, He certainly cannot be proved to be among all things Who was neither made as all things are, nor created. To me this testimony is of use for establishing each point; firstly, that He is proved to be above all things, because He was not made; and secondly, that because He is above all things, He is seen not to have been made, and is not to be numbered among those things which were made.

If someone argues that because the Evangelist stated all things were made by the Word without making an exception for the Holy Spirit (even though the Spirit of God speaking in John said "all things were made by Him" and did not say "we were all things which were made," while the Lord Himself clearly showed that the Spirit of God spoke in the Evangelists, saying "For it will not be you that speak, but the Spirit of your Father that speaks in you"), yet if someone, as I said, does not make an exception for the Holy Spirit in this passage but counts Him among all things, then he consequently should not make an exception for the Son of God in that passage where the Apostle says "Yet to us there is one God the Father, of Whom are all things, and we by Him." But so that he may know that the Son is not among all things, let him read what follows, for when the Apostle says "And one Lord Jesus Christ, by Whom are all things," he certainly excludes the Son of God from all things, just as he also excluded the Father.

29. But if any one, because the Evangelist stated that all things were made by the Word, making no exception of the Holy Spirit (although the Spirit of God speaking in John said: All things were made by Him, and said not we were all things which were made; while the Lord Himself distinctly showed that the Spirit of God spoke in the Evangelists, saying, For it will not be you that speak, but the Spirit of your Father that speaks in you), Matthew 10:20 yet if any one, as I said, does not except the Holy Spirit in this place, but numbers Him among all, he consequently does not except the Son of God in that passage where the Apostle says: Yet to us there is one God the Father, of Whom are all things, and we by Him. 1 Corinthians 8:6 But that he may know that the Son is not among all things, let him read what follows, for when he says: And one Lord Jesus Christ, by Whom are all things, 1 Corinthians 8:6 he certainly excepts the Son of God from all, who also excepted the Father.

30. But it is equally irreverent to diminish the dignity of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit. For anyone who does not believe in the Son does not believe in the Father, and anyone who does not believe in the Spirit does not believe in the Son of God, nor can faith stand without the rule of truth. For whoever begins to deny the oneness of power in the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit certainly cannot prove his divided faith in matters where there is no division. Therefore, just as complete piety is to believe rightly, so complete impiety is to believe wrongly.

30. But it is equal irreverence to detract from the dignity of the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit. For he believes not in the Father who does not believe in the Son, nor does he believe in the Son of God who does not believe in the Spirit, nor can faith stand without the rule of truth. For he who has begun to deny the oneness of power in the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit certainly cannot prove his divided faith in points where there is no division. So, then, since complete piety is to believe rightly, so complete impiety is to believe wrongly.

Those who believe the Holy Spirit should be counted among all things—because they read that all things were made by the Son—must also think that the Son should be counted among all things, because they read: "All things are of God." Consequently, they also fail to separate the Father from all things if they do not separate the Son from all creatures, since just as all things are of the Father, so too all things are by the Son. And the Apostle, because of his foresight in the Spirit, used this very expression to avoid seeming to the impious—who had heard the Son say, "That which My Father has given Me is greater than all"—to have included the Son among all.

31. Therefore they who think that the Holy Spirit ought to be numbered among all things, because they read that all things were made by the Son, must needs also think that the Son is to be numbered among all things, because they read: All things are of God. 2 Corinthians 5:18 But, consequently, they also do not separate the Father from all things, who do not separate the Son from all creatures, since, as all things are of the Father, so, too, all things are by the Son. And the Apostle, because of his foresight in the Spirit, used this very expression, lest he should seem to the impious who had heard that the Son had said, That which My Father has given Me is greater than all, John 10:29 to have included the Son among all.

Chapter 3.

The Apostle's statement that all things come from the Father through the Son does not exclude the Spirit from their fellowship, since what is said about one Person also applies to each. Therefore, those baptized in the Name of Christ are considered baptized in the Name of the Father and of the Holy Spirit, provided there is belief in the Three Persons—otherwise the baptism is invalid. This principle also applies to baptism in the Name of the Holy Spirit. If the Holy Spirit is separated from the Father and the Son because of one passage, it would necessarily follow from other passages that the Father would be subordinated to the Son. The Son is worshipped by angels, not by the Spirit, for the Spirit is His witness, not His servant. When the Son is spoken of as being before all things, this refers to created things. The great dignity of the Holy Spirit is demonstrated by the fact that sin against Him cannot be forgiven. The text will explain how such sin cannot be forgiven and how the Spirit is one.

The statement of the Apostle, that all things are of the Father by the Son, does not separate the Spirit from Their company, since what is referred to one Person is also attributed to each. So those baptized in the Name of Christ are held to be baptized in the Name of the Father and of the Holy Spirit, if, that is, there is belief in the Three Persons, otherwise the baptism will be null. This also applies to baptism in the Name of the Holy Spirit. If because of one passage the Holy Spirit is separated from the Father and the Son, it will necessarily follow from other passages that the Father will be subordinated to the Son. The Son is worshipped by angels, not by the Spirit, for the latter is His witness, not His servant. Where the Son is spoken of as being before all, it is to be understood of creatures. The great dignity of the Holy Spirit is proved by the absence of forgiveness for the sin against Him. How it is that such sin cannot be forgiven, and how the Spirit is one.

But perhaps someone may say that there was a reason why the writer said that all things were of the Father and all things through the Son, but made no mention of the Holy Spirit, and would use this as the foundation of an argument. However, if he persists in his twisted interpretation, in how many passages will he find the power of the Holy Spirit declared, in which Scripture has stated nothing concerning either the Father or the Son, but has left it to be understood?

32. But perhaps some one may say that there was a reason why the writer said that all things were of the Father, and all things through the Son, 1 Corinthians 8:6 but made no mention of the Holy Spirit, and would obtain the foundation of an argument from this. But if he persists in his perverse interpretation, in how many passages will he find the power of the Holy Spirit asserted, in which Scripture has stated nothing concerning either the Father or the Son, but has left it to be understood?

Where, then, the grace of the Spirit is asserted, is that of God the Father or of the Only-begotten Son denied? Absolutely not. For just as the Father is in the Son, and the Son in the Father, so too the love of God is poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. And just as someone who is blessed in Christ is blessed in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, because the Name is one and the Power is one, so too when any divine operation—whether of the Father, or of the Son, or of the Holy Spirit—is discussed, it is not attributed only to the Holy Spirit, but also to the Father and the Son, and not only to the Father, but also to the Son and the Spirit.

40. Where, then, the grace of the Spirit is asserted, is that of God the Father or of the Only-begotten Son denied? By no means; for as the Father is in the Son, and the Son in the Father, so, too, the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, Who has been given us. Romans 5:5 And as he who is blessed in Christ is blessed in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, because the Name is one and the Power one; so, too, when any divine operation, whether of the Father, or of the Son, or of the Holy Spirit, is treated of, it is not referred only to the Holy Spirit, but also to the Father and the Son, and not only to the Father, but also to the Son and the Spirit.

The Ethiopian eunuch of Queen Candace, when baptized in Christ, obtained the fullness of the sacrament. Those who said they knew nothing of any Holy Spirit, even though they claimed to have been baptized with John's baptism, were baptized again afterward. This is because John baptized for the forgiveness of sins in the Name of the coming Jesus, not in his own name. Therefore they did not know the Spirit, because in the form in which John baptized, they had not received baptism in the Name of Christ. For John, though he did not baptize in the Spirit, still preached Christ and the Spirit. When he was asked whether he might himself be the Christ, he answered: I baptize you with water, but one stronger than I will come, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. Therefore, because they had been baptized neither in the Name of Christ nor with faith in the Holy Spirit, they could not receive the sacrament of baptism.

41. Then, too, the Ethiopian eunuch of Queen Candace, when baptized in Christ, obtained the fullness of the sacrament. And they who said that they knew not of any Holy Spirit, although they said that they had been baptized with John's baptism, were baptized afterwards, because John baptized for the remission of sins in the Name of the coming Jesus, not in his own. And so they knew not the Spirit, because in the form in which John baptized they had not received baptism in the Name of Christ. For John, though he did not baptize in the Spirit, nevertheless preached Christ and the Spirit. And then, when he was questioned whether he were perchance himself the Christ, he answered: I baptize you with water, but a stronger than I shall come, Whose shoes I am not worthy to bear, He shall baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. They therefore, because they had been baptized neither in the Name of Christ nor with faith in the Holy Spirit, could not receive the sacrament of baptism.

So they were baptized in the Name of Jesus Christ, and baptism was not repeated in their case but administered differently, since there is only one baptism. But where the complete sacrament of baptism is not present, there is considered to be neither a beginning nor any kind of baptism at all. Baptism is complete if one confesses the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. If you deny one, you overthrow the whole thing. And just as when you mention in words only one—either the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit—yet in your belief you do not deny either the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit, the mystery of the faith is complete, so too, even if you name the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit but diminish the power of either the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit, the whole mystery is emptied of meaning. And finally, those who had said, "We have not heard if there is any Holy Spirit," were baptized afterward in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ. And this was an additional abundance of grace, because now through Paul's preaching they knew the Holy Spirit.

42. So they were baptized in the Name of Jesus Christ, and baptism was not repeated in their case, but administered differently, for there is but one baptism. But where there is not the complete sacrament of baptism, there is not considered to be a commencement nor any kind of baptism. But baptism is complete if one confess the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. If you deny One you overthrow the whole. And just as if you mention in words One only, either the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit, and in your belief do not deny either the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit, the mystery of the faith is complete, so, too, although you name the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and lessen the power of either the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit, the whole mystery is made empty. And, lastly, they who had said: We have not heard if there be any Holy Spirit, were baptized afterwards in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ. And this was an additional abundance of grace, for now through Paul's preaching they knew the Holy Spirit.

Nor should it seem contradictory that although the Spirit is not mentioned afterward, He is still believed in, and what had not been stated in words is expressed in belief. For when it is said "In the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ," the mystery is complete through the oneness of the Name, and the Spirit is not separated from the baptism of Christ, since John baptized unto repentance, but Christ baptizes in the Spirit.

43. Nor ought it to seem opposed to this, that although subsequently mention is not made of the Spirit, He is yet believed in, and what had not been mentioned in words is expressed in belief. For when it is said, In the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, the mystery is complete through the oneness of the Name, and the Spirit is not separated from the baptism of Christ, since John baptized unto repentance, Christ in the Spirit.

Let us now consider whether, just as we read that the sacrament of baptism in the Name of Christ was complete, so too when the Holy Spirit alone is named, anything is lacking from the completeness of the mystery. Let us follow the argument that whoever has named One has signified the Trinity. If you name Christ, you imply both God the Father by whom the Son was anointed, and the Son Himself who was anointed, and the Holy Spirit with whom He was anointed. For it is written: This Jesus of Nazareth, whom God anointed with the Holy Spirit. And if you name the Father, you equally denote His Son and the Spirit of His mouth, if you truly grasp this in your heart. And if you speak of the Spirit, you also name God the Father, from whom the Spirit proceeds, and the Son, since He is also the Spirit of the Son.

44. Let us now consider whether as we read that the sacrament of baptism in the Name of Christ was complete, so, too, when the Holy Spirit alone is named, anything is wanting to the completeness of the mystery. Let us follow out the argument that he who has named One has signified the Trinity. If you name Christ, you imply both God the Father by Whom the Son was anointed, and the Son Himself Who was anointed, and the Holy Spirit with Whom He was anointed. For it is written: This Jesus of Nazareth, Whom God anointed with the Holy Spirit. Acts 10:38 And if you name the Father, you denote equally His Son and the Spirit of His mouth, if, that is, you apprehend it in your heart. And if you speak of the Spirit, you name also God the Father, from Whom the Spirit proceeds, and the Son, inasmuch as He is also the Spirit of the Son.

Therefore, so that reason may be supported by authority, Scripture shows that we can also be rightly baptized in the Spirit, when the Lord says: "But you shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit." And in another place the Apostle says: "For we were all baptized in the body itself into one Spirit." The work is one, for the mystery is one; the baptism is one, for there was one death on behalf of the world. There is, then, a oneness of working, a oneness of setting forth, which cannot be separated.

45. Wherefore that authority may also be joined to reason Scripture indicates that we can also be rightly baptized in the Spirit, when the Lord says: But you shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit. Acts 1:5 And in another place the Apostle says: For we were all baptized in the body itself into one Spirit. 1 Corinthians 12:13 The work is one, for the mystery is one; the baptism one, for there was one death on behalf of the world; there is, then, a oneness of working, a oneness of setting forth, which cannot be separated.

If in this passage the Spirit is separated from the work of the Father and the Son because it says "All things are of God, and all things are through the Son," then by the same reasoning, when the Apostle says of Christ, "Who is over all, God blessed for ever," he would be placing Christ not only above all created things but also (which would be blasphemous to say) above the Father himself. But God forbid, for the Father is not included among all things, is not counted among a collection of his own creatures. The entire creation is below, while above all is the Godhead of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The creation serves, while the Godhead rules; the creation is subject, while the Godhead reigns; the creation is the work, while the Godhead is the author of the work; the creation without exception worships, while the Godhead is worshipped by all without exception.

46. But if in this place the Spirit be separated from the operation of the Father and the Son, because it is said, All things are of God, and all things are through the Son, 1 Corinthians 8:6 then, too, when the Apostle says of Christ, Who is over all, God blessed for ever, Romans 9:5 He set Christ not only above all creatures, but (which it is impious to say) above the Father also. But God forbid, for the Father is not among all things, is not among a kind of crowd of His own creatures. The whole creation is below, over all is the Godhead of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The former serves, the latter rules; the former is subject, the latter reigns; the former is the work, the latter the author of the work; the former, without exception, worships, the latter is worshipped by all without exception.

Finally, concerning the Son it is written: And let all the angels of God worship Him. You do not find it written, Let the Holy Spirit worship. And further on: To which of the angels did He say at any time, Sit on My right hand until I make your enemies the footstool of your feet? Are they not all, he says, ministering spirits who are sent to minister? When he says all, does he include the Holy Spirit? Certainly not, because angels and the other Powers are destined to serve in ministering and obedience to the Son of God.

47. Lastly, of the Son it is written: And let all the angels of God worship Him. Hebrews 1:6 You do not find, Let the Holy Spirit worship. And farther on: To which of the angels said He at any time, Sit on My right hand till I make your enemies the footstool of your feet? Are they not all, says he, ministering spirits who are sent to minister? Hebrews 1:14 When he says All, does he include the Holy Spirit? Certainly not, because Angels and the other Powers are destined to serve in ministering and obedience to the Son of God.

In reality, the Holy Spirit is not a minister but a witness of the Son, as the Son Himself said of Him: He shall bear witness of Me. The Spirit, then, is a witness of the Son. He who is a witness knows all things, just as God the Father is a witness. For you read in later passages that our salvation was confirmed to us by God bearing witness through signs and wonders and through manifold powers and through distributions of the Holy Spirit. He who divides as He wills is certainly above all, not among all, for to divide is the gift of the worker, not an inherent part of the work itself.

48. But in truth the Holy Spirit is not a minister but a witness of the Son, as the Son Himself said of Him: He shall bear witness of Me. John 15:26 The Spirit, then, is a witness of the Son. He who is a witness knows all things, as God the Father is a witness. For so you read in later passages, for our salvation was confirmed to us by God bearing witness by signs and wonders and by manifold powers and by distributions of the Holy Spirit. Hebrews 2:3-4 He who divides as he will is certainly above all, not among all, for to divide is the gift of the worker, not an innate part of the work itself.

If the Son is above all—through whom our salvation began so that it might be preached—then certainly God the Father also, who testifies and gives confirmation concerning our salvation by signs and wonders, is excepted from all. In the same way, the Spirit, who bears witness to our salvation by His diverse gifts, is not to be numbered among the crowd of creatures but to be reckoned together with the Father and the Son. When He divides, He is not Himself divided by cutting off part of Himself, for being indivisible He loses nothing when He gives to all, just as the Son loses nothing when the Father receives the kingdom, nor does the Father suffer loss when He gives what is His to the Son. We know, then, by the testimony of the Son that there is no loss in the division of spiritual grace, for He who breathes where He wills is everywhere free from loss. We shall speak more fully about this power further on.

49. If the Son is above all, through Whom our salvation received its commencement, so that it might be preached, certainly God the Father also, Who testifies and gives confirmation concerning our salvation by signs and wonders, is excepted from all. In like manner the Spirit, Who bears witness to our salvation by His diversities of gifts, is not to be numbered with the crowd of creatures, but to be reckoned with the Father and the Son; Who, when He divides, is not Himself divided by cutting off Himself, for being indivisible He loses nothing when He gives to all, as also the Son, when the Father receives the kingdom, 1 Corinthians 15:24 loses nothing, nor does the Father, when He gives that which is His to the Son, suffer loss. We know, then, by the testimony of the Son that there is no loss in the division of spiritual grace; for He Who breathes where He wills John 3:8 is everywhere free from loss. Concerning which power we shall speak more fully farther on.

Meanwhile, since our goal is to prove in proper order that the Spirit is not to be counted among all things, let us use the Apostle, whose words they dispute, as our authority for this position. For what "all things" would be, whether visible or invisible, he himself declared when he said: "For in Him were all things created in the heavens and in earth." You see that "all things" refers to things in the heavens and things on earth, for in the heavens there are also invisible things that were made.

50. In the meanwhile, since our intention is to prove in due order that the Spirit is not to be reckoned among all things, let us take the Apostle, whose words they call in question, as an authority for this position. For what all things would be, whether visible or invisible, he himself declared when he said: For in Him were all things created in the heavens and in earth. Colossians 1:16 You see that all things is spoken of things in the heavens, and of things in earth, for in the heavens are also invisible things which were made.

51. But to make sure no one misunderstands, Paul added specifically who he was talking about: Whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers, all things were created by Him and in Him, and He is before all, and in Him all things consist. Does Paul, then, include the Holy Spirit here among created things? Or when he says the Son of God is before all things, should we suppose he meant the Son is before the Father? Certainly not. Just as Paul says here that all things were created by the Son and that all things in the heavens hold together in Him, so too it cannot be doubted that all things in the heavens have their strength in the Holy Spirit, since we read: By the word of the Lord were the heavens established and all the strength of them by the Spirit of His mouth. Therefore, He is above all things, since from Him comes all the strength of things in heaven and things on earth. He who is above all things certainly does not serve. He who does not serve is free. He who is free has the right of lordship.

51. But that no one should be ignorant of this he added those of whom he was speaking: Whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers, all things were created by Him and in Him, and He is before all, and in Him all things consist. Colossians 1:16-17 Does he, then, include the Holy Spirit here among creatures? Or when he says that the Son of God is before all things, is he to be supposed to have said that He is before the Father? Certainly not; for as here he says that all things were created by the Son, and that all things in the heavens consist in Him, so, too, it cannot be doubted that all things in the heavens have their strength in the Holy Spirit, since we read: By the word of the Lord were the heavens established and all the strength of them by the Spirit of His mouth. He, then, is above all, from Whom is all the strength of things in heaven and things on earth. He, then, Who is above all things certainly does not serve; He Who serves not is free; He Who is free has the prerogative of lordship.

If I were to say this at the outset, it would be denied. But just as they deny the lesser point so that the greater one will not be believed, let us likewise present the lesser matters first. This way they will either show their lack of faith regarding these lesser matters, or if they grant the lesser points, we can draw conclusions about the greater from the lesser.

52. If I were to say this at first it would be denied. But in the same manner as they deny the less that the greater may not be believed, so let us set forth lesser matters first that either they may show their perfidy in lesser matters, or, if they grant the lesser matters, we may infer greater from the lesser.

I believe, most merciful Emperor, that those who dare to count the Holy Spirit among all created things are thoroughly refuted. But so they may know they are challenged not only by the testimony of the apostles but also by that of our Lord: how can they dare to count the Holy Spirit among all created things, when the Lord Himself said: "Whoever blasphemes against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come"? How, then, can anyone dare to count the Holy Spirit among creatures? Or who will be so blind as to think that if he has harmed any creature, he cannot possibly be forgiven? For if the Jews were deprived of divine protection because they worshiped the host of heaven, while the one who worships and confesses the Holy Spirit is accepted by God, but the one who does not confess Him is convicted of unforgivable sacrilege—then it certainly follows from this that the Holy Spirit cannot be counted among all created things, but that He is above all things, since an offense against Him is punished by eternal condemnation.

53. I think, most merciful Emperor, that they are most fully confuted who dare to reckon the Holy Spirit among all things. But that they may know that they are pressed not only by the testimony of the apostles, but also by that of our Lord; how can they dare to reckon the Holy Spirit among all things, since the Lord Himself said: He who shall blaspheme against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but he who shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven, either here or hereafter. Matthew 12:32 How, then, can any one dare to reckon the Holy Spirit among creatures? Or who will so blind himself as to think that if he have injured any creature he cannot be forgiven in any wise? For if the Jews because they worshipped the host of heaven were deprived of divine protection, while he who worships and confesses the Holy Spirit is accepted of God, but he who confesses Him not is convicted of sacrilege without forgiveness: certainly it follows from this that the Holy Spirit cannot be reckoned among all things, but that He is above all things, an offense against Whom is avenged by eternal punishment.

54. But notice carefully why the Lord said: He who shall blaspheme against the Son of Man it shall be forgiven him, but he who shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven, either here or hereafter. Is an offense against the Son different from one against the Holy Spirit? For just as their dignity is one and shared by both, so also is the offense. But if anyone, misled by seeing the visible human body, should think less seriously than is appropriate about the Body of Christ (though it should not seem unimportant to us, since it is the temple of purity and the fruit of the Virgin), that person does incur guilt, but is not excluded from pardon, which can be obtained through faith. But if anyone denies the dignity, majesty, and eternal power of the Holy Spirit, and thinks that demons are cast out not in the Spirit of God but in Beelzebub, there can be no obtaining pardon where there is complete sacrilege. For whoever has denied the Spirit has also denied the Father and the Son, since the Spirit of God is the same as the Spirit of Christ.

54. But observe carefully why the Lord said: He who shall blaspheme against the Son of Man it shall be forgiven him, but he who shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven, either here or hereafter. Matthew 12:32 Is an offense against the Son different from one against the Holy Spirit? For as their dignity is one, and common to both, so too is the offense. But if any one, led astray by the visible human body, should think somewhat more remissly than is fitting concerning the Body of Christ (for it ought not to appear of little worth to us, seeing it is the palace of chastity, and the fruit of the Virgin), he incurs guilt, but he is not shut out from pardon, which he may attain to by faith. But if any one should deny the dignity, majesty, and eternal power of the Holy Spirit, and should think that devils are cast out not in the Spirit of God, but in Beelzebub, there can be no attaining of pardon there where is the fullness of sacrilege; for he who has denied the Spirit has denied also the Father and the Son, since the same is the Spirit of God Who is the Spirit of Christ.

Chapter 4.

The Holy Spirit is one and the same who spoke in the prophets and apostles, who is the Spirit of God and of Christ. Scripture also calls him the Paraclete, and the Spirit of life and truth.

The Holy Spirit is one and the same Who spoke in the prophets and apostles, Who is the Spirit of God and of Christ; Whom, further, Scripture designates the Paraclete, and the Spirit of life and truth.

55. But no one will doubt that the Spirit is one, although very many have doubted whether God is one. For many heretics have said that the God of the Old Testament is one, and the God of the New Testament is another. But just as the Father is one Who both spoke long ago, as we read, to the fathers through the prophets, and to us in the last days through His Son; and just as the Son is one, Who according to the witness of the Old Testament was offended by Adam, seen by Abraham, and worshipped by Jacob; so too, the Holy Spirit is one, who worked in the prophets, was breathed upon the apostles, and was joined to the Father and the Son in the sacrament of baptism. For David says of Him: And take not Your Holy Spirit from me. And in another place he said of Him: Where shall I go from Your Spirit?

55. But no one will doubt that the Spirit is one, although very many have doubted whether God be one. For many heretics have said that the God of the Old Testament is one, and the God of the New Testament is another. But as the Father is one Who both spoke of old, as we read, to the fathers by the prophets, and to us in the last days by His Son; Hebrews 1:1-2 and as the Son is one, Who according to the tenour of the Old Testament was offended by Adam, Genesis 3:17 seen by Abraham, Genesis 18:22-23 worshipped by Jacob; Genesis 28:17 so, too, the Holy Spirit is one, who energized in the prophets, 2 Peter 1:21 was breathed upon the apostles, John 20:22 and was joined to the Father and the Son in the sacrament of baptism. Matthew 28:19 For David says of Him: And take not Your Holy Spirit from me. And in another place he said of Him: Whither shall I go from Your Spirit?

So that you may know that the Spirit of God is the same as the Holy Spirit, we also read in the Apostle: "No one speaking in the Spirit of God says Anathema to Jesus" and "no one can say, Lord Jesus, but in the Holy Spirit." The Apostle calls Him the Spirit of God. He also called Him the Spirit of Christ, as you read: "But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwells in you." And further on: "But if the Spirit of Him Who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you." Therefore, the Spirit of God is the same as the Spirit of Christ.

56. That you may know that the Spirit of God is the same as the Holy Spirit, as we read also in the Apostle: No one speaking in the Spirit of God says Anathema to Jesus and no one can say, Lord Jesus, but in the Holy Spirit, 1 Corinthians 12:3 the Apostle calls Him the Spirit of God. He called Him also the Spirit of Christ, as you read: But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwells in you. Romans 8:9 And farther on: But if the Spirit of Him Who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you. Romans 8:11 The same is, then, the Spirit of God, Who is the Spirit of Christ.

The Spirit is also the Spirit of Life, as the Apostle says: For the law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus has delivered me from the law of sin and death. Romans 8:2

57. The same is also the Spirit of Life, as the Apostle says: For the law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus has delivered me from the law of sin and death. Romans 8:2

58. The Apostle called Him the Spirit of Life, and in the Gospel the Lord called Him the Paraclete and the Spirit of Truth, as you can see: "And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Comforter [Paraclete], that He may be with you for ever, even the Spirit of Truth, Whom this world cannot receive; because it sees Him not, neither knows Him." So you have the Paraclete Spirit, Who is also called the Spirit of Truth, and the invisible Spirit. How, then, can some people think that the Son is visible in His divine physis, when the world cannot even see the Spirit?

58. Him, then, Whom the Apostle called the Spirit of Life, the Lord in the Gospel named the Paraclete, and the Spirit of Truth, as you find: And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Comforter [Paraclete], that He may be with you for ever, even the Spirit of Truth, Whom this world cannot receive; because it sees Him not, neither knows Him. John 14:16-17 You have, then, the Paraclete Spirit, called also the Spirit of Truth, and the invisible Spirit. How, then, do some think that the Son is visible in His Divine Nature, when the world cannot see even the Spirit?

Understand now from the Lord's own words that the Holy Spirit is the same as the Spirit of Truth, for you read at the end of this book: Receive the Holy Spirit. And Peter teaches that the Holy Spirit is the same as the Spirit of the Lord when he says: Ananias, why have you thought it good to tempt and to lie to the Holy Spirit? And immediately afterward he says again to Ananias's wife: Why have you thought it good to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? When he speaks to her, he shows that he is talking about the same Spirit of Whom he had spoken to Ananias. He Himself is, therefore, the Spirit of the Lord Who is the Holy Spirit.

59. Receive now the saying of the Lord, that the same is the Holy Spirit Who is the Spirit of Truth, for you read in the end of this book: Receive the Holy Spirit. John 20:22 And Peter teaches that the same is the Holy Spirit Who is the Spirit of the Lord, when he says: Ananias, why has it seemed good to you to tempt and to lie to the Holy Spirit? Acts 5:3 And immediately after he says again to the wife of Ananias: Why has it seemed good to you to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? Acts 5:9 When he says to you, he shows that he is speaking of the same Spirit of Whom he had spoken to Ananias. He Himself is, then, the Spirit of the Lord Who is the Holy Spirit.

The Lord Himself made clear that the one who is the Spirit of the Father is the same as the Holy Spirit. According to Matthew, He said that we should not worry during persecution about what we should say: "For it is not you that speak, but the Spirit of your Father that speaks in you." Again, according to Luke, He says: "Be not anxious how you shall answer or speak, for the Holy Spirit of God shall teach you in that hour what you ought to say." So although many are called spirits, as it is written: "Who makes His Angels spirits," the Spirit of God is only one.

60. And the Lord Himself made clear that the same Who is the Spirit of the Father is the Holy Spirit, when according to Matthew He said that we ought not to take thought in persecution what we should say: For it is not you that speak, but the Spirit of your Father that speaks in you. Matthew 10:20 Again He says according to St. Luke: Be not anxious how you shall answer or speak, for the Holy Spirit of God shall teach you in that hour what you ought to say. Luke 12:11-12 So, although many are called spirits, as it is said: Who makes His Angels spirits, yet the Spirit of God is but one.

Both apostles and prophets received that one Spirit, as the chosen vessel, the teacher of the Gentiles, says: "For we have all drunk of one Spirit." They received Him who cannot be divided, but who is poured into souls and flows into the senses, so that He may quench the burning thirst of this world.

61. Both apostles and prophets received that one Spirit, as the vessel of election, the Doctor of the Gentiles, says: For we have all drunk of one Spirit; 1 Corinthians 12:13 Him, as it were, Who cannot be divided, but is poured into souls, and flows into the senses, that He may quench the burning of this world's thirst.

Chapter 5.

The Holy Spirit, since He sanctifies creatures, is neither a creature nor subject to change. He is always good, since He is given by the Father and the Son, and He is not to be numbered among things that are said to fail. He must be acknowledged as the source of goodness. He is the Spirit of God's mouth, the amender of evils, and Himself good. Finally, since He is called good in Scripture and is joined with the Father and the Son in baptism, He cannot possibly be denied to be good. However, He is not said to progress but to be made perfect in goodness, which distinguishes Him from all creatures.

The Holy Spirit, since He sanctifies creatures, is neither a creature nor subject to change. He is always good, since He is given by the Father and the Son; neither is He to be numbered among such things as are said to fail. He must be acknowledged as the source of goodness. The Spirit of God 's mouth, the amender of evils, and Himself good. Lastly, as He is said in Scripture to be good, and is joined to the Father and the Son in baptism, He cannot possibly be denied to be good. He is not, however, said to progress, but to be made perfect in goodness, which distinguishes Him from all creatures.

The Holy Spirit is not, then, of the substance of bodily things, for He pours out incorporeal grace on bodily things. Nor is He of the substance of invisible creatures, for they receive His sanctification, and through Him are superior to the other works of the universe. Whether you speak of Angels, or Dominions, or Powers, every creature waits for the grace of the Holy Spirit. For just as we are children through the Spirit, because God sent the Spirit of His Son into our hearts crying, "Abba, Father," so that you are now not a servant but a son, in the same way, every creature is waiting for the revelation of the sons of God, whom in truth the grace of the Holy Spirit made sons of God. Therefore, every creature itself shall be changed by the revelation of the grace of the Spirit, and shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.

62. The Holy Spirit is not, then, of the substance of things corporeal, for He sheds incorporeal grace on corporeal things; nor, again, is He of the substance of invisible creatures, for they receive His sanctification, and through Him are superior to the other works of the universe. Whether you speak of Angels, or Dominions, or Powers, every creature waits for the grace of the Holy Spirit. For as we are children through the Spirit, because God sent the Spirit of His Son into our hearts crying, Abba, Father; so that you are now not a servant but a son; Galatians 4:6-7 in like manner, also, every creature is waiting for the revelation of the sons of God, whom in truth the grace of the Holy Spirit made sons of God. Therefore, also, every creature itself shall be changed by the revelation of the grace of the Spirit, and shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.

Every creature, then, is subject to change—not only those that have been changed by some sin or condition of external elements, but also those that can be liable to corruption by a fault of nature, even though through careful discipline they have not yet experienced such corruption. For, as we have shown in an earlier treatise, the nature of Angels can evidently be changed. It is certainly fitting to judge that whatever the nature of one is, so also is the nature of others. The nature of the rest, then, is capable of change, but their discipline is better.

63. Every creature, then, is subject to change, not only such as has been changed by some sin or condition of the outward elements, but also such as can be liable to corruption by a fault of nature, though by careful discipline it be not yet so; for, as we have shown in a former treatise, the nature of Angels evidently can be changed. It is certainly fitting to judge that such as is the nature of one, such also is that of others. The nature of the rest, then, is capable of change, but the discipline is better.

Every creature, therefore, is capable of change, but the Holy Spirit is good and not capable of change, nor can He be changed by any fault, since He removes the faults of all and pardons their sins. How, then, could He be capable of change, when He brings about in others a change to grace through sanctification, yet is not Himself changed?

64. Every creature, therefore, is capable of change, but the Holy Spirit is good and not capable of change, nor can He be changed by any fault, Who does away the faults of all and pardons their sins. How, then, is He capable of change, Who by sanctifying works in others a change to grace, but is not changed Himself.

How is He capable of change Who is always good? For the Holy Spirit, through Whom good things are given to us, is never evil. Two evangelists in one and the same place have made the same statement, though in different words. You read in Matthew: "If you, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more shall your Father, Who is in heaven, give good things to them that ask Him." But according to Luke you will find it written: "How much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask Him?" We observe, then, that the Holy Spirit is good in the Lord's judgment by the testimony of the evangelists, since one has put "good things" in place of the Holy Spirit, and the other has named the Holy Spirit in place of "good things." If, then, the Holy Spirit is that which is good, how is He not good?

65. How is He capable of change Who is always good? For the Holy Spirit, through Whom the things that are good are ministered to us, is never evil. Whence two evangelists in one and the same place, in words in differing from each other, have made the same statement, for you read in Matthew: If you, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children; how much more shall your Father, Who is in heaven, give good things to them that ask Him. Matthew 7:11 But according to Luke you will find it thus written: How much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask Him? Luke 11:13 We observe, then, that the Holy Spirit is good in the Lord's judgment by the testimony of the evangelists, since the one has put good things in the place of the Holy Spirit, the other has named the Holy Spirit in the place of good things. If, then, the Holy Spirit is that which is good, how is He not good?

We should also note that some manuscripts similarly record, according to Luke: How much more shall your heavenly Father give a good gift to those who ask Him. This good gift is the grace of the Spirit, which the Lord Jesus poured out from heaven after being fastened to the cross and returning with the triumphant spoils of death, now stripped of its power, as you find it written: Ascending up on high He led captivity captive, and gave good gifts to men. And he rightly says gifts, for just as the Son was given, of Whom it is written: Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given, so too is the grace of the Spirit given. But why should I hesitate to say that the Holy Spirit is also given to us, since it is written: The love of God is shed forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, Who is given to us. And since captive hearts certainly could not receive Him, the Lord Jesus first led captivity captive, so that with our affections set free, He might pour forth the gift of divine grace.

66. Nor does it escape our notice that some copies have likewise, according to St. Luke: How much more shall your heavenly Father give a good gift to them that ask Him. This good gift is the grace of the Spirit, which the Lord Jesus shed forth from heaven, after having been fixed to the gibbet of the cross, returning with the triumphal spoils of death deprived of its power, as you find it written: Ascending up on high He led captivity captive, and gave good gifts to men. And well does he say gifts, for as the Son was given, of Whom it is written: Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given; Isaiah 9:6 so, too, is the grace of the Spirit given. But why should I hesitate to say that the Holy Spirit also is given to us, since it is written: The love of God is shed forth in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, Who is given to us. Romans 5:5 And since captive breasts certainly could not receive Him, the Lord Jesus first led captivity captive, that our affections being set free, He might pour forth the gift of divine grace.

He was right to say that he led captivity captive. Christ's victory is the victory of freedom, which won grace for everyone and wronged no one. In the liberation of all, no one remains captive. And because at the time of the Lord's passion, wrong alone had no part—that wrong which had made captive all those it had seized—captivity itself, turning back on itself, was made captive. It is no longer attached to Belial but to Christ, and to serve Him is liberty. For whoever is called in the Lord as a servant is the Lord's freedman.

67. And He said well led captivity captive. For the victory of Christ is the victory of liberty, which won grace for all, and inflicted wrong on none. So in the setting free of all no one is captive. And because in the time of the Lord's passion wrong alone had no part, which had made captive all of whom it had gained possession, captivity itself turning back upon itself was made captive, not now attached to Belial but to Christ, to serve Whom is liberty. For he who is called in the Lord as a servant is the Lord's freedman. 1 Corinthians 7:22

But to return to the point. All, He says, have gone aside, all together have become unprofitable. There is none that does good, not even one. If they make an exception for the Holy Spirit, then even they themselves confess that He is not included among all. If they do not make an exception for Him, then they too acknowledge that He has gone aside along with all the rest.

68. But to return to the point. All, says He, have gone aside, all together have become unprofitable. There is none that does good, not even one. If they except the Holy Spirit, even they themselves confess that He is not among all; if they do not except Him, then they, too, acknowledge that He has gone aside among all.

69. But let us consider whether He has goodness in Himself, since He is the Source and Principle of goodness. For just as the Father and the Son have goodness, so too does the Holy Spirit. The Apostle also taught this when he said: Now the fruit of the Spirit is peace, love, joy, patience, goodness. For who can doubt that He is good whose fruit is goodness? After all, a good tree brings forth good fruit.

69. But let us consider whether He has goodness in Himself, since He is the Source and Principle of goodness. For as the Father and the Son have, so too the Holy Spirit also has goodness. And the Apostle also taught this when he said: Now the fruit of the Spirit is peace, love, joy, patience, goodness. Galatians 5:22 For who doubts that He is good Whose fruit is goodness. For a good tree brings forth good fruit. Matthew 7:17

If God is good, then how can the Spirit who proceeds from His mouth not be good—He who searches even the deep things of God? Can the infection of evil enter into the deep things of God? From this it becomes clear how foolish are those who deny that the Son of God is good, when they cannot deny that the Spirit of Christ is good, of whom the Son of God says: "Therefore I said that He shall receive of Mine."

70. And so if God be good, how shall He Who is the Spirit of His mouth not be good, Who searches even the deep things of God? Can the infection of evil enter into the deep things of God? And from this it is seen how foolish they are who deny that the Son of God is good, when they cannot deny that the Spirit of Christ is good, of Whom the Son of God says: Therefore said I that He shall receive of Mine. John 16:15

The Spirit makes good men out of the worst people, removes sin, destroys evil, excludes crime, pours out good gifts, turns persecutors into apostles, and makes priests out of sinners—is He not good? As it is written: "You were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord."

71. Or is the Spirit not good, Who of the worst makes good men, does away sin, destroys evil, shuts out crime, pours in good gifts, makes apostles of persecutors, and priests of sinners? You were, it is said, sometime darkness, but now are you light in the Lord. Ephesians 5:8

But why do we delay? If they ask for statements since they do not deny the facts, let them hear that the Holy Spirit is good, for David said: Let Your good Spirit lead me forth in the right way. For what is the Spirit but full of goodness? Who, though because of His physis (nature) He cannot be grasped, yet because of His goodness can be received by us, filling all things with His power, but shared only by the just, simple in substance, rich in virtues, present to each, distributing of His own to every one, and Himself whole everywhere.

72. But why do we put them off? And if they ask for statements since they do not deny facts, let them hear that the Holy Spirit is good, for David said: Let Your good Spirit lead me forth in the right way. For what is the Spirit but full of goodness? Who though because of His nature He cannot be attained to, yet because of His goodness can be received by us, filling all things His power, but only partaken of by the just, simple in substance, rich in virtues, present to each, dividing of His own to every one, and Himself whole everywhere.

The Son of God rightly said: Go and baptize all nations in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. He did not reject association with the Holy Spirit. Why then do some people object to joining in our devotion the One whom the Lord did not reject in the sacrament of baptism, together with the Father and the Son?

73. And with good cause did the Son of God say: Go and baptize all nations in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, Matthew 28:19 not disdaining association with the Holy Spirit. Why, then, do some take it ill that He Whom the Lord disdained not in the sacrament of baptism, should be joined in our devotion with the Father and the Son?

Good, then, is the Spirit, but good not as one who acquires goodness but as one who imparts it. For the Holy Spirit does not receive from creatures but is received. Likewise, He is not sanctified but sanctifies, for the creature is sanctified, but the Holy Spirit sanctifies. In this matter, though the word is used in common, there is a difference in nature. For both the man who receives holiness and God who gives holiness are called holy, as we read: Be holy, for I am holy. Now sanctification and corruption cannot share the same nature, and therefore the grace of the Holy Spirit and the creature cannot be of one substance.

74. Good, then, is the Spirit, but good, not as though acquiring but as imparting goodness. For the Holy Spirit does not receive from creatures but is received; as also He is not sanctified but sanctifies; for the creature is sanctified, but the Holy Spirit sanctifies. In which matter, though the word is used in common, there is a difference in the nature. For both the man who receives and God Who gives sanctity are called holy, as we read: Be holy, for I am holy. Leviticus 19:2 Now sanctification and corruption cannot share the same nature, and therefore the grace of the Holy Spirit and the creature cannot be of one substance.

Since the whole invisible creation (whose substance some rightly believe to be reasonable and incorporeal), except for the Trinity, does not give but receives the grace of the Spirit, and does not share in it but receives it, the entire body of creation must be separated from association with the Holy Spirit. Let them therefore believe that the Holy Spirit is not a creature. Or, if they consider Him a creature, why do they associate Him with the Father? If they think He is a creature, why do they join Him with the Son of God? But if they do not think He should be separated from the Father and the Son, they do not consider Him to be a creature, for where the sanctification is one, the nature (physis) is one.

75. Since, then, the whole invisible creation (whose substance some rightly believe to be reasonable and incorporeal), with the exception of the Trinity, does not impart but acquires the grace of the Spirit, and does not share in it but receives it, the whole commonalty of creation is to be separated from association with the Holy Spirit. Let them then believe that the Holy Spirit is not a creature; or, if they think Him a creature, why do they associate Him with the Father? If they think Him a creature, why do they join Him with the Son of God? But if they do not think that He should be separated from the Father and the Son, they do not consider Him to be a creature, for where the sanctification is one the nature is one.

Chapter 6.

Although we are baptized with water and the Spirit, the latter is much superior to the former, and should not therefore be separated from the Father and the Son.

Although we are baptized with water and the Spirit, the latter is much superior to the former, and is not therefore to be separated from the Father and the Son.

There are many people who, because we are baptized with water and the Spirit, think there is no difference in the functions of water and the Spirit, and therefore conclude they do not differ in nature. They fail to observe that we are buried in the element of water so that we may rise again renewed by the Spirit. For in the water there is a representation of death, while in the Spirit there is the pledge of life, so that the body of sin may die through the water, which encloses the body like a kind of tomb, so that we, by the power of the Spirit, may be renewed from the death of sin, being born again in God.

76. There are, however, many who, because we are baptized with water and the Spirit, think that there is no difference in the offices of water and the Spirit, and therefore think that they do not differ in nature. Nor do they observe that we are buried in the element of water that we may rise again renewed by the Spirit. For in the water is the representation of death, in the Spirit is the pledge of life, that the body of sin may die through the water, which encloses the body as it were in a kind of tomb, that we, by the power of the Spirit, may be renewed from the death of sin, being born again in God.

And so these three witnesses are one, as John said: The water, the blood, and the Spirit. One in the mystery, not in nature. The water, then, is a witness of burial, the blood is a witness of death, the Spirit is a witness of life. If, then, there is any grace in the water, it is not from the nature of water, but from the presence of the Holy Spirit.

77. And so these three witnesses are one, as John said: The water, the blood, and the Spirit. 1 John 5:8 One in the mystery, not in nature. The water, then, is a witness of burial, the blood is a witness of death, the Spirit is a witness of life. If, then, there be any grace in the water, it is not from the nature of water, but from the presence of the Holy Spirit.

Do we live in the water or in the Spirit? Are we sealed in the water or in the Spirit? For in Him we live, and He Himself is the pledge of our inheritance, as the Apostle says, writing to the Ephesians: In Whom believing you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, Who is an earnest of our inheritance. So we were sealed by the Holy Spirit, not by nature, but by God, for it is written: He Who anointed us is God, Who also sealed us, and gave the pledge of the Spirit in our hearts.

78. Do we live in the water or in the Spirit? Are we sealed in the water or in the Spirit. For in Him we live and He Himself is the earnest of our inheritance, as the Apostle says, writing to the Ephesians: In Whom believing you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, Who is an earnest of our inheritance. Ephesians 1:13-14 So we were sealed by the Holy Spirit, not by nature, but by God, for it is written: He Who anointed us is God, Who also sealed us, and gave the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.

We were sealed with the Spirit by God. Just as we die in Christ in order to be born again, we are also sealed with the Spirit so that we may possess His brightness, image, and grace, which is undoubtedly our spiritual seal. For although we were visibly sealed in our bodies, we are in reality sealed in our hearts, so that the Holy Spirit may portray in us the likeness of the heavenly image.

79. We were then sealed with the Spirit by God. For as we die in Christ, in order to be born again, so, too, we are sealed with the Spirit, that we may possess His brightness and image and grace, which is undoubtedly our spiritual seal. For although we were visibly sealed in our bodies, we are in truth sealed in our hearts, that the Holy Spirit may portray in us the likeness of the heavenly image.

80. Who, then, can dare to say that the Holy Spirit is separated from the Father and the Son, since through Him we attain to the image and likeness of God, and through Him, as the Apostle Peter says, we become partakers of the divine nature? In this there is certainly not an inheritance based on physical descent, but rather the spiritual connection that comes from the grace of adoption. And so that we may know that this seal is on our hearts rather than on our bodies, the prophet says: The light of Your countenance has been impressed upon us, O Lord, You have put gladness in my heart.

80. Who, then, can dare to say that the Holy Spirit is separated from the Father and the Son, since through Him we attain to the image and likeness of God, and through Him, as the Apostle Peter says, are partakers of the divine nature? In which there is certainly not the inheritance of carnal succession, but the spiritual connection of the grace of adoption. And in order that we may know that this seal is rather on our hearts than on our bodies, the prophet says: The light of Your countenance has been impressed upon us, O Lord, You have put gladness in my heart.

Chapter 7.

The Holy Spirit is not a creature, since He is infinite and was poured out upon the apostles who were scattered throughout all regions. He also sanctifies the Angels, to whom He makes us equal. Mary was likewise full of the same Spirit, as was Christ the Lord, and indeed all things both high and low. All blessing has its origin from His working, as was signified in the stirring of the water at Bethesda.

The Holy Spirit is not a creature, seeing that He is infinite, and was shed upon the apostles dispersed through all countries, and moreover sanctifies the Angels also, to whom He makes us equal. Mary was full of the same likewise, so too, Christ the Lord, and so far all things high and low. And all benediction has its origin from His operation, as was signified in the moving of the water at Bethesda.

Since every creature is confined within certain limits of its own nature, and since those invisible operations that cannot be circumscribed by place and boundaries are nevertheless enclosed by the property of their own substance, how can anyone dare to call the Holy Spirit a creature when He does not have a limited and circumscribed power? He is always in all things and everywhere, which is certainly the property of divinity and lordship, for the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof.

81. Since then, every creature is confined within certain limits of its own nature, and inasmuch as those invisible operations, which cannot be circumscribed by place and bounds, yet are closed in by the property of their own substance; how can any one dare to call the Holy Spirit a creature, Who has not a limited and circumscribed power? Because He is always in all things and everywhere, which assuredly is the property of Divinity and Lordship, for: The earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof.

When the Lord appointed His servants the apostles, He assigned them to different places so that we might recognize that the creature was one thing and the grace of the Spirit another, since all of them could not be everywhere at once. But He gave the Holy Spirit to all of them, pouring out the gift of indivisible grace upon the apostles even though they were separated from one another. The persons were different, but the accomplishment of the work was one in all of them, because the Holy Spirit is one. It is of Him that it is said: "You shall receive power, even the Holy Spirit coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and unto the ends of the earth."

81. And so, when the Lord appointed His servants the apostles, that we might recognize that the creature was one thing and the grace of the Spirit another, He appointed them to different places, because all could not be everywhere at once. But He gave the Holy Spirit to all, to shed upon the apostles though separated the gift of indivisible grace. The persons, then, were different, but the accomplishment of the working was in all one, because the Holy Spirit is one of Whom it is said: You shall receive power, even the Holy Spirit coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and unto the ends of the earth. Acts 1:8

The Holy Spirit, then, is uncircumscribed and infinite. He poured Himself into the minds of the disciples throughout the separate regions of distant lands and the remote boundaries of the whole world. Nothing can escape Him or deceive Him. This is why holy David says: "Where shall I go from Your Spirit, or where shall I flee from Your face?" Does Scripture say this about any Angel? About any Dominion? About any Power? Where do we find the power of any Angel spread over many people? Angels were sent to a few individuals, but the Holy Spirit was poured out upon entire peoples. Who, then, can doubt that what is poured out upon many at once and cannot be seen is divine, while what is seen and held by individuals is corporeal?

82. The Holy Spirit, then, is uncircumscribed and infinite, Who infused Himself into the minds of the disciples throughout the separate divisions of distant regions, and the remote bounds of the whole world, Whom nothing is able to escape or to deceive. And therefore holy David says: Whither shall I go from Your Spirit, or whither shall I flee from Your face. Of what Angel does the Scripture say this? Of what Dominion? Of what Power? Of what Angel do we find the power diffused over many? For Angels were sent to few, but the Holy Spirit was poured upon whole peoples. Who, then, can doubt that that is divine which is shed upon many at once and is not seen; but that that is corporeal which is seen and held by individuals?

But just as the Spirit who sanctifies the apostles is not a partaker of human nature, so too the Spirit who sanctifies Angels, Dominions, and Powers has no partnership with creatures. However, if anyone thinks that the holiness of the Angels is not spiritual but some other kind of grace belonging to the property of their nature, they will indeed judge Angels to be inferior to men. For since they themselves also confess that they would not dare to compare Angels to the Holy Spirit, and they cannot deny that the Holy Spirit is poured out upon men, and since the sanctification of the Spirit is a divine gift and favor, men who possess a better kind of sanctification will certainly be found to be preferred to the Angels. But since Angels come down to men to help them, it must be understood that the nature of Angels is higher because it receives more of the grace of the Spirit, and that the favor given to us and to them comes from the same author.

83. But in like manner as the Spirit sanctifying the apostles is not a partaker of human nature; so, too, He sanctifying Angels, Dominions, and Powers, has no partnership with creatures. But if any think that the holiness of the Angels is not spiritual, but some other kind of grace belonging to the property of their nature, they will forsooth judge Angels to be inferior to men. For since themselves also confess that they would not dare to compare Angels to the Holy Spirit, and they cannot deny that the Holy Spirit is shed upon men; but the sanctification of the Spirit is a divine gift and favour, men who possess a better kind of sanctification will certainly be found to be preferred to the Angels. But since Angels come down to men to assist them, it must be understood that the nature of Angels is higher as it receives more of the grace of the Spirit, and that the favour awarded to us and to them comes from the same author.

However great is that grace which makes even the lower nature of humanity equal to the gifts received by Angels, just as the Lord Himself promised, saying: You shall be as the Angels in heaven. Nor is this difficult, for He Who made those Angels in the Spirit will by the same grace make human beings also equal to the Angels.

84. But how great is that grace which makes even the lower nature of the lot of men equal to the gifts received by Angels, as the Lord Himself promised, saying: You shall be as the Angels in heaven. Nor is it difficult, for He Who made those Angels in the Spirit will by the same grace make men also equal to the Angels.

85. But of what creature can it be said that it fills all things, as is written of the Holy Spirit: I will pour My Spirit upon all flesh. This cannot be said of an Angel. Finally, Gabriel himself, when sent to Mary, said: Hail, full of grace, plainly declaring the grace of the Spirit which was in her, because the Holy Spirit had come upon her, and she was about to have her womb full of grace with the heavenly Word.

85. But of what creature can it be said that it fills all things, as is written of the Holy Spirit: I will pour My Spirit upon all flesh. Joel 2:28 This cannot be said of an Angel. Lastly, Gabriel himself, when sent to Mary, said: Hail, full of grace, Luke 1:28 plainly declaring the grace of the Spirit which was in her, because the Holy Spirit had come upon her, and she was about to have her womb full of grace with the heavenly Word.

It belongs to the Lord to fill all things, as He says: I fill heaven and earth. If the Lord is the one who fills heaven and earth, who can judge the Holy Spirit to lack a share in lordship and divine power, since He has filled the world and what is beyond the entire world—having filled Jesus the Redeemer of the whole world? For it is written: But Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, departed from Jordan. Who, then, except one who possessed the same fullness could fill Him who fills all things?

86. For it is of the Lord to fill all things, Who says: I fill heaven and earth. Jeremiah 23:24 If, then, it is the Lord Who fills heaven and earth, Who can judge the Holy Spirit to be without a share in the dominion and divine power, seeing that He has filled the world, and what is beyond the whole world, filled Jesus the Redeemer of the whole world? For it is written: But Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, departed from Jordan. Luke 4:1 Who, then, except one who possessed the same fullness could fill Him Who fills all things?

87. But in case they object that this was said according to the flesh—though He alone, from Whose flesh power went out to heal everyone, was greater than all—still, just as the Lord fills all things, so we also read of the Spirit: "For the Spirit of the Lord filled the whole world." And you find it said of all who had associated with the Apostles that, "filled with the Holy Spirit they spoke the word of God with boldness." You see that the Spirit gives both fullness and boldness, Whose working the archangel announces to Mary, saying: "The Holy Spirit shall come upon you."

87. But lest they should object that this was said according to the flesh, though He alone from Whose flesh went forth virtue to heal all, was more than all; yet, as the Lord fills all things, so, too, we read of the Spirit: For the Spirit of the Lord filled the whole world. Wisdom 1:7 And you find it said of all who had consorted with the Apostles that, filled with the Holy Spirit they spoke the word of God with boldness. Acts 4:31 You see that the Spirit gives both fullness and boldness, Whose operation the archangel announces to Mary, saying: The Holy Spirit shall come on you. Luke 1:35

You also read in the Gospel that the Angel descended at the appointed time into the pool and stirred up the water, and whoever went down into the pool first was healed. What did the Angel announce in this symbolic action except the descent of the Holy Spirit, which was to happen in our own time and would consecrate the waters when called upon by the prayers of the priest? That Angel, then, was a messenger of the Holy Spirit, since through the grace of the Spirit, healing was to be applied to our weaknesses of soul and mind. The Spirit, therefore, has the same servants as God the Father and Christ. He fills all things, possesses all things, works all things and in all things in the same way that God the Father and the Son work.

88. You read, too, in the Gospel that the Angel descended at the appointed time into the pool and troubled the water, and he who first went down into the pool was made whole. John 5:4 What did the Angel declare in this type but the descent of the Holy Spirit, which was to come to pass in our day, and should consecrate the waters when invoked by the prayers of the priest? That Angel, then, was a herald of the Holy Spirit, inasmuch as by means of the grace of the Spirit medicine was to be applied to our infirmities of soul and mind. The Spirit, then, has the same ministers as God the Father and Christ. He fills all things, possesses all things, works all and in all in the same manner as God the Father and the Son work.

What, then, is more divine than the working of the Holy Spirit, since God Himself testifies that the Holy Spirit presides over His blessings, saying: "I will put My Spirit upon your seed and My blessings upon your children." For no blessing can be complete except through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, the Apostle found nothing better to wish for us than this, as he himself said: "We cease not to pray and make request for you that you may be filled with the knowledge of His will, in all wisdom and spiritual understanding walking worthily of God." He taught, then, that this was the will of God—that by walking in good works and words and affections, we should be filled with the will of God, Who puts His Holy Spirit in our hearts. Therefore, if the person who has the Holy Spirit is filled with the will of God, there is certainly no difference of will between the Father and the Son.

89. What, then, is more divine than the working of the Holy Spirit, since God Himself testifies that the Holy Spirit presides over His blessings, saying: I will put My Spirit upon your seed and My blessings upon your children. Isaiah 44:3 For no blessing can be full except through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Wherefore, too, the Apostle found nothing better to wish us than this, as He himself said: We cease not to pray and make request for you that you may be filled with the knowledge of His will, in all wisdom and spiritual understanding walking worthily of God. Colossians 1:9 He taught, then, that this was the will of God, that rather by walking in good works and words and affections, we should be filled with the will of God, Who puts His Holy Spirit in our hearts. Therefore if he who has the Holy Spirit is filled with the will of God, there is certainly no difference of will between the Father and the Son.

Chapter 8.

God alone gives the Holy Spirit, yet not entirely to each person, since no one except Christ is capable of receiving Him entirely. Charity is poured out by the Holy Spirit, who, prefigured by the mystical ointment, is shown to have nothing in common with creatures. And since He is said to proceed from the mouth of God, He must not be classified with creatures or with things that can be divided, seeing that He is eternal.

The Holy Spirit is given by God alone, yet not wholly to each person, since there is no one besides Christ capable of receiving Him wholly. Charity is shed abroad by the Holy Spirit, Who, prefigured by the mystical ointment, is shown to have nothing common with creatures; and He, inasmuch as He is said to proceed from the mouth of God, must not be classed with creatures, nor with things divisible, seeing He is eternal.

Notice at the same time that God gives the Holy Spirit. This is not something accomplished by human effort or given as a human gift. Rather, the one who is called upon by the priest is given by God—here we see God's gift and the priest's ministry working together. If the Apostle Paul judged that he was unable to give the Holy Spirit by his own authority, and considered himself so inadequate for this task that he wanted us to be filled by God with the Spirit (Ephesians 5:18), who is capable of daring to claim for himself the right to confer this gift? So the Apostle expressed this desire in prayer and did not claim any right by his own authority. He wanted to receive it, not presume to command it. Peter also says that he is not able to compel or restrain the Holy Spirit. For he spoke in this way: "Therefore if God has granted them the same grace as to us, who was I that I could resist God?" (Acts 11:17)

90. Observe at the same time that God gives the Holy Spirit. For this is no work of man, nor gift of man; but He Who is invoked by the priest is given by God, wherein is the gift of God and the ministry of the priest. For if the Apostle Paul judged that he was not able to give the Holy Spirit himself by his own authority, and considered himself so far unequal to this office that he wished us to be filled by God with the Spirit, Ephesians 5:18 who is sufficient to dare to arrogate to himself the conferring of this gift? So the Apostle uttered this wish in prayer, and did not claim a right by any authority of his own; he desired to obtain, he did not presume to command. Peter, too, says that he is not capable of compelling or restraining the Holy Spirit. For he spoke thus: Wherefore if God has granted them the same grace as to us, who was I that I could resist God? Acts 11:17

But perhaps they would not be moved by the example of the apostles, so let us use divine statements instead. For it is written: "Jacob is My servant, I will uphold him; Israel is My elect, My soul has upheld him, I put My Spirit upon him." The Lord also said through Isaiah: "The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me."

91. But perchance they would not be moved by the example of apostles, and so let us use divine utterances; for it is written: Jacob is My servant, I will uphold him; Israel is My elect, My soul has upheld him, I put My Spirit upon him. Isaiah 42:1 The Lord also said by Isaiah: The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me. Isaiah 61:1

92. Who, then, can dare to say that the substance of the Holy Spirit is created, when by His shining in our hearts we see the beauty of divine truth and the distance between the creature and the Godhead, so that the work may be distinguished from its Author? Or of what creature has God spoken in such a way as to say: I will pour out of My Spirit? He did not say Spirit, but of My Spirit, because we are not able to receive the fullness of the Holy Spirit, but we receive as much as our Master distributes to us of His own according to His will. For just as the Son of God did not consider it robbery that He should be equal to God, but emptied Himself so that we might be able to receive Him in our minds—yet He emptied Himself not because He was void of His own fullness, but so that He, whose fullness I could not endure, might pour Himself into me according to the measure of my capacity—in the same way the Father says that He pours out of the Spirit upon all flesh. For He did not pour Him forth wholly, but what He poured forth was abundant for all.

92. Who, then, can dare to say that the substance of the Holy Spirit is created, at Whose shining in our hearts we behold the beauty of divine truth, and the distance between the creature and the Godhead, that the work may be distinguished from its Author? Or of what creature has God so spoken as to say: I will pour out of My Spirit? Joel 2:28 He said not Spirit, but of My Spirit, for we are not able to receive the fullness of the Holy Spirit, but we receive as much as our Master divides to us of His own according to His will. Philippians 2:6 For as the Son of God thought it not robbery that He should be equal to God, but emptied Himself, that we might be able to receive Him in our minds; but He emptied Himself not that He was void of His own fullness, but in order that He, Whose fullness I could not endure, might infuse Himself into me according to the measure of my capacity, in like manner also the Father says that He pours out of the Spirit upon all flesh; for He did not pour Him forth wholly, but that which He poured forth abounded for all.

The Spirit was poured out upon us, but when the Lord Jesus was in the form of man, the Spirit remained on him, as it is written: "Upon whom you shall see the Spirit descending from heaven and remaining upon him, he it is who baptizes in the Holy Spirit." We experience the generous provision of the Giver in abundance, but in him the fullness of the Spirit remains forever. He poured out what he considered sufficient for us, and what was poured out is not separated or divided. Rather, he possesses a unity of fullness by which he enlightens the sight of our hearts according to what our strength can handle. Finally, we receive as much as the progress of our mind acquires, for the fullness of the Spirit's grace is indivisible, but we share in it according to the capacity of our own nature.

93. There was therefore a pouring out upon us of the Spirit, but upon the Lord Jesus, when He was in the form of man, the Spirit abode, as it is written: Upon Whom you shall see the Spirit descending from heaven, and abiding upon Him, He it is Who baptizes in the Holy Spirit. John 1:33 Around us is the liberality of the Giver in abundant provision, in Him abides for ever the fullness of the Spirit. He shed forth then what He deemed to be sufficient for us, and what was shed forth is not separated nor divided; but He has a unity of fullness wherewith He may enlighten the sight of our hearts according to what our strength is capable of. Lastly, we receive so much as the advancing of our mind acquires, for the fullness of the grace of the Spirit is indivisible, but is shared in by us according to the capacity of our own nature.

God sheds forth the Spirit, and the love of God is also shed abroad through the Spirit. In this we ought to recognize the unity of operation and grace. For just as God sheds forth the Holy Spirit, so also the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts through the Holy Spirit. This shows that the Holy Spirit is not a created work, since He is the dispenser and abundant source of divine love.

94. God, then, sheds forth of the Spirit, and the love of God is also shed abroad through the Spirit; in which point we ought to recognize the unity of the operation and of the grace. For as God shed forth of the Holy Spirit, so also the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts through the Holy Spirit; Romans 5:5 in order that we may understand that the Holy Spirit is not a work, Who is the dispenser and plenteous Fount of the divine love.

In the same way, so that you may believe that what is shed abroad cannot be common to created beings but belongs uniquely to the Godhead, the name of the Son is also poured forth, as you read: Your Name is as ointment poured forth. Nothing can surpass the power of this statement. For just as ointment sealed in a container keeps its fragrance as long as it remains confined in the narrow space of that container—though it cannot reach many people, it still preserves its strength—but when the ointment has been poured out of the container in which it was enclosed, it spreads far and wide, so too the Name of Christ before His coming among the people of Israel was enclosed in the minds of the Jews as in a container. For God is known in Judah, His Name is great in Israel—that is, the Name which the containers of the Jews held confined within their narrow limits.

95. In like manner that you may believe that that which is shed abroad cannot be common to the creatures but peculiar to the Godhead, the name of the Son is also poured forth, as you read: Your Name is as ointment poured forth. Song of Songs 1:3 Of which saying nothing can surpass the force. For as ointment closed up in a vase keeps in its perfume, so long as it is confined in the narrow space of that vase, though it cannot reach many, it yet preserves its strength. But when the ointment has been poured out of that vase wherein it was enclosed, it spreads far and wide; so, too, the Name of Christ before His coming among the people of Israel was enclosed in the minds of the Jews as in some vase. For God is known in Judah, His Name is great in Israel; that is, the Name which the vases of the Jews held confined in their narrow limits.

Even then that Name was indeed great when it remained within the narrow limits of the weak and few, but it had not yet poured forth its greatness throughout the hearts of the Gentiles and to the ends of the whole world. But after He had shone throughout the whole world by His coming, He spread abroad that divine Name of His throughout all creatures—not filled up by any addition (for fullness does not allow for increase), but filling up the empty spaces, so that His Name might be wonderful in all the world. The pouring forth of His Name, then, signifies a kind of abundant overflowing of graces and richness of heavenly goods, for whatever is poured forth flows over from abundance.

96. Even then that Name was indeed great, when it remained in the narrow limits of the weak and few, but it had not yet poured forth its greatness throughout the hearts of the Gentiles, and to the ends of the whole world. But after that He by His coming had shone throughout the whole world, He spread abroad that divine Name of His throughout all creatures, not filled up by any addition (for fullness admits not of increase), but filling up the empty spaces, that His Name might be wonderful in all the world. The pouring forth, then, of His Name signifies a kind of abundant exuberance of graces and copiousness of heavenly goods, for whatever is poured forth flows over from abundance.

Since wisdom that proceeds from the mouth of God cannot be said to be created, nor the Word that is uttered from His heart, nor the power in which the fullness of the eternal Majesty exists, so too the Spirit that is poured forth from the mouth of God cannot be considered to be created. God Himself has shown that their unity is such that He speaks of His pouring forth of His Spirit. By this we understand that the grace of God the Father is the same as that of the Holy Spirit, and that it is divided to the hearts of each person without any separation or loss. Therefore, what is shed abroad of the Holy Spirit is neither severed, nor contained in any bodily parts, nor divided.

97. So as wisdom which proceeds from the mouth of God cannot be said to be created, nor the Word Which is uttered from His heart, nor the power in which is the fullness of the eternal Majesty; so, too, the Spirit which is poured forth from the mouth of God cannot be considered to be created, since God Himself has shown their unity to be such that He speaks of His pouring forth of His Spirit. By which we understand that the grace of God the Father is the same as that of the Holy Spirit, and that without any division or loss it is divided to the hearts of each. That, then, which is shed abroad of the Holy Spirit is neither severed, nor comprehended in any corporeal parts, nor divided.

For how can it be believable that the Spirit should be divided up by any parceling out? John says of God: "By this we know that He abides in us by the Spirit which He has given us." But what abides always is certainly not changed, so if it suffers no change it is eternal. And so the Holy Spirit is eternal, but the creature is liable to fault and therefore subject to change. But what is subject to change cannot be eternal, and there cannot therefore be anything in common between the Spirit and the creature, because the Spirit is eternal, but every creature is temporal.

98. For how can it be credible that the Spirit should be divided by any parcelling out? John says of God: Hereby know we that He abides in us by the Spirit which He has given us. 1 John 3:24 But that which abides always is certainly not changed, therefore if it suffers no change it is eternal. And so the Holy Spirit is eternal, but the creature is liable to fault, and therefore subject to change. But that which is subject to change cannot be eternal, and there cannot therefore be anything in common between the Spirit and the creature, because the Spirit is eternal, but every creature is temporal.

The Apostle also demonstrates that the Holy Spirit is eternal, for he writes: If the blood of bulls and goats and the sprinkling of the ashes of a heifer sanctifies for the purifying of the flesh, how much more does the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God? Therefore the Spirit is eternal.

99. But the Apostle also shows that the Holy Spirit is eternal, for: If the blood of bulls and of goats, and the sprinkling the ashes of an heifer sanctifies to the purifying of the flesh, how much more the blood of Christ, Who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God? Hebrews 9:13-14 Therefore the Spirit is eternal.

Chapter 9.

The Holy Spirit is rightly called the ointment of Christ and the oil of gladness, and we need to understand why Christ Himself is not the ointment, since He was anointed with the Holy Spirit. It should not surprise us that the Spirit is called Ointment, since the Father and the Son are also called Spirit. There is no confusion between them, because Christ alone suffered death, and it is His saving cross that is then being spoken of.

The Holy Spirit is rightly called the ointment of Christ, and the oil of gladness; and why Christ Himself is not the ointment, since He was anointed with the Holy Spirit. It is not strange that the Spirit should be called Ointment, since the Father and the Son are also called Spirit. And there is no confusion between them, since Christ alone suffered death, Whose saving cross is then spoken of.

100. Now many have thought that the Holy Spirit is the ointment of Christ. And it is rightly called ointment, because He is called the oil of gladness, since the joining together of many graces gives a sweet fragrance. But God the Almighty Father anointed Him as the Prince of priests, Who was not like others anointed in a symbolic type under the Law, but was both anointed in the body according to the Law, and in truth was filled with the power of the Holy Spirit from the Father beyond the Law.

100. Now many have thought that the Holy Spirit is the ointment of Christ. And well it is said ointment, because He is called the oil of gladness, the joining together of many graces giving a sweet fragrance. But God the Almighty Father anointed Him the Prince of priests, Who was, not like others anointed in a type under the Law, but was both according to the Law anointed in the body, and in truth was full with the virtue of the Holy Spirit from the Father above the Law.

This is the oil of gladness, about which the prophet says: God, even Your God, has anointed You with the oil of gladness above Your fellows. Furthermore, Peter says that Jesus was anointed with the Spirit, as you read: You know that word which went through all Judea beginning from Galilee after the baptism which John preached, even Jesus of Nazareth, how God anointed Him with the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is, therefore, the oil of gladness.

101. This is the oil of gladness, of which the prophet says: God, even Your God, has anointed You with the oil of gladness above Your fellows. Lastly, Peter says that Jesus was anointed with the Spirit, as you read: You know that word which went through all Judea beginning from Galilee after the baptism which John preached, even Jesus of Nazareth, how God anointed Him with the Holy Spirit. Acts 10:37-38 The Holy Spirit is, then, the oil of gladness.

102. And he was right to say "oil of gladness," lest you think Him a creature. For the nature of this kind of oil is such that it absolutely will not mix with moisture of another type. Gladness also does not anoint the body but illuminates the innermost heart, as the prophet said: "You have put gladness in my heart." Just as someone wastes his efforts trying to mix oil with wetter substances—because since the nature of oil is lighter than other substances, when the others settle down, the oil rises and separates—how do these miserable peddlers think that the oil of gladness can be mixed with other creatures through their schemes, when truly corporeal things cannot be mixed with incorporeal things, nor created things with the uncreated?

102. And well did he say oil of gladness, lest you should think Him a creature; for it is the nature of this sort of oil that it will by no means mingle with moisture of another kind. Gladness, too, does not anoint the body, but brightens the inmost heart, as the prophet said: You have put gladness in my heart. So as he loses his pains who wishes to mix oil with moister matter, because since the nature of oil is lighter than others, when the others settle, it rises and is separated. How do those wretched pedlars think that the oil of gladness can by their tricks be mingled with other creatures, since of a truth corporeal things cannot be mingled with in corporeal, nor things created with uncreated?

And it is rightly called oil of gladness with which Christ was anointed, for no ordinary or common oil was to be sought for Him—the kind used to dress wounds or relieve heat. The salvation of the world did not seek relief for His wounds, nor did the eternal power of His wearied body require refreshment.

102. And well is that called oil of gladness wherewith Christ was anointed; for neither was usual nor common oil to be sought for Him, wherewith either wounds are dressed or heat assuaged; since the salvation of the world did not seek alleviation for His wounds, nor the eternal might of His wearied Body demand refreshment.

It is no surprise that Christ possesses the oil of gladness, since He made those who were about to die rejoice, removed sadness from the world, and destroyed the smell of sorrowful death. This is why the Apostle says: For we are the good odor of Christ to God, clearly showing that he is speaking about spiritual matters. But when the Son of God Himself says: The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me, He identifies the anointing of the Spirit. Therefore the Spirit is the anointing of Christ.

103. Nor is it wonderful if He have the oil of gladness, Who made those about to die rejoice, put off sadness from the world, destroyed the odour of sorrowful death. And so the Apostle says: For we are the good odour of Christ to God; 2 Corinthians 2:15 certainly showing that he is speaking of spiritual things. But when the Son of God Himself says: The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me, Luke 4:18 He points out the ointment of the Spirit. Therefore the Spirit is the ointment of Christ.

Since the Name of Jesus is like ointment poured out, if they wish to understand this as referring to Christ Himself rather than to the Spirit of Christ being expressed under the name of ointment, then certainly when the Apostle Peter says that the Lord Jesus was anointed with the Holy Spirit, it is without doubt clear that the Spirit also is called ointment.

104. Or since the Name of Jesus is as ointment poured out, if they wish to understand Christ Himself, and not the Spirit of Christ to be expressed under the name of ointment, certainly when the Apostle Peter says that the Lord Jesus was anointed with the Holy Spirit, it is without doubt plain that the Spirit also is called ointment.

105. But this should not surprise us, since both the Father and the Son are said to be Spirit. We will discuss this more fully when we begin to speak about the Unity of the Name. However, since a very appropriate place occurs here, and so that we may not seem to have moved on without reaching a conclusion, let them read that both the Father is called Spirit, as the Lord said in the Gospel, "for God is Spirit" (John 4:24), and Christ is called Spirit, for Jeremiah said, "The Spirit before our face, Christ the Lord" (Lamentations 4:20).

105. But what wonder, since both the Father and the Son are said to be Spirit. Of which we shall speak more fully when we begin to speak of the Unity of the Name. Yet since most suitable place occurs here, that we may not seem to have passed on without a conclusion, let them read that both the Father is called Spirit, as the Lord said in the Gospel, for God is Spirit; John 4:24 and Christ is called Spirit, for Jeremiah said: The Spirit before our face, Christ the Lord. Lamentations 4:20

So then, both the Father is Spirit and Christ is Spirit, because whatever is not a created body is spirit. However, the Holy Spirit is not mixed together with the Father and the Son, but is distinct from the Father and from the Son. For the Holy Spirit did not die, since He could not die because He had not taken on flesh, and the eternal Godhead was incapable of dying. But Christ died according to the flesh.

106. So, then, both the Father is Spirit and Christ is Spirit, for that which is not a created body is spirit, but the Holy Spirit is not commingled with the Father and the Son, but is distinct from the Father and from the Son. For the Holy Spirit did not die, Who could not die because He had not taken flesh upon Him, and the eternal Godhead was incapable of dying, but Christ died according to the flesh.

Christ truly died in what He received from the Virgin, not in what He possessed from the Father, for Christ died in that nature in which He was crucified. But the Holy Spirit could not be crucified, since He did not have flesh and bones. However, the Son of God was crucified because He took on flesh and bones, so that on the cross the temptations of our flesh might die. For He took upon Himself what He was not in order to conceal what He was. He concealed what He was so that He might be tempted in it, and what He was not might be redeemed, so that through what He was not He might call us to what He was.

107. For of a truth He died in that which He took of the Virgin, not in that which He had of the Father, for Christ died in that nature in which He was crucified. But the Holy Spirit could not be crucified, Who had not flesh and bones, but the Son of God was crucified, Who took flesh and bones, that on that cross the temptations of our flesh might die. For He took on Him that which He was not that He might hide that which He was; He hid that which He was that He might be tempted in it, and that which He was not might be redeemed, in order that He might call us by means of that which He was not to that which He was.

O the divine mystery of that cross, where weakness hangs, might is free, sins are nailed, and triumphant trophies are raised. So a certain saint said: "Pierce my flesh with nails for fear of You." He does not mean nails of iron, but of fear and faith. For the bonds of virtue are stronger than those of punishment. Finally, his faith bound Peter when he had followed the Lord as far as the high priest's hall, though no one had physically bound him, and punishment did not loose him whom faith had bound. Again, when he was bound by the Jews, prayer loosed him, and punishment did not hold him, because he had not turned back from Christ.

108. O the divine mystery of that cross, on which weakness hangs, might is free, vices are nailed, and triumphal trophies raised. So that a certain saint said: Pierce my flesh with nails for fear of You; he says not with nails of iron, but of fear and faith. For the bonds of virtue are stronger than those of punishment. Lastly, his faith bound Peter, when he had followed the Lord as far as the hall of the high priest, whom no one had bound, and punishment loosened not him, whom faith bound. Again, when he was bound by the Jews, prayer loosed him, punishment did not hold him, because he had not gone back from Christ.

Therefore, you too should crucify sin so that you may die to sin. Whoever dies to sin lives for God. Live for Him who did not spare His own Son, so that in His body He might crucify our passions. For Christ died for us so that we might live in His resurrected Body. Therefore, it was not our life but our guilt that died in Him, who, as Scripture says, bore our sins in His own body on the tree, so that being set free from our sins we might live in righteousness, and by the wound of whose stripes we are healed.

109. Therefore do you also crucify sin, that you may die to sin; he who dies to sin lives to God; do you live to Him Who spared not His own Son, that in His body He might crucify our passions. For Christ died for us, that we might live in His revived Body. Therefore not our life but our guilt died in Him, Who, it is said, bare our sins in His own Body on the tree; that being set free from our sins we might live in righteousness, by the wound of Whose stripes we are healed. 1 Peter 2:24

This wood of the cross is, then, like a kind of ship for our salvation—it is our passage, not a punishment, for there is no other salvation except the passage to eternal salvation. While I await death, I do not feel it; while I think little of punishment, I do not suffer it; while I am unconcerned with fear, I do not know it.

110. That wood of the cross is, then, as it were a kind of ship of our salvation, our passage, not a punishment, for there is no other salvation but the passage of eternal salvation. Whilst expecting death I do not feel it; while thinking little of punishment I do not suffer; while careless of fear I know it not.

Who, then, is He by the wound of whose stripes we are healed but Christ the Lord? Isaiah prophesied about Him that His stripes were our healing, and Paul the Apostle wrote in his epistle: "Who knew no sin, but was made sin for us." This, indeed, was divine in Him, that His Flesh did no sin, nor did the bodily creature take in sin in Him. For what wonder would it be if the Godhead alone sinned not, seeing that It had no incentives to sin? But if God alone is free from sin, certainly every creature by its own nature can be, as we have said, liable to sin.

111. Who, then, is He by the wound of Whose stripes we are healed but Christ the Lord? Of Whom the same Isaiah prophesied His stripes were our healing, Isaiah 53:5 of Whom Paul the Apostle wrote in his epistle: Who knew no sin, but was made sin for us. 2 Corinthians 5:21 This, indeed, was divine in Him, that His Flesh did no sin, nor did the creature of the body take in Him sin. For what wonder would it be if the Godhead alone sinned not, seeing It had no incentives to sin? But if God alone is free from sin, certainly every creature by its own nature can be, as we have said, liable to sin.

Chapter 10.

That the Spirit forgives sin is something He shares in common with the Father and the Son, but not with the Angels.

That the Spirit forgives sin is common to Him with the Father and the Son, but not with the Angels.

Tell me, then, whoever you are who deny the deity of the Holy Spirit: the Spirit could not be subject to sin when He actually forgives sin. Does an Angel forgive sin? Does an Archangel? Certainly not—only the Father alone, the Son alone, and the Holy Spirit alone forgive sin. Now no one is unable to avoid what he has the power to forgive.

112. Tell me, then, whoever you are who deny the Godhead of the Holy Spirit. The Spirit could not be liable to sin, Who rather forgives sin. Does an Angel forgive? Does an Archangel? Certainly not, but the Father alone, the Son alone, and the Holy Spirit alone. Now no one is unable to avoid that which he has power to forgive.

113. But perhaps someone will say that the Seraph said to Isaiah: "Behold, this has touched your lips, and shall take away your iniquities, and purge away your sins." He says "shall take away" and "shall purge," not "I will take away," but rather that fire from the altar of God—that is, the grace of the Spirit—will do so. For what else can we piously understand to be on the altar of God but the grace of the Spirit? Certainly not the wood from the forests, nor the soot and coals. Or what is more in accordance with piety than to understand according to the mystery that it was revealed through the mouth of Isaiah that all people should be cleansed by the passion of Christ, who as a coal according to the flesh burnt up our sins, as you read in Zechariah: "Is not this a brand cast forth from the fire?" And that was Joshua clothed in filthy garments.

113. But perhaps some one will say that the Seraph said to Isaiah: Behold, this has touched your lips, and shall take away your iniquities, and purge away your sins. Isaiah 6:7 Shall take away, he says, and shall purge, not I will take away, but that fire from the altar of God, that is, the grace of the Spirit. For what else can we piously understand to be on the altar of God but the grace of the Spirit? Certainly not the wood of the forests, nor the soot and coals. Or what is so in accordance with piety as to understand according to the mystery that it was revealed by the mouth of Isaiah that all men should be cleansed by the passion of Christ, Who as a coal according to the flesh burnt up our sins, as you read in Zechariah: Is not this a brand cast forth from the fire? And that was Joshua clothed in filthy garments. Zechariah 3:2-3

Finally, so that we may know that this mystery of our common redemption was most clearly revealed by the prophets, you have also in this passage: "Look, it has taken away your sins." This does not mean that Christ put aside His own sins—He who committed no sin—but rather that through the flesh of Christ the entire human race would be freed from their sins.

114. Lastly, that we may know that this mystery of the common redemption was most clearly revealed by the prophets, you have also in this place: Lo, it has taken away your sins; not that Christ put aside His sins Who did no sin, but that in the flesh of Christ the whole human race should be loosed from their sins.

115. But even if the Seraph had taken away sin, it would have been as one of God's ministers appointed to this mystery. For Isaiah said: "For one of the Seraphim was sent to me."

115. But even if the Seraph had taken away sin, it would have been as one of the ministers of God appointed to this mystery. For thus said Isaiah: For one of the Seraphim was sent to me. Isaiah 6:6

Chapter 11.

The Spirit is sent to all and does not move from place to place, because He is not limited by either time or space. He goes forth from the Son, just as the Son goes forth from the Father, in Whom He always abides, and He also comes to us when we receive Him. He comes in the same manner as the Father Himself, from Whom He can in no way be separated.

The Spirit is sent to all, and passes not from place to place, for He is not limited either by time or space. He goes forth from the Son, as the Son from the Father, in Whom He ever abides: and also comes to us when we receive. He comes also after the same manner as the Father Himself, from Whom He can by no means be separated.

The Spirit is indeed said to be sent, but the Seraph is sent to one person, while the Spirit is sent to all. The Seraph is sent to serve, but the Spirit works a mystery. The Seraph carries out what is commanded, while the Spirit divides as He wills. The Seraph moves from place to place because he does not fill all things, but is himself filled by the Spirit. The Seraph descends with a certain manner of movement according to his nature, but we cannot think this way about the Spirit, of Whom the Son of God says: When the Paraclete shall come, even the Spirit of Truth, Whom I send unto you, Who proceeds from the Father.

116. The Spirit, also, is indeed said to be sent, but the Seraph to one, the Spirit to all. The Seraph is sent to minister, the Spirit works a mystery. The Seraph performs what is commanded, the Spirit divides as He wills. The Seraph passes from place to place, for he does not fill all things, but is himself filled by the Spirit. The Seraph comes down with a certain mode of passage according to his nature, but we cannot think this of the Spirit, of Whom the Son of God says: When the Paraclete shall come, even the Spirit of Truth, Whom I send unto you, Who proceeds from the Father. John 15:26

If the Spirit moves from one place to another, then both the Father and the Son would also have to be found in a place. If the Spirit goes forth from a place when the Father or the Son sends Him, then certainly the Spirit, by moving from one place and progressing forward, would seem—according to these impious interpretations—to leave both the Father and the Son behind, as if they were some kind of material body.

117. For if the Spirit proceeds from a place and passes to a place, both the Father Himself will be found in a place, and the Son likewise. If He goes forth from a place, Whom the Father or the Son sends, certainly the Spirit passing from a place, and making progress, seems to leave, according to those impious interpretations, both the Father and the Son like some material body.

I am saying this with reference to those who claim that the Spirit comes down by movement. But the Father, Who is above all things not only of corporeal nature but also of the invisible creation, is not confined to any place. Nor is the Son, Who as the Creator of all creation is above every creature, enclosed by the places or times of His own works. Nor is the Spirit of Truth, being the Spirit of God, confined by any corporeal boundaries. Since He is incorporeal, He is far above the whole rational creation through the ineffable fullness of His Godhead, having power over all things to breathe where He wills and to inspire as He wills. John 3:8

118. I am saying this with reference to those who say that the Spirit comes down by movement. But neither the Father, Who is above all not only of corporeal nature, but also of the invisible creation, is circumscribed in any place; nor is the Son, Who, as the Worker of all creation, is above every creature, enclosed by the places or times of His own works; nor is the Spirit of Truth as being the Spirit of God, circumscribed by any corporeal limits, Who since He is incorporeal is far above the whole rational creation through the ineffable fullness of His Godhead, having over all things the power of breathing where He wills, and of inspiring as He wills. John 3:8

The Spirit is not sent from a location, nor does He proceed from a location when He proceeds from the Son. The Son Himself, when He says, "I came forth from the Father, and have come into the world," destroys all notions that can be understood as movement from place to place. Similarly, when we read that God is within or without, we certainly do not either confine God within any body or separate Him from any body. Rather, weighing these things with deep and ineffable consideration, we comprehend the hiddenness of the divine nature.

119. The Spirit is not, then, sent as it were from a place, nor does He proceed as from a place, when He proceeds from the Son, as the Son Himself, when He says, I came forth from the Father, and have come into the world, destroys all fancies, which can be reckoned as from place to place. In like manner, also, when we read that God is within or without, we certainly do not either enclose God within anybody or separate Him from anybody, but weighing these things in a deep and ineffable estimation, we comprehend the hiddenness of the divine nature.

Finally, Wisdom speaks of coming forth from the mouth of the Most High in such a way that she is not external to the Father, but with the Father; for the Word was with God. And not only with God but also in God, for He says: I am in the Father and the Father is in Me. But when He goes forth from the Father, He does not depart from a place, nor is He separated as one body from another body. Nor when He is in the Father is He like a body enclosed within another body. The Holy Spirit also, when He proceeds from the Father and the Son, is not separated from the Father nor separated from the Son. For how could He be separated from the Father when He is the Spirit of His mouth? This is certainly both a proof of His eternity and expresses the Unity of this Godhead.

120. Lastly, Wisdom so says that she came forth from the mouth of the Most High, Ecclesiastes 24:5 as not to be external to the Father, but with the Father; for the Word was with God; John 1:1 and not only with God but also in God; for He says: I am in the Father and the Father is in Me. But neither when He goes forth from the Father does He retire from a place, nor is He separated as a body from a body; nor when He is in the Father is He as if a body enclosed as it were in a body. The Holy Spirit also, when He proceeds from the Father and the Son, is not separated from the Father nor separated from the Son. For how could He be separated from the Father Who is the Spirit of His mouth? Which is certainly both a proof of His eternity, and expresses the Unity of this Godhead.

He exists, then, and always abides, He who is the Spirit of His mouth, but He seems to come down when we receive Him, so that He may dwell in us and we may not be strangers to His grace. He seems to us to come down, not because He actually does come down, but because our mind ascends to Him. We would speak more fully about this if we did not remember that in the former treatise it was set forth that the Father said, "Let us go down and confound their language," and that the Son said, "He who loves Me will keep My word, and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our abode with him."

121. He exists then, and abides always, Who is the Spirit of His mouth, but He seems to come down when we receive Him, that He may dwell in us, that we may not be alien from His grace. To us He seems to come down, not that He does come down, but that our mind ascends to Him. Of which we would speak more fully did we not remember that in the former treatise there was set forth that the Father said: Let us go down and confound their language, Genesis 11:7 and that the Son said: He that loves Me will keep My saying, and My Father will love him, and We will come to Him and make Our abode with Him. John 14:23

The Spirit comes in the same way the Father does, because where the Father is, the Son is also there, and where the Son is, the Holy Spirit is there too. Therefore, we should not think that the Holy Spirit comes separately. But He does not move from place to place; rather, He comes from the arrangement of the divine order to the safety of redemption, from the grace that gives life to the grace of sanctification, to transfer us from earth to heaven, from misery to glory, from slavery to a kingdom.

122. The Spirit, then, so comes as does the Father, for where the Father is there is also the Son, and where the Son is there is the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit, therefore, is not to be supposed to come separately. But He comes not from place to place, but from the disposition of the order to the safety of redemption, from the grace of giving life to that of sanctification, to translate us from earth to heaven, from wretchedness to glory, from slavery to a kingdom.

The Spirit comes, then, just as the Father comes. For the Son said, "I and the Father will come, and will make Our abode with Him" (John 14:23). Does the Father come in a bodily way? The Spirit comes in the same manner, and when He comes, the full presence of the Father and the Son is in Him.

123. The Spirit comes, then, as the Father comes. For the Son said, I and the Father will come, and will make Our abode with Him. John 14:23 Does the Father come in a bodily fashion? Thus, then, comes the Spirit in Whom, when He comes, is the full presence of the Father and the Son.

124. But who can separate the Spirit from the Father and the Son, since we cannot even name the Father and the Son without the Spirit? For no one says Lord Jesus, except in the Holy Spirit. If, then, we cannot call Jesus Lord except in the Holy Spirit, we certainly cannot proclaim Him without the Spirit. But if the Angels also proclaim Jesus to be Lord, Whom no one can proclaim except in the Spirit, then in them also the work of the Holy Spirit is active.

124. But who can separate the Spirit from the Father and the Son, since we cannot even name the Father and the Son without the Spirit? For no one says Lord Jesus, except in the Holy Spirit? 1 Corinthians 12:3 If, then, we cannot call Jesus Lord except in the Holy Spirit, we certainly cannot proclaim Him without the Spirit. But if the Angels also proclaim Jesus to be Lord, Whom no one can proclaim except in the Spirit, then in them also the office of the Holy Spirit operates.

We have therefore proven that the presence and grace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are one. This unity is so heavenly and divine that the Son gives thanks to the Father for it, saying, "I give thanks to You, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because You have hidden these things from the wise and prudent, and have revealed them to babes."

125. We have proved, then, that the presence and the grace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are one, which is so heavenly and divine that the Son gives thanks therefore to the Father, saying, I give thanks to You, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because You have hidden these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes. Matthew 11:25

Chapter 12.

The peace and grace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are one, and likewise their charity is one, which was shown especially in the redemption of humanity. Their communion with humanity is also one.

The peace and grace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are one, so also is Their charity one, which showed itself chiefly in the redemption of man. Their communion with man is also one.

Since the calling is one, the grace is also one. Finally, it is written: "Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ" (Romans 1:7). You see, then, that we are told the grace of the Father and the Son is one, and the peace of the Father and the Son is one. But this grace and peace is the fruit of the Spirit, as the Apostle himself taught us, saying: "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience" (Galatians 5:22). And peace is good and necessary so that no one is troubled with doubtful arguments or shaken by the storm of bodily passions, but so that a person's desires may remain quietly ordered toward the worship of God, with simplicity of faith and tranquility of mind.

126. Therefore since the calling is one, the grace is also one. Lastly, it is written: Grace unto you and peace from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ. Romans 1:7 You see, then, that we are told that the grace of the Father and the Son is one, and the peace of the Father and the Son is one, but this grace and peace is the fruit of the Spirit, as the Apostle taught us himself, saying: But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience. Galatians 5:22 And peace is good and necessary that no one be troubled with doubtful disputations, nor be shaken by the storm of bodily passions, but that his affections may remain quietly disposed as to the worship of God, with simplicity of faith and tranquillity of mind.

Regarding peace, we have already proven the point. But concerning grace, the prophet Zechariah says that God promised to pour upon Jerusalem the spirit of grace and mercy, and the Apostle Peter says: Repent and be baptized every one of you in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and you shall receive the grace of the Holy Spirit. So grace comes from the Holy Spirit just as it does from the Father and the Son. For how can there be grace without the Spirit, since all divine grace is in the Spirit?

127. As to peace we have proved the point; but as to grace the prophet Zechariah says, that God promised to pour upon Jerusalem the spirit of grace and mercy, Zechariah 12:10 and the Apostle Peter says: Repent and be baptized every one of you in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and you shall receive the grace of the Holy Spirit. Acts 2:38 So grace comes also of the Holy Spirit as of the Father and the Son. For how can there be grace without the Spirit, since all divine grace is in the Spirit?

128. We read not only about the peace and grace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, but also, faithful Emperor, about their love and communion. Concerning love, it has been said: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God. 2 Corinthians 13:14 We have heard of the Father's love. The same love that belongs to the Father also belongs to the Son. For He Himself said: He that loves Me shall be loved of My Father, and I will love him. John 14:21 And what is the Son's love, except that He offered Himself for us and redeemed us with His own blood. Ephesians 5:2 But the same love exists in the Father, for it is written: God so loved the world, that He gave His Only-begotten Son. John 3:16

128. Nor do we read only of the peace and grace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, but also, faithful Emperor, of the love and communion. For of love it has been said: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God. 2 Corinthians 13:14 We have heard of the love of the Father. The same love which is the Father's is also the Son's. For He Himself said: He that loves Me shall be loved of My Father, and I will love him. John 14:21 And what is the love of the Son, but that He offered Himself for us, and redeemed us with His own blood. Ephesians 5:2 But the same love is in the Father, for it is written: God so loved the world, that He gave His Only-begotten Son. John 3:16

So then, the Father gave the Son, and the Son gave Himself. Love is preserved and proper affection is not violated, for affection is not violated when there is no suffering in the giving up. He gave One who was willing, He gave One who offered Himself. The Father did not give the Son to punishment but to grace. If you examine the merit of the act, examine the nature of the affection. The vessel of election clearly shows the unity of this divine love, because both the Father gave the Son and the Son gave Himself. The Father gave, who did not spare His own Son but gave Him up for us all. And of the Son he also says: Who gave Himself for me. He gave Himself, he says. If it is of grace, what fault do I find? If it is that He suffered wrong, I owe all the more.

129. So, then, the Father gave the Son, and the Son gave Himself. Love is preserved and due affection is not wronged, for affection is not wronged where there is no distress in the giving up. He gave one Who was willing, He gave One Who offered Himself, the Father did not give the Son to punishment but to grace. If you enquire into the merit of the deed, enquire into the description of the affection. The vessel of election shows plainly the unity of this divine love, because both the Father gave the Son and the Son gave Himself. The Father gave, Who spared not His own Son, but gave Him up for us all. Romans 8:32 And of the Son he also says: Who gave Himself for me. Galatians 2:20 Gave Himself, he says. If it be of grace, what do I find fault with. If it be that He suffered wrong, I owe the more.

Learn that just as the Father gave the Son and the Son gave Himself, the Holy Spirit also gave Him. For it is written: Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. So the loving Spirit also gave the Son of God. Since the love of the Father and the Son is one, we have shown that this love of God is poured out by the Holy Spirit and is the fruit of the Holy Spirit, because the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience.

130. But learn that in like manner as the Father gave the Son, and the Son gave Himself, so, too, the Holy Spirit gave Him. For it is written: Then was Jesus led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. So, too, the loving Spirit gave the Son of God. For as the love of the Father and the Son is one, so, too, we have shown that this love of God is shed abroad by the Holy Spirit, and is the fruit of the Holy Spirit, because the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience. Galatians 5:22

It is clear that there is communion between the Father and the Son, for Scripture says: And our communion is with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ. And elsewhere: The communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all. If the peace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit is one, the grace one, the love one, and the communion one, then certainly the working is one. And where the working is one, the power certainly cannot be divided nor the substance separated. For if it were otherwise, how could the grace of the same working be in agreement?

131. And that there is communion between the Father and the Son is plain, for it is written: And our communion is with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ. 1 John 1:3 And in another place: The communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all. 2 Corinthians 13:14 If, then, the peace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit is one, the grace one, the love one, and the communion one, the working is certainly one, and where the working is one, certainly the power cannot be divided nor the substance separated. For, if so, how could the grace of the same working agree?

Chapter 13.

Saint Ambrose demonstrates from the Scriptures that the three divine Persons share one Name. He begins by showing the unity of the Name of the Son and the Holy Spirit, since each is called Paraclete and Truth.

St. Ambrose shows from the Scriptures that the Name of the Three Divine Persons is one, and first the unity of the Name of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, inasmuch as each is called Paraclete and Truth.

Who, then, would dare to deny that the Name is one when they see that the working is one? But why should I argue for the unity of the Name when there is the clear testimony of God's own voice that the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit is one? For it is written: Go, baptize all nations in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. He said "in the Name," not "in the Names." Therefore, the Name of the Father is not one thing, the Name of the Son another, and the Name of the Holy Spirit yet another, for God is one. The Names are not multiple, for there are not two Gods or three Gods.

132. Who, then, would dare to deny the oneness of Name, when he sees the oneness of the working. But why should I maintain the unity of the Name by arguments, when there is the plain testimony of the Divine Voice that the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit is one? For it is written: Go, baptize all nations in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Matthew 28:19 He said, in the Name, not in the Names. So, then, the Name of the Father is not one, that of the Son another, and that of the Holy Spirit another, for God is one; the Names are not more than one, for there are not two Gods, or three Gods.

And to reveal that the Godhead is one and the Majesty is one—because the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit is one—and that the Son did not come in one Name while the Holy Spirit came in another, the Lord Himself said: "I have come in My Father's Name, and you did not receive Me. If another shall come in his own name, you will receive him." John 5:43

132. And that He might reveal that the Godhead is one and the Majesty one, because the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit is one, and the Son did not come in one Name and the Holy Spirit in another, the Lord Himself said: I have come in My Father's Name, and you did not receive Me, if another shall come in his own name you will receive him. John 5:43

Scripture makes clear that the Father's Name is also the Son's Name, for the Lord said in Exodus: I will go before you in My Name, and will call by My Name the Lord before you. So then, the Lord said that He would call the Lord by His Name. Therefore, the Lord is the Name of both the Father and the Son.

133. And Scripture makes clear that that which is the Father's Name, the same is also that of the Son, for the Lord said in Exodus: I will go before you in My Name, and will call by My Name the Lord before you. Exodus 33:19 So, then, the Lord said that He would call the Lord by His Name. The Lord, then, is the Name of the Father and of the Son.

Since the Name of the Father and of the Son is one, understand that this same Name also belongs to the Holy Spirit, because the Holy Spirit came in the Name of the Son, as it is written: But the Paraclete, even the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My Name, He shall teach you all things. But He who came in the Name of the Son also certainly came in the Name of the Father, since the Name of the Father and of the Son is one. Therefore it follows that the Name of the Father and of the Son is also that of the Holy Spirit. For there is no other Name given under heaven by which we must be saved.

134. But since the Name of the Father and of the Son is one, learn that the same is the Name of the Holy Spirit also, since the Holy Spirit came in the Name of the Son, as it is written: But the Paraclete, even the Holy Spirit, Whom the Father will send in My Name, He shall teach you all things. John 14:26 But He Who came in the Name of the Son came also certainly in the Name of the Father, for the Name of the Father and of the Son is one. Thus it comes to pass that the Name of the Father and of the Son is also that of the Holy Spirit. For there is no other Name given under heaven wherein we must be saved. Acts 4:12

At the same time, He showed that we must teach the oneness of the Divine Name, not difference, since Christ came in the oneness of the Name, but Antichrist will come in his own name, as it is written: I have come in My Father's Name, and you did not receive Me, if another shall come in his own name, you will receive him.

155. At the same time He showed that the oneness of the Divine Name must be taught, not the difference, since Christ came in the oneness of the Name, but Antichrist will come in his own name, as it is written: I have come in My Father's Name, and you did not receive Me, if another shall come in his own name, you will receive him. John 5:43

156. These passages clearly teach us that there is no difference of Name among the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. What is the Name of the Father is also the Name of the Son, and likewise what is the Name of the Son is also the Name of the Holy Spirit, since the Son is also called Paraclete, just as the Holy Spirit is. Therefore the Lord Jesus says in the Gospel: I will ask My Father, and He shall give you another Paraclete, to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of Truth. John 14:16 He rightly said another, so that you would not think the Son is also the Spirit. The oneness is of the Name, not a Sabellian confusion of the Son and the Spirit.

156. We are, then, clearly taught by these passages that there is no difference of Name in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; and that that which is the Name of the Father is also the Name of the Son, and likewise that which is the Name of the Son is also that of the Holy Spirit, when the Son also is called Paraclete, as is the Holy Spirit. And therefore does the Lord Jesus say in the Gospel: I will ask My Father, and He shall give you another Paraclete, to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of Truth. John 14:16 And He said well another, that you might not suppose that the Son is also the Spirit, for oneness is of the Name, not a Sabellian confusion of the Son and of the Spirit.

The Son is one Paraclete, and the Holy Spirit is another Paraclete. John called the Son a Paraclete, as you can see: "If any man sin, we have a Paraclete with the Father, Jesus Christ." Therefore, just as there is a oneness of name, there is also a oneness of power, because where the Paraclete Spirit is, the Son is also present.

157. So, then, the Son is one Paraclete, the Holy Spirit another Paraclete; for John called the Son a Paraclete, as you find: If any man sin, we have a Paraclete [Advocate] with the Father, Jesus Christ. 1 John 2:1 So in like manner as there is a oneness of name, so, too, is there a oneness of power, for where the Paraclete Spirit is, there is also the Son.

Just as the Lord says in this passage that the Spirit will be with the faithful forever, so too He shows elsewhere that He Himself will be with the apostles forever, saying: "Lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the world." Therefore the Son and the Spirit are one, the Name of the Trinity is one, and the Presence one and indivisible.

158. For as the Lord says in this place that the Spirit will be forever with the faithful, so, too, does He elsewhere show that He will Himself be forever with the apostles, saying: Lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the world. Matthew 28:20 Therefore the Son and the Spirit are one, the Name of the Trinity is one, and the Presence one and indivisible.

Just as we demonstrate that the Son is called the Paraclete, we also demonstrate that the Spirit is called the Truth. Christ is the Truth, the Spirit is the Truth, for you find in John's epistle: "For the Spirit is Truth." Therefore, the Spirit is not only called the Spirit of Truth, but also the Truth itself, just as the Son is also declared to be the Truth, who says: "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life."

159. But as we show that the Son is called the Paraclete, so, too, do we show that the Spirit is called the Truth. Christ is the Truth, the Spirit is the Truth, for you find in John's epistle: For the Spirit is Truth. 1 John 5:7 Not only, then, is the Spirit called the Spirit of Truth, but also the Truth, as the Son is also declared to be the Truth, Who says: I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. John 14:6

Chapter 14.

Each Person of the Trinity is called Light in the sacred writings. The Spirit is designated as Fire by Isaiah, a symbol of which Fire was seen by Moses in the bush, in the tongues of fire, and in Gideon's pitchers. And the Godhead of the same Spirit cannot be denied, since His operation is the same as that of the Father and of the Son, and He is also called the light and fire of the Lord's countenance.

Each Person of the Trinity is said in the sacred writings to be Light. The Spirit is designated Fire by Isaiah, a figure of which Fire was seen in the bush by Moses, in the tongues of fire, and in Gideon's pitchers. And the Godhead of the same Spirit cannot be denied, since His operation is the same as that of the Father and of the Son, and He is also called the light and fire of the Lord's countenance.

But why should I argue that just as the Father is light, so too the Son is light, and the Holy Spirit is light? This certainly belongs to the power of God. For God is Light, as John said: "For God is Light, and in Him is no darkness."

160. But why should I argue that as the Father is light, so, too, the Son is light, and the Holy Spirit is light? Which certainly pertains to the power of God. For God is Light, as John said: For God is Light, and in Him is no darkness. 1 John 1:5

The Son is also Light, because "the Life was the Light of men." The Evangelist, to show that he was speaking of the Son of God, says of John the Baptist: "He was not light, but was sent to be a witness of the Light. That was the true Light, which lights every man that comes into this world." Therefore, since God is Light, and the Son of God is the true Light, the Son of God is without doubt true God.

161. But the Son, too, is Light, because the Life was the Light of men. John 1:8 And the Evangelist, that he might show that he was speaking of the Son of God, says of John the Baptist: He was not light, but [was sent] to be a witness of the Light. That was the true Light, which lights every man that comes into this world. John 1:9 So, then, since God is Light, and the Son of God the true Light, without doubt the Son of God is true God.

You can find elsewhere that the Son of God is Light: "The people that sat in darkness and in the shadow of death have seen a great light." But what is even clearer is this statement: "For with You is the fount of Life, and in Your light we shall see light." This means that with You, O God the Father Almighty, who are the Fount of Life, in Your Son who is the Light, we shall see the light of the Holy Spirit. The Lord Himself demonstrates this, saying: "Receive the Holy Spirit," and elsewhere: "Virtue went out from Him."

162. And you find elsewhere that the Son of God is Light: The people that sat in darkness and in the shadow of death have seen a great light. Isaiah 9:2 But, which is still more clear, it is said: For with You is the fount of Life, and in Your light we shall see light, which means that with You, O God the Father Almighty, Who art the Fount of Life, in Your Son Who is the Light, we shall see the light of the Holy Spirit. As the Lord Himself shows, saying: Receive the Holy Spirit, John 20:22 and elsewhere: Virtue went out from Him. Luke 6:19

But who can doubt that the Father is Light, when we read of His Son that He is the Brightness of eternal Light? For the Son is the Brightness of none other than the Father. He is always with the Father and always shines, not with a different radiance but with the same radiance.

163. But who can doubt that the Father is Light, when we read of His Son that He is the Brightness of eternal Light? For of Whom but of the Father is the Son the Brightness, Who both is always with the Father, and always shines, not with unlike but with the same radiance.

Isaiah shows that the Holy Spirit is not only Light but also Fire, saying: "And the light of Israel shall be for a fire." So the prophets called Him a burning Fire, because in these three aspects we see more intensely the majesty of the Godhead: since to sanctify belongs to the Godhead, to illuminate is the property of fire and light, and the Godhead is customarily pointed out or seen in the appearance of fire—for "our God is a consuming Fire," as Moses said.

164. And Isaiah shows that the Holy Spirit is not only Light but also Fire, saying: And the light of Israel shall be for a fire. Isaiah 10:17 So the prophets called Him a burning Fire, because in those three points we see more intensely the majesty of the Godhead; since to sanctify is of the Godhead, to illuminate is the property of fire and light, and the Godhead is wont to be pointed out or seen in the appearance of fire: For our God is a consuming Fire, as Moses said. Deuteronomy 4:24

165. For Moses himself saw the fire in the bush and had heard God when the voice from the flame of fire came to him saying: I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. The voice came from the fire, and the voice was in the bush, and the fire did no harm. For the bush was burning but was not consumed, because in that mystery the Lord was showing that He would come to illuminate the thorns of our body, and not to destroy those who were in misery, but to relieve their misery. He would baptize with the Holy Spirit and with fire, so that He might give grace and destroy sin. So in the symbol of fire God maintains His purpose.

165. For he himself saw the fire in the bush, and had heard God when the voice from the flame of fire came to him saying: I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. Exodus 3:6 The voice came from the fire, and the voice was in the bush, and the fire did no harm. For the bush was burning but was not consumed, because in that mystery the Lord was showing that He would come to illuminate the thorns of our body, and not to consume those who were in misery, but to alleviate their misery; Who would baptize with the Holy Spirit and with fire, that He might give grace and destroy sin. Matthew 3:11 So in the symbol of fire God keeps His intention.

In the Acts of the Apostles as well, when the Holy Spirit descended upon the faithful, the appearance of fire was seen, for you read this: And suddenly there was a sound from heaven, as though the Spirit were being carried with great force, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting, and there appeared to them divided tongues like fire.

166. In the Acts of the Apostles, also, when the Holy Spirit had descended upon the faithful, the appearance of fire was seen, for you read thus: And suddenly there was a sound from heaven, as though the Spirit were borne with great vehemence, and it filled all the house where they were sitting, and there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire. Acts 2:2-3

167. For the same reason, when Gideon was about to overcome the Midianites, he commanded three hundred men to take pitchers and to hold lighted torches inside the pitchers and trumpets in their right hands. Our predecessors have preserved the explanation received from the apostles: the pitchers are our bodies, fashioned of clay, which know no fear if they burn with the fervor of the grace of the Spirit and bear witness to the passion of the Lord Jesus with a loud confession of the Voice.

167. For the same reason was it that when Gideon was about to overcome the Midianites, he commanded three hundred men to take pitchers, and to hold lighted torches inside the pitchers, and trumpets in their right hands. Our predecessors have preserved the explanation received from the apostles, that the pitchers are our bodies, fashioned of clay, which know not fear if they burn with the fervour of the grace of the Spirit, and bear witness to the passion of the Lord Jesus with a loud confession of the Voice.

Who, then, can doubt the Godhead of the Holy Spirit, since wherever the grace of the Spirit is present, there the manifestation of the Godhead appears? From this evidence we conclude not a diversity but the unity of the divine power. For how can there be a separation of power where the effect of the working in all is one?

168. Who, then, can doubt of the Godhead of the Holy Spirit, since where the grace of the Spirit is, there the manifestation of the Godhead appears. By which evidence we infer not a diversity but the unity of the divine power. For how can there be a severance of power, where the effect of the working in all is one?

What, then, is that fire? Certainly not one made up of ordinary sticks or roaring with burning reeds from the forest, but that fire which refines good deeds like gold and consumes sins like stubble. This is undoubtedly the Holy Spirit, who is called both the fire and light of the countenance of God—light as we said earlier: "The light of Your countenance has been sealed upon us, O Lord." What, then, is the light that is sealed, except that of the seal of the Spirit? For Scripture says, "believing in whom, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise."

169. What, then, is that fire? Not certainly one made up of common twigs, or roaring with the burning of the reeds of the woods, but that fire which improves good deeds like gold, and consumes sins like stubble. This is undoubtedly the Holy Spirit, Who is called both the fire and light of the countenance of God; light as we said above: The light of Your countenance has been sealed upon us, O Lord. What is, then, the light that is sealed, but that of the seal of the Spirit, believing in Whom, you were sealed, he says, with the Holy Spirit of promise. Ephesians 1:13

And just as there is a light of the divine countenance, so too does fire shine forth from the countenance of God, for it is written: A fire shall burn in His sight. For the grace of the day of judgment shines beforehand, so that forgiveness may follow to reward the service of the saints. What great fullness the Scriptures have, which no one can comprehend with human genius! What a tremendous proof of the Divine Unity! For how many things are pointed out in these two verses!

170. And as there is a light of the divine countenance, so, too, does fire shine forth from the countenance of God, for it is written: A fire shall burn in His sight. For the grace of the day of judgment shines beforehand, that forgiveness may follow to reward the service of the saints. O the great fullness of the Scriptures, which no one can comprehend with human genius! O greatest proof of the Divine Unity! For how many things are pointed out in these two verses!

Chapter 15.

The Holy Spirit is Life equally with the Father and the Son. In truth, whether the Father is mentioned, with whom is the Fountain of Life, or the Son, that Fountain can be none other than the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit is Life equally with the Father and the Son, in truth whether the Father be mentioned, with Whom is the Fount of Life, or the Son, that Fount can be none other than the Holy Spirit.

We have said that the Father is Light, the Son is Light, and the Holy Spirit is Light. Let us also learn that the Father is Life, the Son is Life, and the Holy Spirit is Life. For John said: "That which was from the beginning, that which we have heard, and which we have seen, and have beheld with our eyes, and our hands have handled concerning the Word of Life; and the Life appeared, and we saw and testify, and declare to you of that Life which was with the Father." He said both "Word of Life" and "Life" so that he might show that both the Father and the Son are Life. For what is the Word of Life except the Word of God? And by this phrase both God and the Word of God are shown to be Life. And just as it is said "the Word of Life," so too "the Spirit of Life." Therefore, just as the Word of Life is Life, so too the Spirit of Life is Life.

171. We have said that the Father is Light, the Son is Light, and the Holy Spirit is Light; let us also learn that the Father is Life, the Son Life, and the Holy Spirit Life. For John said: That which was from the beginning, that which we have heard, and which we have seen, and have beheld with our eyes, and our hands have handled concerning the Word of Life; and the Life appeared, and we saw and testify, and declare to you of that Life which was with the Father. 1 John 1:1-2 He said both Word of Life and Life that he might signify both the Father and the Son to be Life. For what is the Word of Life but the Word of God? And by this phrase both God and the Word of God are shown to be Life. And as it is said the Word of Life, so, too, the Spirit of Life. Therefore, as the Word of Life is Life, so, too, the Spirit of Life is Life.

Learn now that just as the Father is the source of Life, many writers have also declared that the Son is identified as the source of Life. As it says, "with You, Almighty God, Your Son is the source of Life." This is the source of the Holy Spirit, because the Spirit is Life, as the Lord says: "The words which I speak to you are Spirit and Life" (John 6:64). For where the Spirit is, there also is Life, and where Life is, there also is the Holy Spirit.

172. Learn now that as the Father is the Fount of Life, so, too, many have stated that the Son is signified as the Fount of Life; so that, he says, with You, Almighty God, Your Son is the Fount of Life. That is the Fount of the Holy Spirit, for the Spirit is Life, as the Lord says: The words which I speak unto you are Spirit and Life, John 6:64 for where the Spirit is, there also is Life; and where Life is, is also the Holy Spirit.

Many people, however, think that in this passage only the Father is signified by the Fount. But let them notice what Scripture says: "With You is the Well of Life." This means the Son is with the Father, since the Word was with God, Who was in the beginning and was with God.

173. Many, however, consider that in this passage the Father only is signified by the Fount. Let them, however, notice what the Scripture relates: With You is the Well of Life. That is, the Son is with the Father; since the Word was with God, Who was in the beginning, and was with God.

However, whether we understand the Fount in this passage to refer to the Father or the Son, we certainly do not understand it as a fount of created water, but rather the Fount of divine grace, that is, of the Holy Spirit, for He is the living water. This is why the Lord said: If you know the gift of God, and Who He is that says to you, Give me to drink, you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water. John 4:10

174. But whether in this place one understands the Fount to be the Father or the Son, we certainly do not understand a fount of that water which is created, but the Fount of that divine grace, that is, of the Holy Spirit, for He is the living water. Wherefore the Lord said: If you know the gift of God, and Who He is that says to you, Give me to drink, you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water. John 4:10

This was the water for which David's soul thirsted. The hart desires the fountain of these waters, not thirsting for the poison of serpents. For the water of the grace of the Spirit is living, so that it may purify the inner parts of the mind, wash away every sin of the soul, and cleanse the transgression of hidden faults.

175. This was the water for which the soul of David thirsted. The hart desires the fountain of these waters, not thirsting for the poison of serpents. For the water of the grace of the Spirit is living, that it may purify the inner parts of the mind, and wash away every sin of the soul, and purify the transgression of hidden faults.

Chapter 16.

The Holy Spirit is that great river which waters the mystical Jerusalem. It is equal to its Source, that is, the Father and the Son, as holy Scripture indicates. St. Ambrose himself thirsts for that water, and warns us that to keep it within us, we must avoid the devil, lust, and heresy, because our vessels are fragile, and that broken cisterns must be abandoned, so that following the example of the Samaritan woman and of the patriarchs we may find the water of the Lord.

The Holy Spirit is that large river by which the mystical Jerusalem is watered. It is equal to its Fount, that is, the Father and the Son, as is signified in holy Scripture. St. Ambrose himself thirsts for that water, and warns us that in order to preserve it within us, we must avoid the devil, lust, and heresy, since our vessels are frail, and that broken cisterns must be forsaken, that after the example of the Samaritan woman and of the patriarchs we may find the water of the Lord.

But in case anyone should object to what might seem like the smallness of the Spirit, and from this try to establish a difference in greatness—arguing that water appears to be only a small part of a fountain—even though examples drawn from creation seem completely unsuitable for applying to the Godhead, yet to prevent them from drawing any wrong conclusions from this comparison taken from creatures, let them learn that the Holy Spirit is called not only Water but also a River, as we read: "From his belly shall flow rivers of living water. But this He said of the Spirit, whom those who were beginning to believe in Him were about to receive." John 7:38-39

176. But lest perchance any one should speak against as it were the littleness of the Spirit, and from this should endeavour to establish a difference in greatness, arguing that water seems to be but a small part of a Fount, although examples taken from creatures seem by no means suitable for application to the Godhead; yet lest they should judge anything injuriously from this comparison taken from creatures, let them learn that not only is the Holy Spirit called Water, but also a River, as we read: From his belly shall flow rivers of living water. But this He said of the Spirit, Whom they were beginning to receive, who were about to believe in Him. John 7:38-39

So then, the Holy Spirit is the River, and the abundant River, which according to the Hebrews flowed from Jesus in the lands, as we have received it prophesied through the mouth of Isaiah. This is the great River that flows continually and never fails. And not only a river, but also one of abundant stream and overflowing greatness, as David also said: The stream of the river makes the city of God glad.

177. So, then, the Holy Spirit is the River, and the abundant River, which according to the Hebrews flowed from Jesus in the lands, as we have received it prophesied by the mouth of Isaiah. Isaiah 66:12 This is the great River which flows always and never fails. And not only a river, but also one of copious stream and overflowing greatness, as also David said: The stream of the river makes glad the city of God.

The heavenly Jerusalem is not watered by any earthly river. Rather, the Holy Spirit, who proceeds from the Fountain of Life, flows there. Though a brief taste of Him satisfies us, He seems to flow far more abundantly among the heavenly Thrones, Dominions and Powers, Angels and Archangels, rushing forth in the full course of the seven virtues of the Spirit. If an earthly river overflows when it rises above its banks, how much more does the Spirit overflow when He rises above every creature? When He reaches what are like the low-lying fields of our minds, He brings joy to the heavenly nature of these creatures through the greater fertility of His sanctification.

178. For neither is that city, the heavenly Jerusalem, watered by the channel of any earthly river, but that Holy Spirit, proceeding from the Fount of Life, by a short draught of Whom we are satiated, seems to flow more abundantly among those celestial Thrones, Dominions and Powers, Angels and Archangels, rushing in the full course of the seven virtues of the Spirit. For if a river rising above its banks overflows, how much more does the Spirit, rising above every creature, when He touches the as it were low-lying fields of our minds, make glad that heavenly nature of the creatures with the larger fertility of His sanctification.

Don't let it trouble you that in one place Scripture speaks of "rivers" while in another it mentions "seven Spirits," because through the sanctification of these seven gifts of the Spirit—as Isaiah described them—the fullness of all virtue is signified: the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and strength, the Spirit of knowledge and godliness, and the Spirit of the fear of God. So there is one River, but many channels of the gifts of the Spirit. This River flows forth from the Fount of Life.

179. And let it not trouble you that either here it is said rivers, John 7:38 or elsewhere seven Spirits, Revelation 5:6 for by the sanctification of these seven gifts of the Spirit, as Isaiah said, Isaiah 11:2 is signified the fullness of all virtue; the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and strength, the Spirit of knowledge and godliness, and the Spirit of the fear of God. One, then, is the River, but many the channels of the gifts of the Spirit. This River, then, goes forth from the Fount of Life.

180. And here again, you must not let your thoughts drift to lower things just because there seems to be some difference between a fountain and a river, yet divine Scripture has arranged that the weakness of human understanding should not be harmed by the humble nature of the language. Picture any river—it springs from its fountain, but is of one nature, of one brightness and beauty. And you rightly assert that the Holy Spirit is of one ousia, brightness, and glory with the Son of God and with God the Father. I will summarize everything in the oneness of these qualities, and I will not be afraid of any question about difference of greatness. For on this point also Scripture has provided for us, for the Son of God says: "He that shall drink of the water which I will give him, it shall become in him a well of water springing up unto everlasting life." This well is clearly the grace of the Spirit, a stream proceeding from the living fountain. The Holy Spirit, then, is also the fountain of eternal life.

180. And here, again, you must not turn aside your thoughts to lower things, because there seems to be some difference between a Fount and a River, and yet the divine Scripture has provided that the weakness of human understanding should not be injured by the lowliness of the language. Set before yourself any river, it springs from its fount, but is of one nature, of one brightness and beauty. And do you assert rightly that the Holy Spirit is of one substance, brightness, and glory with the Son of God and with God the Father. I will sum up all in the oneness of the qualities, and shall not be afraid of any question as to difference of greatness. For in this point also Scripture has provided for us; for the Son of God says: He that shall drink of the water which I will give him, it shall become in him a well of water springing up unto everlasting life. John 4:14 This well is clearly the grace of the Spirit, a stream proceeding from the living Fount. The Holy Spirit, then, is also the Fount of eternal life.

You can see, then, from His words that the unity of divine greatness is pointed out, and that even heretics cannot deny that Christ is a Fount, since the Spirit is also called a Fount. And just as the Spirit is called a river, so too the Father said: "Behold, I come down upon you like a river of peace, and like a stream overflowing the glory of the Gentiles" (Isaiah 66:12). And who can doubt that the Son of God is the River of life, from whom the streams of eternal life flowed forth?

181. You observe, then, from His words that the unity of the divine greatness is pointed out, and that Christ cannot be denied to be a Fount even by heretics, since the Spirit, too, is called a Fount. And as the Spirit is called a river, so, too, the Father said: Behold, I come down upon you like a river of peace, and like a stream overflowing the glory of the Gentiles. Isaiah 66:12 And who can doubt that the Son of God is the River of life, from Whom the streams of eternal life flowed forth?

182. This water is good—it is the grace of the Spirit. Who will give this Fount to my heart? Let it spring up in me, let that which gives eternal life flow upon me. Let that Fount overflow upon us and not flow away. For Wisdom says: Drink water out of your own vessels, and from the founts of your own wells, and let your waters flow abroad in your streets. How shall I keep this water so that it does not flow out, so that it does not glide away? How shall I preserve my vessel, so that no crack of sin penetrating it should let the water of eternal life leak out? Teach us, Lord Jesus, teach us as You taught Your apostles, saying: Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon the earth, where rust and moth destroy, and where thieves break through and steal.

182. Good, then, is this water, even the grace of the Spirit. Who will give this Fount to my breast? Let it spring up in me, let that which gives eternal life flow upon me. Let that Fount overflow upon us, and not flow away. For Wisdom says: Drink water out of your own vessels, and from the founts of your own wells, and let your waters flow abroad in your streets. Proverbs 5:15-16 How shall I keep this water that it flow not forth, that it glide not away? How shall I preserve my vessel, lest any crack of sin penetrating it, should let the water of eternal life exude? Teach us, Lord Jesus, teach us as You taught Your apostles, saying: Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon the earth, where rust and moth destroy, and where thieves break through and steal. Matthew 6:19

182. For He suggests that the thief is the unclean spirit, who cannot enter those who walk in the light of good works. But if he catches anyone in the darkness of earthly desires and in the midst of enjoying earthly pleasures, he steals from them all the beauty of eternal virtue. And therefore the Lord says: Lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither rust nor moth destroy, and where thieves do not break through and steal. For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

182. For He intimates that the thief is the unclean spirit, who cannot find entrance into those who walk in the light of good works, but if he has caught any one in the darkness of earthly desires, and in the midst of the enjoyment of earthly pleasures, he spoils them of all the flower of eternal virtue. And therefore the Lord says: Lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither rust nor moth destroy, and where thieves do not break through and steal. For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

Our rust is uncontrolled passion, our rust is lust, our rust is luxury, which cloud the sharp vision of the mind with the filth of vices. Again, our moth is Arius, our moth is Photinus, who tear the holy garment of the Church with their impiety, and desiring to divide the indivisible unity of the divine power, gnaw the precious veil of faith with sacrilegious tooth. The water is spilled if Arius has left his mark, it flows away if Photinus has planted his sting in anyone's vessel. We are made of common clay, we quickly feel the effects of vices. But no one says to the potter, Why have You made me thus? For though our vessel may be common, yet one is for honor, another for dishonor. Do not then leave your pool open, do not dig it out with vices and crimes, lest anyone say: He has opened a pool and dug it, and has fallen into the pit which he made.

183. Our rust is wantonness, our rust is lust, our rust is luxury, which dim the keen vision of the mind with the filth of vices. Again, our moth is Arius, our moth is Photinus, who rend the holy vesture of the Church with their impiety, and desiring to separate the indivisible unity of the divine power, gnaw the precious veil of faith with sacrilegious tooth. The water is spilled if Arius has imprinted his tooth, it flows away if Photinus has planted his sting in any one's vessel. We are but of common clay, we quickly feel vices. But no one says to the potter, Why have You made me thus? Romans 9:20 For though our vessel be but common, yet one is in honour, another in dishonour. Romans 9:21 Do not then lay open your pool, dig not with vices and crimes, lest any one say: He has opened a pool and dug it, and is fallen into the pit which he made.

If you seek Jesus, abandon the broken cisterns, for Christ was accustomed to sit not by a pool but by a well. There the Samaritan woman found Him, the one who believed, the one who wanted to draw water. Although you should have come in the early morning, nevertheless if you come later, even at the sixth hour, you will find Jesus wearied from His journey. He is weary, but it is because of you, because He has long sought you, and your unbelief has long wearied Him. Yet He is not offended if you only come. He asks to drink, even though He is the one about to give. But He does not drink the water from a flowing stream, but rather your salvation. He drinks your good dispositions, He drinks the cup—that is, the Passion which atoned for your sins—so that by drinking His sacred blood you might quench the thirst of this world.

184. If you seek Jesus, forsake the broken cisterns, for Christ was wont to sit not by a pool but by a well. There that Samaritan woman John 4:6 found Him, she who believed, she who wished to draw water. Although you ought to have come in early morning, nevertheless if you come later, even at the sixth hour, you will find Jesus wearied with His journey. He is weary, but it is through you, because He has long sought you, your unbelief has long wearied Him. Yet He is not offended if you only come, He asks to drink Who is about to give. But He drinks not the water of a stream flowing by, but your salvation; He drinks your good dispositions, He drinks the cup, that is, the Passion which atoned for your sins, that you drinking of His sacred blood might quench the thirst of this world.

Abraham gained God after he had dug the well. Isaac, while walking by the well, received the wife who was coming to him as a type of the Church. He was faithful at the well, unfaithful at the pool. Likewise, Rebecca, as we read, found the one who sought her at the well, and the harlots washed themselves in the blood in the pool of Jezebel.

185. So Abraham gained God after he had dug the well. Genesis 21:30 So Isaac, while walking by the well, received that wife Genesis 24:62 who was coming to him as a type of the Church. Faithful he was at the well, unfaithful at the pool. Lastly, too, Rebecca, as we read, found him who sought her at the well, and the harlots washed themselves in the blood in the pool of Jezebel.


Festal Letters — Letter 64

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806064.htm>.

Opening

To Diodorus (fragment).

To Diodorus (fragment).

To my lord, son, and most beloved fellow-minister Diodorus, bishop of Tyre, Athanasius sends greetings in the Lord.

To my lord, son, and most beloved fellow-minister Diodorus [ bishop of Tyre], Athanasius greeting in the Lord.

I thank my Lord, who is establishing his teaching everywhere, and especially through his own sons, as you have clearly proven yourself to be. For even before your Reverence wrote, we already knew what great grace has been accomplished in Tyre through your perseverance. We rejoice with you that through you Tyre has also learned the right word of piety. I took an opportunity to write to you, longed-for and beloved, but I am surprised that you have not replied to my letter. Do not hesitate to write back at once, knowing that you refresh me as a son does his father, and you make me exceedingly glad as a herald of truth. Do not enter into any controversy with the heretics, but overcome their argumentativeness with silence and their ill-will with courtesy. For in this way your speech will be 'with grace, seasoned with salt Colossians 4:6,' while they will be judged by the conscience of all.

I thank my Lord, Who is everywhere establishing His doctrine, and chiefly so by means of His own sons, such as actual fact shows you to be. For before your Reverence wrote, we knew how great grace has been brought to pass in Tyre by means of your perseverance. And we rejoice with you that by your means Tyre also has learned the right word of piety. And I indeed took an opportunity of writing to you, longed-for and beloved: but I marvel at your not having replied to my letter. Be not then slow to write at once, knowing that you give me refreshment, as a son to his father, and make me exceeding glad, as a herald of truth. And enter upon no controversy with the heretics, but overcome their argumentativeness with silence, their ill-will with courtesy. For thus your speech shall be 'with grace, seasoned with salt Colossians 4:6,' while they [will be judged] by the conscience of all.


Festal Letters — Letter 63

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806063.htm>.

Opening

Letter to the Presbyter Palladius.

Letter to the Presbyter Palladius.

To our beloved son Palladius, presbyter, Bishop Athanasius sends greetings in the Lord.

To our beloved son Palladius, presbyter, Athanasius the Bishop greeting in the Lord.

I was delighted to receive your personal letter, especially because it expresses orthodox belief, just as you always do. I had already learned some time ago—not recently—the reason why you are currently staying with our beloved Innocent, and I am pleased with your devotion. Since you are doing what you are doing, please write and let me know how the brothers there are faring, and what the enemies of the truth are thinking about us. You also told me about the monks at Caesarea, and I have learned from our beloved Dianius that they are troubled and are opposing our beloved bishop Basil. I am glad you informed me, and I have pointed out to them what is proper: namely, that as children they should obey their father and not oppose what he approves. If he were suspected regarding the truth, they would be right to fight against him. But if they are confident, as all of us are, that he is a glory to the Church, contending instead on behalf of the truth and teaching those who need it, it is not right to fight against such a man, but rather to accept his good conscience with gratitude. From what the beloved Dianius has reported, they seem to be troubled without cause. For he, as I am confident, becomes weak to the weak in order to win the weak. But let our beloved friends look at the aim of his truth and at his particular purpose, and glorify the Lord who has given Cappadocia such a bishop as any region must pray to have. And you, beloved, please be so kind as to point out to them the duty of obedience, as I am writing. For this will both make them well disposed toward their father and will preserve peace in the churches. I pray that you may be well in the Lord, beloved son.

I was glad to receive also the letter written by you alone, the more so that you breathe orthodoxy in it, as is your wont. And having learned not for the first time, but long ago, the reason of your staying at present with our beloved Innocent, I am pleased with your piety. Since then you are acting as you are, write and let me know how are the brethren there, and what the enemies of the truth think about us. But whereas you have also told me of the monks at Cæsarea, and I have learned from our beloved Dianius that they are vexed, and are opposing our beloved bishop Basil, I am glad you have informed me, and I have pointed out to them what is fitting, namely that as children they should obey their father, and not oppose what he approves. For if he were suspected as touching the truth, they would do well to combat him. But if they are confident, as we all are, that he is a glory to the Church, contending rather on behalf of the truth and teaching those who require it, it is not right to combat such an one, but rather to accept with thanks his good conscience. For from what the beloved Dianius has related, they appear to be vexed without cause. For he, as I am confident, to the weak becomes weak to gain the weak. 1 Corinthians 9:22 But let our beloved friends look at the scope of his truth, and at his special purpose, and glorify the Lord Who has given such a bishop to Cappadocia as any district must pray to have. And do you, beloved, be good enough to point out to them the duty of obeying, as I write. For this is at once calculated to render them well disposed toward their father, and will preserve peace to the churches. I pray that you may be well in the Lord, beloved son.


Festal Letters — Letter 62

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806062.htm>.

Opening

To John and Antiochus.

To John and Antiochus.

Athanasius to John and Antiochus, our beloved sons and fellow presbyters in the Lord, greetings.

Athanasius to John and Antiochus, our beloved sons and fellow presbyters in the Lord, greeting.

I was happy to receive your letter just now, especially because you wrote from Jerusalem. Thank you for telling me about the brothers who gathered there, and about those who want to upset simple believers because of disputed points. But concerning these things, let the Apostle warn them not to pay attention to those who argue about words and want nothing more than to tell or hear something new. Instead, you should stand firm on your sure foundation, which is Jesus Christ our Lord and the fathers' confession concerning the faith. Avoid those who want to say anything more or less than that, and instead focus on what benefits the brothers, so they may fear God and keep His commandments. In this way, both through the teaching of the fathers and through keeping the commandments, they will be able to appear pleasing to the Lord on the day of judgment. But I have been completely astonished at the boldness of those who dare to speak against our beloved Basil the bishop, a true servant of God. For their empty talk proves that they do not even love the confession of the fathers.

I was glad to receive your letter just now, the more so as you wrote from Jerusalem. I thank you for informing me about the brethren that there assembled, and about those who wish, on account of disputed points, to disturb the simple. But about these things let the Apostle charge them not to give heed to those who contend about words, and seek nothing else than to tell and hear some new thing. But do you, having your foundation sure, even Jesus Christ our Lord, and the confession of the fathers concerning the faith, avoid those who wish to say anything more or less than that, and rather aim at the profit of the brethren, that they may fear God and keep His commandments, in order that both by the teaching of the fathers, and by the keeping of the commandments, they may be able to appear well-pleasing to the Lord in the day of judgment. But I have been utterly astonished at the boldness of those who venture to speak against our beloved Basil the bishop, a true servant of God. For from such vain talk they can be convicted of not loving even the confession of the fathers.

Greet the brethren. Those who are with me greet you. I pray that you may be well in the Lord, beloved and much-desired sons.

Greet the brethren. They that are with me greet you. I pray that you may be well in the Lord, beloved and much-desired sons.


Festal Letters — Letter 61

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806061.htm>.

Opening

Letter to Maximus. (Written about 371 A.D.)

Letter to Maximus. (Written about 371 a.d.)

To our beloved son Maximus, the philosopher, for whom we truly long, Athanasius sends greetings in the Lord.

To our beloved and most truly longed-for son, Maximus, philosopher, Athanasius greeting in the Lord.

After reading your letter, I approve of your piety. However, I am amazed at the recklessness of those 'who understand neither what they say nor whereof they confidently affirm,' and I had truly decided to say nothing. For to respond to matters that are so obvious and clearer than light is simply to give an opportunity for shamelessness to such lawless people. We learned this from the Savior. When Pilate washed his hands and went along with the false accusation of the Jews of that time, the Lord answered him no more. Instead, He warned Pilate's wife in a dream, so that the one being judged might be believed to be God not merely in word, but in power. And after giving Caiaphas no reply to his foolishness, He Himself brought everyone to knowledge through His promise. Therefore I delayed for some time, and I have reluctantly given in to your enthusiasm for the truth, considering the argumentativeness of people without shame. I have written nothing beyond what your letter contains, so that the opponent may from now on be convinced regarding the points he has objected to, and may 'keep his tongue from evil and his lips that they speak no guile.' I wish they would no longer join with the Jews who passed by long ago, mocking Him who hung upon the Tree: 'If you be the Son of God save Yourself.' But even if they will not yield after this, remember the apostolic instruction and 'a man that is heretical after a first and second admonition refuse, knowing that such an one is perverted and sins being self-condemned.' For if they are Gentiles or Judaizers who are acting so boldly, let them, as Jews, consider the Cross of Christ a stumbling-block, or as Gentiles, foolishness. But if they claim to be Christians, let them learn that the crucified Christ is at once Lord of Glory, and the Power of God and Wisdom of God.

Having read the letter now come from you, I approve your piety: but, marvelling at the rashness of those 'who understand neither what they say nor whereof they confidently affirm 1 Timothy 1:7,' I had really decided to say nothing. For to reply upon matters which are so plain and which are clearer than light, is simply to give an excuse for shamelessness to such lawless men. And this we have learned from the Saviour. For when Pilate had washed his hands, and acquiesced in the false accusation of the Jews of that day, the Lord answered him no more, but rather warned his wife in a dream, so that He that was being judged might be believed to be God not in word, but in power. While after vouchsafing Caiaphas no reply to his folly, He Himself by his promise brought all over to knowledge. Accordingly for some time I delayed, and have reluctantly yielded to your zeal for the truth, in view of the argumentativeness of men without shame. And I have dictated nothing beyond what your letter contains, in order that the adversary may from henceforth be convinced on the points to which he has objected, and may 'keep his tongue from evil and his lips that they speak no guile.' And would that they would no longer join the Jews who passed by of old in reproaching Him that hung upon the Tree: 'If you be the Son of God save Yourself Matthew 27:40; Luke 28:37.' But if even after this they will not give in, yet do you remember the apostolic injunction, and 'a man that is heretical after a first and second admonition refuse, knowing that such an one is perverted and sins being self-condemned Titus 3:10-11.' For if they are Gentiles, or of the Judaisers, who are thus daring, let them, as Jews, think the Cross of Christ a stumbling-block, or as Gentiles, foolishness. 1 Corinthians 1:23 But if they pretend to be Christians let them learn that the crucified Christ is at once Lord of Glory, and the Power of God and Wisdom of God.

But if they doubt whether He is God at all, let them reverence Thomas, who touched the Crucified and called Him Lord and God. Or let them fear the Lord Himself, who said after washing the disciples' feet: "You call Me Lord and Master, and you say well, for so I am." But in the same body in which He was when He washed their feet, He also carried up our sins to the Tree. And He was witnessed to as Master of Creation, in that the Sun withdrew its beams and the earth trembled and the rocks were split, and the executioners recognized that the Crucified was truly Son of God. For the Body they saw was not that of some man, but of God, being in which, even when being crucified, He raised the dead. Accordingly it is no good venture of theirs to say that the Word of God came into a certain holy man; for this was true of each of the prophets and of the other saints, and on that assumption He would clearly be born and die in the case of each one of them. But this is not so, far be the thought. But once for all "at the consummation of the ages, to put away sin" "the Word was made flesh" and proceeded forth from Mary the Virgin, Man after our likeness, as also He said to the Jews, "Why do you seek to kill Me, a man that has told you the truth?" And we are deified not by partaking of the body of some man, but by receiving the Body of the Word Himself.

2. But if they are in doubt whether He is God at all, let them reverence Thomas, who handled the Crucified and pronounced Him Lord and God. John 20:28 Or let them fear the Lord Himself, who said, after washing the feet of the disciples: 'You call Me Lord and Master, and you say well, for so I am.' But in the same body in which He was when he washed their feet, He also carried up our sins to the Tree. 1 Peter 2:24 And He was witnessed to as Master of Creation, in that the Sun withdrew his beams and the earth trembled and the rocks were rent, and the executioners recognised that the Crucified was truly Son of God. For the Body they beheld was not that of some man, but of God, being in which, even when being crucified, He raised the dead. Accordingly it is no good venture of theirs to say that the Word of God came into a certain holy man; for this was true of each of the prophets and of the other saints, and on that assumption He would clearly be born and die in the case of each one of them. But this is not so, far be the thought. But once for all 'at the consummation of the ages Hebrews 9:26, to put away sin ' 'the Word was made flesh John 1:14 ' and proceeded forth from Mary the Virgin, Man after our likeness, as also He said to the Jews, 'Wherefore do you seek to kill Me, a man that has told you the truth?' And we are deified not by partaking of the body of some man, but by receiving the Body of the Word Himself.

And at this I am also very surprised—how they have dared to entertain such an idea that the Word became man as a consequence of His nature. For if this were so, remembering Mary would be pointless. For nature does not know of a virgin bearing a child apart from a man. Therefore, by the good pleasure of the Father, being true God and the Word and Wisdom of the Father by nature, He became man in the body for our salvation, so that having something to offer for us He might save us all, "as many as through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage." For it was not some mere man who gave himself up for us, since every man is under sentence of death, according to what was said to all in Adam: "earth you are and to earth you shall return." Nor was it any other creature, since every creature is subject to change. But the Word Himself offered His own body on our behalf, so that our faith and hope might not be in man, but that we might have our faith in God the Word Himself. Why, even now that He has become man we behold His glory, "glory as of the only-begotten of His Father—full of grace and truth." For what He endured by means of the body, He displayed as God in its greatness. And while He hungered in the flesh, as God He fed the hungry. And if anyone is offended because of the bodily conditions, let him believe because of what God accomplishes. For as a human He asks where Lazarus is laid, but raises him up divinely. Let no one then mock, calling Him a child and citing His age, His growth, His eating, drinking, and suffering, lest while denying what is proper to the body, he deny completely also His presence among us. And just as He did not become man as a consequence of His nature, likewise it was fitting that when He had taken a body He should display what was proper to it, lest the false teaching of Manichaeus should prevail. Again it was fitting that when He went about in the body, He should not hide what belonged to the Godhead, lest he of Samosata should find an excuse to call Him man, as distinct in prosopon from God the Word.

3. And at this also I am much surprised, how they have ventured to entertain such an idea as that the Word became man in consequence of His Nature. For if this were so, the commemoration of Mary would be superfluous. For neither does Nature know of a Virgin bearing apart from a man. Whence by the good pleasure of the Father, being true God, and Word and Wisdom of the Father by nature, He became man in the body for our salvation, in order that having somewhat to offer for us He might save us all, 'as many as through fear of death were all their life-time subject to bondage.' For it was not some man that gave Himself up for us; since every man is under sentence of death, according to what was said to all in Adam, 'earth you are and unto earth you shall return.' Nor yet was it any other of the creatures, since every creature is liable to change. But the Word Himself offered His own Body on our behalf that our faith and hope might not be in man, but that we might have our faith in God the Word Himself. Why, even now that He has become man we behold His Glory, ' glory as of one only-begotten of His Father — full of grace and truth.' For what He endured by means of the Body, He magnified as God. And while He hungered in the flesh, as God He fed the hungry. And if anyone is offended by reason of the bodily conditions, let him believe by reason of what God works. For humanly He enquires where Lazarus is laid, but raises him up divinely. Let none then laugh, calling Him a child, and citing His age, His growth, His eating, drinking and suffering, lest while denying what is proper for the body, he deny utterly also His sojourn among us. And just as He has not become Man in consequence of His nature, in like manner it was consistent that when He had taken a body He should exhibit what was proper to it, lest the imaginary theory of Manichæus should prevail. Again it was consistent that when He went about in the body, He should not hide what belonged to the Godhead, lest he of Samosata should find an excuse to call Him man, as distinct in person from God the Word.

Let the unbelievers recognize this and learn that while He lay as an infant in a manger, He made the Magi subject to Him and they worshiped Him. While He came down to Egypt as a child, He destroyed the handmade objects of its idolatry. And when crucified in the flesh, He raised the dead who had long since turned to decay. It has been made clear to everyone that He underwent all these things not for His own sake but for ours, so that through His sufferings we might put on freedom from suffering and incorruption 1 Corinthians 15:53, and remain alive eternally.

4. Let then the unbelievers perceive this, and learn that while as a Babe He lay in a manger, He subjected the Magi and was worshipped by them; and while as a Child He came down to Egypt, He brought to nought the hand-made objects of its idolatry: and crucified in the flesh, He raised the dead long since turned to corruption. And it has been made plain to all that not for His own sake but for ours He underwent all things, that we by His sufferings might put on freedom from suffering and incorruption 1 Corinthians 15:53, and abide unto life eternal.

I have briefly written this, following, as I said earlier, the outline of your own letter, without elaborating any point further but only mentioning what concerns the Holy Cross so that those who despise it may be taught better concerning the points where they took offense, and may worship the Crucified. But you should thoroughly persuade the unbelievers; perhaps somehow they may move from ignorance to knowledge and believe rightly. And even though what your own letter contains is sufficient, it is still good to have added what I have as a reminder in view of argumentative people—not so much so that being refuted in their bold assertions they may be put to shame, as so that being reminded they may not forget the truth. For let what was confessed by the Fathers at Nicaea stand firm. For it is correct and sufficient to overthrow every heresy however impious, and especially that of the Arians, which speaks against the Word of God and as a logical consequence profanes His Holy Spirit. Greet all who hold to the right teaching. All who are with us greet you.

5. This then I have concisely dictated, following, as I said above, the lines of your own letter, without working out any point any further but only mentioning what relates to the Holy Cross in order that the despisers may be taught better upon the points where they were offended, and may worship the Crucified. But do you thoroughly persuade the unbelievers; perhaps somehow they may come from ignorance to knowledge, and believe aright. And even though what your own letter contains is sufficient, yet it is as well to have added what I have for the sake of reminder in view of contentious persons; not so much in order that being refuted in their venturesome statements they may be put to shame, as that being reminded they may not forget the truth. For let what was confessed by the Fathers at Nicæa prevail. For it is correct, and enough to overthrow every heresy however impious, and especially that of the Arians which speaks against the Word of God, and as a logical consequence profanes His Holy Spirit. Greet all who hold aright. All that are with us greet you.


Festal Letters — Letter 60

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806060.htm>.

Opening

To Adelphius, Bishop and Confessor: against the Arians.

To Adelphius, Bishop and Confessor: against the Arians.

We have read what you have written to us in your devotion, and we genuinely approve of your piety toward Christ. Above all, we glorify God, who has given you such grace that you not only hold right opinions but also, as much as is possible, are not ignorant of the devil's schemes. But we are amazed at the perversity of the heretics, seeing that they have fallen into such a pit of impiety that they no longer retain even their senses, but have their understanding corrupted on all sides. This attempt is a plot of the devil and an imitation of the disobedient Jews. For just as the Jews, when refuted on all sides, kept devising excuses to their own harm if only they could deny the Lord and bring upon themselves what was prophesied against them, so these men, seeing themselves condemned on all sides and perceiving that their heresy has become abominable to everyone, prove themselves 'inventors of evil things,' so that by not ceasing their attacks against the truth, they may remain consistent and genuine adversaries of Christ. For where has this new evil of theirs come from? How have they even dared to utter this new blasphemy against the Savior? But the impious man, it seems, is a worthless object and truly 'reprobate concerning the Faith.' For formerly, while denying the Godhead of the only-begotten Son of God, they at least pretended to acknowledge His coming in the flesh. But now, gradually going from bad to worse, they have fallen from this opinion of theirs and become godless on all sides, so as neither to acknowledge Him as God nor to believe that He has become man. For if they believed this, they would not have uttered such things as you have reported against them in your devotion.

We have read what your piety has written to us, and genuinely approve your piety toward Christ. And above all we glorify God, Who has given you such grace as not only to have right opinions, but also, so far as that is possible, not to be ignorant of the devices 2 Corinthians 2:11 of the devil. But we marvel at the perversity of the heretics, seeing that they have fallen into such a pit of impiety that they no longer retain even their senses, but have their understanding corrupted on all sides. But this attempt is a plot of the devil, and an imitation of the disobedient Jews. For as the latter, when refuted on all sides, kept devising excuses to their own hurt, if only they could deny the Lord and bring upon themselves what was prophesied against them, in like manner these men, seeing themselves proscribed on all hands, and perceiving that their heresy has become abominable to all, prove themselves 'inventors of evil things Romans 1:30,' in order that, not ceasing their fightings against the truth, they may remain consistent and genuine adversaries of Christ. For whence has this new mischief of theirs sprung forth? How have they even ventured to utter this new blasphemy against the Saviour? But the impious man, it seems, is a worthless object, and truly 'reprobate concerning the Faith 2 Timothy 3:8.' For formerly, while denying the Godhead of the only-begotten Son of God, they pretended at any rate to acknowledge His coming in the Flesh. But now, gradually going from bad to worse, they have fallen from this opinion of theirs, and become Godless on all hands, so as neither to acknowledge Him as God, nor to believe that He has become man. For if they believed this they would not have uttered such things as your piety has reported against them.

You, beloved and most truly longed-for, have done what befits the tradition of the Church and your piety toward the Lord by refuting, admonishing, and rebuking such men. But since, instigated by their father the devil, "they knew not nor understood," as it is written, "but go on still in darkness," let them learn from your piety that this error of theirs belongs to Valentinus and Marcion, and to Mani, of whom some substituted the idea of Appearance for Reality, while the others, dividing what is indivisible, denied the truth that "the Word was made Flesh, and dwelt among us." Why then, since they agree with those people, do they not also take up the inheritance of their names? For it is reasonable, since they hold their error, to have their names as well, and in the future to be called Valentinians, Marcionists, and Manicheans. Perhaps even then, being put to shame by the bad reputation of the names, they may be enabled to perceive into what a depth of impiety they have fallen. And it would be within our rights not to answer them at all, according to the apostolic advice: "A man that is heretical, after a first and second admonition refuse, knowing that such a one is perverted, and sins, being self-condemned"—the more so, since the Prophet says about such men: "The fool shall utter foolishness, and his heart shall imagine vain things." But since, like their leader, they too go about like lions seeking whom among the simple they shall devour, we are compelled to write in reply to your piety, so that the brethren being once again instructed by your admonition may still further reject the vain teaching of those men.

2. You, however, beloved and most truly longed-for, have done what befitted the tradition of the Church and your piety toward the Lord, in refuting, admonishing, and rebuking such men. But since, instigated by their father the devil, 'they knew not nor understood,' as it is written, 'but go on still in darkness,' let them learn from your piety that this error of theirs belongs to Valentinus and Marcion, and to Manichæus, of whom some substituted [the idea of] Appearance for Reality, while the others, dividing what is indivisible, denied the truth that 'the Word was made Flesh, and dwelt among us John 1:14.' Why then, as they hold with those people, do they not also take up the heritage of their names? For it is reasonable, as they hold their error, to have their names as well, and for the future to be called Valentinians, Marcionists, and Manichæans. Perhaps even thus, being put to shame by the ill savour of the names, they may be enabled to perceive into what a depth of impiety they have fallen. And it would be within our rights not to answer them at all, according to the apostolic advice Titus 3:10-11: 'A man that is heretical, after a first and second admonition refuse, knowing that such an one is perverted, and sins, being self-condemned;' the more so, in that the Prophet says about such men: 'The fool shall utter foolishness, and his heart shall imagine vain things.' But since, like their leader, they too go about like lions seeking whom among the simple they shall devour 1 Peter 5:8, we are compelled to write in reply to your piety, that the brethren being once again instructed by your admonition may still further reprobate the vain teaching of those men.

We do not worship a creature. Never! That mistake belongs to pagans and Arians. Instead, we worship the Lord of Creation, the Word of God made flesh. Even though the flesh is itself part of the created world, it has become God's body. We do not separate the body from the Word and worship it by itself, nor do we push the flesh aside when we want to worship the Word. Rather, knowing as we said before that "the Word was made flesh," we recognize him as God even after he came in the flesh. Who could be foolish enough to say to the Lord, "Leave the body so I may worship you"? Or who could be impious enough to join the senseless Jews in saying, because of the body, "Why do you, being a man, make yourself God"? But the leper was not like this. He worshiped God in the body and recognized that he was God, saying, "Lord, if you will you can make me clean." He did not think the Word of God was a creature because of the flesh, nor did he reject the flesh the Word had taken on because the Word was the maker of all creation. Instead, he worshiped the Creator of the universe as dwelling in a created temple, and was cleansed. Likewise, the woman with the flow of blood believed and simply touched the hem of his garment and was healed, and the sea with its foaming waves heard the incarnate Word and stopped its storm, while the man blind from birth was healed by the fleshly spitting of the Word. And what is greater and more startling—since this perhaps offended those most impious men—even when the Lord was hanging on the actual cross (for it was his body and the Word was in it), the sun was darkened and the earth shook, the rocks split, the temple veil tore, and many bodies of the saints who had died were raised.

3. We do not worship a creature. Far be the thought. For such an error belongs to heathens and Arians. But we worship the Lord of Creation, Incarnate, the Word of God. For if the flesh also is in itself a part of the created world, yet it has become God's body. And we neither divide the body, being such, from the Word, and worship it by itself, nor when we wish to worship the Word do we set Him far apart from the Flesh, but knowing, as we said above, that 'the Word was made flesh,' we recognise Him as God also, after having come in the flesh. Who, accordingly, is so senseless as to say to the Lord: 'Leave the Body that I may worship You;' or so impious as to join the senseless Jews in saying, on account of the Body, 'Why do You, being a man, make Yourself God John 10:33?' But the leper was not one of this sort, for he worshipped God in the Body, and recognised that He was God, saying, 'Lord, if You will You can make me clean Matthew 8:2.' Neither by reason of the Flesh did he think the Word of God a creature: nor because the Word was the maker of all creation did he despise the Flesh which He had put on. But he worshipped the Creator of the universe as dwelling in a created temple, and was cleansed. So also the woman with an issue of blood, who believed, and only touched the hem of His garment, was healed Matthew 9:20, and the sea with its foaming waves heard the incarnate Word, and ceased its storm, while the man blind from birth was healed by the fleshly spitting of the Word. John 9:6 And, what is greater and more startling (for perhaps this even offended those most impious men), even when the Lord was hanging upon the actual cross (for it was His Body and the Word was in it), the sun was darkened and the earth shook, the rocks were rent, and the veil of the temple rent, and many bodies of the saints which slept arose.

These things happened, and no one doubted—as the Arians now dare to doubt—whether one should believe in the incarnate Word. On the contrary, even from seeing the man, they recognized that he was their maker, and when they heard a human voice, they did not say, because it was human, that the Word was a creature. Instead, they trembled and recognized nothing less than that it was being uttered from a holy temple. How then can the impious fail to fear lest, as they refused to have God in their knowledge, they may be given up to a reprobate mind to do those things which are not fitting? For creation does not worship a creature. Nor again did she, on account of his flesh, refuse to worship her Lord. Rather, she beheld her maker in the body, and in the name of Jesus every knee bowed—yes, and shall bow—of things in heaven and things on earth and things under the earth, and every tongue shall confess, whether the Arians approve or not, that Jesus is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. For the flesh did not diminish the glory of the Word—far be the thought. On the contrary, it was glorified by him. Nor, because the Son who was in the form of God took upon him the form of a servant, was he deprived of his Godhead. On the contrary, he has thus become the deliverer of all flesh and of all creation. And if God sent his Son, brought forth from a woman, the fact causes us no shame but rather glory and great grace. For he has become man that he might deify us in himself, and he has been born of a woman and begotten of a virgin in order to transfer to himself our erring generation, and that we may become henceforth a holy race and partakers of the divine nature, as blessed Peter wrote. And what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.

4. These things then happened, and no one doubted, as the Arians now venture to doubt, whether one is to believe the incarnate Word; but even from beholding the man, they recognised that He was their maker, and when they heard a human voice, they did not, because it was human, say that the Word was a creature. On the contrary, they trembled, and recognised nothing less than that it was being uttered from a holy Temple. How then can the impious fail to fear lest 'as they refused to have God in their knowledge, they may be given up to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting Romans 1:28?' For Creation does not worship a creature. Nor again did she on account of His Flesh refuse to worship her Lord. But she beheld her maker in the Body, and 'in the Name of Jesus every knee' bowed, yea and 'shall bow, of things in heaven and things on earth and things under the earth, and every tongue shall confess,' whether the Arians approve or no, 'that Jesus is Lord, to the Glory of God the Father Philippians 2:10-11.' For the Flesh did not diminish the glory of the Word; far be the thought: on the contrary, it was glorified by Him. Nor, because the Son that was in the form of God took upon Him the form of a servant was He deprived of His Godhead. On the contrary, He is thus become the Deliverer of all flesh and of all creation. And if God sent His Son brought forth from a woman, the fact causes us no shame but contrariwise glory and great grace. For He has become Man, that He might deify us in Himself, and He has been born of a woman, and begotten of a Virgin, in order to transfer to Himself our erring generation, and that we may become henceforth a holy race, and 'partakers of the Divine Nature,' as blessed Peter wrote. 2 Peter 1:4 And 'what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh Romans 8:3.'

Since the Word took on flesh to deliver all people, raise everyone from the dead, and provide redemption for sins, those who dismiss the flesh—as well as those who use it as grounds to claim the Son of God is a created or made thing—must surely appear ungrateful and deserve complete hatred. For they are practically crying out to God: "Don't send Your Only-begotten Son in the flesh; don't have Him take flesh from a virgin, or else He will redeem us from death and sin. We don't want Him to come in a body, or else He will undergo death on our behalf. We don't want the Word to be made flesh, or else in it He will become our Mediator to give us access to You, and we will end up living in the heavenly mansions. Keep the gates of heaven shut so that Your Word won't consecrate for us the road there through the veil, that is, His flesh." These are the statements they express with diabolical boldness through the error they have invented. For those who refuse to worship the Word made flesh are ungrateful for His becoming human. And those who separate the Word from the flesh do not accept that one redemption from sin has occurred, or one destruction of death. But where will these impious people find the flesh that the Savior took apart from Him, that they would even dare to say, "We don't worship the Lord with the flesh, but we separate the body and worship Him alone"? Why, the blessed Stephen saw in the heavens the Lord standing at God's right hand, while the angels told the disciples, "He will come in the same way as you saw Him going into heaven," and the Lord Himself says, addressing the Father, "I desire that where I am, they also may be with Me." And surely if the flesh is inseparable from the Word, doesn't it follow that these people must either abandon their error and in the future worship the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, or, if they refuse to worship or serve the Word who came in the flesh, be cast out completely and no longer be counted as Christians but instead as either pagans or among the Jews.

5. Seeing then that Flesh was taken by the Word to deliver all men, raise all from the dead, and make redemption for sins, must not they appear ungrateful, and be worthy of all hatred, who make light of the Flesh, as well as those who on account of it charge the Son of God with being a thing created or made? For they as good as cry to God and say: 'Send not Your Only-begotten Son in the Flesh, cause Him not to take flesh of a virgin, lest He redeem us from death and sin. We do not wish Him to come in the body, lest He should undergo death on our behalf: we do not desire the Word to be made flesh, lest in it He should become our Mediator to gain access to you, and we so inhabit the heavenly mansions. Let the gates of the heavens be shut lest Your Word consecrate for us the road there through the veil, namely His Flesh Hebrews 10:20.' These are their utterances, vented with diabolical daring, by the error they have devised. For they who do not wish to worship the Word made flesh, are ungrateful for His becoming man. And they who divide the Word from the Flesh do not hold that one redemption from sin has taken place, or one destruction of death. But where at all will these impious men find the Flesh which the Saviour took, apart from Him, that they should even venture to say 'we do not worship the Lord with the Flesh, but we separate the Body, and worship Him alone.' Why, the blessed Stephen saw in the heavens the Lord standing on [God's] right hand Acts 7:55, while the Angels said to the disciples, 'He shall so come in like manner as you beheld Him going into heaven:' and the Lord Himself says, addressing the Father, 'I will that where I am, they also may be with Me John 17:24.' And surely if the Flesh is inseparable from the Word, does it not follow that these men must either lay aside their error, and for the future worship the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, or, if they do not worship or serve the Word Who came in the Flesh, be cast out on all sides, and count no longer as Christians but either as heathens, or among the Jews.

Such then, as we have described above, is the madness and recklessness of those people. But our faith is right and begins with the teaching of the apostles and the tradition of the fathers, being confirmed by both the New Testament and the Old. For the prophets say, "Send out Your Word and Your Truth," and "Behold the Virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which means God with us." But what does that mean, if not that God has come in the Flesh? Meanwhile the apostolic tradition teaches in the words of blessed Peter, "Since Christ suffered for us in the Flesh," and in what Paul writes, "Looking for the blessed hope and appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, who gave Himself for us that He might redeem us from all lawlessness, and purify for Himself a people for His own possession, zealous for good works." How then has He given Himself, if He had not taken on flesh? For He offered flesh and gave Himself for us, so that by undergoing death in it, "He might destroy him who had the power of death, that is, the devil." Therefore we always give thanks in the name of Jesus Christ, and we do not disregard the grace that came to us through Him. For the coming of the Savior in the flesh has been the ransom and salvation of all creation. So then, beloved and most longed-for, let what I have said remind those who love the Lord, while as for those who have imitated the behavior of Judas and deserted the Lord to join Caiaphas, let them be taught better by these things, if perhaps they are willing, if perhaps they are ashamed. And let them know that in worshiping the Lord in the flesh we do not worship a creature, but, as we said above, the Creator who has taken on the created body.

6. Such then, as we have above described, is the madness and daring of those men. But our faith is right, and starts from the teaching of the Apostles and tradition of the fathers, being confirmed both by the New Testament and the Old. For the Prophets say: 'Send out Your Word and Your Truth,' and 'Behold the Virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which is being interpreted God with us.' But what does that mean, if not that God has come in the Flesh? While the Apostolic tradition teaches in the words of blessed Peter, 'Forasmuch then as Christ suffered for us in the Flesh;' and in what Paul writes, 'Looking for the blessed hope and appearing of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ, Who gave Himself for us that He might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto Himself a people for His own possession, and zealous of good works Titus 2:13-14.' How then has He given Himself, if He had not worn flesh? For flesh He offered, and gave Himself for us, in order that undergoing death in it, 'He might bring to nought him that had the power of death, that is, the devil Hebrews 2:14.' Hence also we always give thanks in the name of Jesus Christ, and we do not set at nought the grace which came to us through Him. For the coming of the Saviour in the flesh has been the ransom and salvation of all creation. So then, beloved and most longed-for, let what I have said put in mind those who love the Lord, while as to those who have imitated the behaviour of Judas, and deserted the Lord to join Caiaphas, let them by these things be taught better, if maybe they are willing, if maybe they are ashamed. And let them know that in worshipping the Lord in the flesh we do not worship a creature, but, as we said above, the Creator Who has put on the created body.

We would like your piety to ask them this. When Israel was ordered to go up to Jerusalem to worship at the temple of the Lord, where the ark was located, "and above it the Cherubim of glory overshadowing the Mercy-seat" (Hebrews 9:5), did they do well or the opposite? If they did wrong, how is it that those who despised this law were subject to punishment? For it is written that if a man treats it lightly and does not go up, he shall perish from among the people. But if they did well, and in this proved pleasing to God, are not the Arians—abominable and most shameful of any heresy—many times worthy of destruction, in that while they approve of the former people for the honor they paid to the Temple, they will not worship the Lord who is in the flesh as in a temple? And yet the former temple was constructed of stones and gold, as a shadow. But when the reality came, the type ceased from that point on, and there did not remain, according to the Lord's utterance, one stone upon another that was not broken down (Matthew 24:2). And they did not, when they saw the temple of stones, suppose that the Lord who spoke in the temple was a creature; nor did they treat the Temple with contempt and withdraw far away to worship. But they came to it according to the Law, and worshipped the God who uttered His oracles from the Temple. Since this was so, how can it be anything other than right to worship the Body of the Lord, all-holy and all-reverend as it is, announced as it was by the archangel Gabriel, formed by the Holy Spirit, and made the Vesture of the Word? It was in any case a bodily hand that the Word stretched out to raise her who was sick of a fever (Mark 1:31); a human voice that He uttered to raise Lazarus from the dead (John 11:43); and, once again, stretching out His hands upon the Cross, He overthrew the prince of the power of the air, that now works in the sons of disobedience, and made the way clear for us into the heavens.

7. But we should like your piety to ask them this. When Israel was ordered to go up to Jerusalem to worship at the temple of the Lord, where was the ark, 'and above it the Cherubim of glory overshadowing the Mercy-seat Hebrews 9:5,' did they do well or the opposite? If they did ill, how came it that they who despised this law were liable to punishment? For it is written that if a man make light of it and go not up, he shall perish from among the people. But if they did well, and in this proved well-pleasing to God, are not the Arians, abominable and most shameful of any heresy, many times worthy of destruction, in that while they approve the former People for the honour paid by them to the Temple, they will not worship the Lord Who is in the flesh as in a temple? And yet the former temple was constructed of stones and gold, as a shadow. But when the reality came, the type ceased from thenceforth, and there did not remain, according to the Lord's utterance, one stone upon another that was not broken down. Matthew 24:2 And they did not, when they saw the temple of stones, suppose that the Lord who spoke in the temple was a creature; nor did they set the Temple at nought and retire far off to worship. But they came to it according to the Law, and worshipped the God who uttered His oracles from the Temple. Since then this was so, how can it be other than right to worship the Body of the Lord, all- holy and all-reverend as it is, announced as it was by the archangel Gabriel, formed by the Holy Spirit, and made the Vesture of the Word? It was at any rate a bodily hand that the Word stretched out to raise her that was sick of a fever Mark 1:31: a human voice that He uttered to raise Lazarus from the dead John 11:43; and, once again, stretching out His hands upon the Cross, He overthrew the prince of the power of the air, that now works in the sons of disobedience, and made the way clear for us into the heavens.

8. Therefore, whoever dishonors the Temple dishonors the Lord in the Temple. And whoever separates the Word from the Body nullifies the grace given to us in Him. The most impious Arian madmen should not suppose that because the Body is created, the Word is also a creature. Nor should they, because the Word is not a creature, disparage His Body. Their error is truly astonishing, for they confuse and disturb everything at once, devising pretexts only to number the Creator among the creatures.

8. Therefore he that dishonours the Temple dishonours the Lord in the Temple; and he that separates the Word from the Body sets at nought the grace given to us in Him. And let not the most impious Arian madmen suppose that, since the Body is created, the Word also is a creature, nor let them, because the Word is not a creature, disparage His Body. For their error is matter for wonder, in that they at once confuse and disturb everything, and devise pretexts only in order to number the Creator among the creatures.

But let them listen. If the Word were a creature, He would not have taken on a created body to give it life. For what help can creatures receive from a creature that itself needs salvation? But since the Word is Creator and has Himself made the creatures, therefore also at the end of the ages He took on the creature, so that He as creator might consecrate it anew and be able to restore it. But a creature could never be saved by a creature, any more than the creatures were created by a creature, if the Word was not creator. Accordingly, let them not lie against the divine Scriptures or cause simple believers to stumble; but if they are willing, let them change their minds in turn and no longer worship the creature instead of God, who made all things. But if they wish to persist in their impieties, let them alone fill themselves with them, and let them gnash their teeth like their father the devil, because the Faith of the Catholic Church knows that the Word of God is creator and maker of all things; and we know that while "in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God," now that He has also become man for our salvation we worship Him, not as though He had come in the body making Himself equal with it, but as Master, taking on the form of the servant, and Maker and Creator coming in a creature in order that, in it delivering all things, He might bring the world near to the Father and make all things to be at peace, things in heaven and things on the earth. For in this way we also recognize His Godhead, even the Father's, and worship His Incarnate Presence, even if the Arian madmen burst themselves apart.

But let them listen. If the Word were a creature, He would not assume the created body to quicken it. For what help can creatures derive from a creature that itself needs salvation? But since the Word being Creator has Himself made the creatures, therefore also at the consummation of the ages Hebrews 9:26 He put on the creature, that He as creator might once more consecrate it, and be able to recover it. But a creature could never be saved by a creature, any more than the creatures were created by a creature, if the Word was not creator. Accordingly let them not lie against the divine Scriptures nor give offense to simple brethren; but if they are willing let them change their mind in their turn, and no longer worship the creature instead of God, Who made all things. But if they wish to abide by their impieties, let them alone take their fill of them, and let them gnash their teeth like their father the devil, because the Faith of the Catholic Church knows that the Word of God is creator and maker of all things; and we know that while 'in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God John 1:1,' now that He has become also man for our salvation we worship Him, not as though He had come in the body equalising Himself with it, but as Master, assuming the form of the servant, and Maker and Creator coming in a creature in order that, in it delivering all things, He might bring the world near to the Father, and make all things to be at peace, things in heaven and things on the earth. For thus also we recognise His Godhead, even the Father's, and worship His Incarnate Presence, even if the Arian madmen burst themselves in sunder.

Greet all who love the Lord Jesus Christ. We pray that you may be well and remember us to the Lord, beloved and truly most longed-for. If necessary, this should be read to Hieracas the presbyter.

Greet all that love the Lord Jesus Christ. We pray that you may be well, and remember us to the Lord, beloved and truly most longed-for. If need be this is to be read to Hieracas the presbyter.


Festal Letters — Letter 59

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806059.htm>.

Opening

To Epictetus.

To Epictetus.

To my Lord, beloved brother, and most-longed-for fellow-minister Epictetus, Athanasius greeting in the Lord. I thought that all the empty arguments of all heretics, however many they may be, had been silenced by the Synod held at Nicaea. For the Faith confessed there by the Fathers according to the divine Scriptures is sufficient by itself both to overthrow all impiety and to establish true religious belief in Christ. For this reason at the present time, when various synods assembled in Gaul and Spain and great Rome, all who came together, as though moved by one spirit, unanimously anathematized those who were still secretly holding to Arius, namely Auxentius of Milan, Ursacius, Valens, and Gaius of Pannonia. And they wrote everywhere that, whereas the above-mentioned men were using the names of synods to support their side, no synod should be cited in the Catholic Church except the one held at Nicaea, which stands as a monument of victory over all heresy, but especially the Arian, which was the main reason the synod assembled when it did. How then, after all this, are some people trying to raise doubts or questions? If they belong to the Arians, it is not surprising that they find fault with what was written against themselves, just as the pagans when they hear that "the idols of the heathen are silver and gold, the work of men's hands," think the doctrine of the divine Cross is foolishness. But if those who want to reopen everything by raising questions belong to those who think they believe rightly and love what the fathers have declared, they are simply doing what the prophet describes: giving their neighbor turbid confusion to drink and fighting about words to no good purpose, except to undermine the simple.

To my Lord, beloved brother, and most-longed-for fellow-minister Epictetus, Athanasius greeting in the Lord. I thought that all vain talk of all heretics, many as they may be, had been stopped by the Synod which was held at Nicæa. For the Faith there confessed by the Fathers according to the divine Scriptures is enough by itself at once to overthrow all impiety, and to establish the religious belief in Christ. For this reason at the present time, at the assembling of diverse synods, both in Gaul and Spain, and great Rome, all who came together, as though moved by one spirit, unanimously anathematised those who still were secretly holding with Arius, namely Auxentius of Milan, Ursacius, Valens, and Gaius of Pannonia. And they wrote everywhere, that, whereas the above-said were devising the names of synods to cite on their side, no synod should be cited in the Catholic Church save only that which was held at Nicæa, which was a monument of victory over all heresy, but especially the Arian, which was the main reason of the synod assembling when it did. How then, after all this, are some attempting to raise doubts or questions? If they belong to the Arians, this is not to be wondered at, that they find fault with what was drawn up against themselves, just as the Gentiles when they hear that 'the idols of the heathen are silver and gold, the work of men's hands,' think the doctrine of the divine Cross folly. But if those who desire to reopen everything by raising questions belong to those who think they believe aright, and love what the fathers have declared, they are simply doing what the prophet describes, giving their neighbour turbid confusion to drink, and fighting about words to no good purpose, save to the subversion of the simple.

I'm writing this after reading the documents your piety has submitted. I wish they had never been written at all, so that no record of these things would survive for future generations. Who has ever heard such things before? Who ever taught or learned them? For "from Zion shall come forth the law of God, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem," but where did this teaching come from? What hellish pit has spewed out the claim that the Body born of Mary is coessential with the Godhead of the Word? Or that the Word has been changed into flesh, bones, hair, and the entire body, and transformed from its own physis? Who has ever heard in a church, or even from Christians, that the Lord wore a body only in appearance and not in reality? Who has gone so far in impiety as to say and believe that this Godhead, which is coessential with the Father, was circumcised and became imperfect instead of perfect, and that what hung upon the tree was not the body but the very creative Essence and Wisdom? Who could call someone a Christian who hears that the Word transformed for himself a body capable of suffering, not from Mary but from his own Essence? Who invented this abominable impiety, for it even to enter his imagination and for him to say that declaring the Lord's Body to be from Mary means holding a Tetrad instead of a Triad in the Godhead? Those who think this way are saying that the Body of the Savior which he took from Mary is of the Essence of the Triad. And from what source have certain people vomited an impiety as great as those already mentioned—namely, saying that the body is not newer than the Godhead of the Word but was coeternal with it always, since it was composed of the Essence of Wisdom? How did people calling themselves Christians dare even to doubt whether the Lord who came forth from Mary, while being Son of God by Essence and Nature, is of the seed of David according to the flesh and of the flesh of the Holy Mary? Who has been so bold as to say that Christ who suffered in the flesh and was crucified is not Lord, Savior, God, and Son of the Father? How can those who say that the Word descended upon a holy man as upon one of the prophets, and did not himself become man by taking the body from Mary, wish to be called Christians—and that Christ is one person while the Word of God, who before Mary and before the ages was Son of the Father, is another? How can those who say that the Son is one and the Word of God is another be Christians?

2. I write this after reading the memoranda submitted by your piety, which I could wish had not been written at all, so that not even any record of these things should go down to posterity. For who ever yet heard the like? Who ever taught or learned it? For 'from Sion shall come forth the law of God, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem Isaiah 2:3; Micah 4:2;' but whence came forth this? What lower region has vomited the statement that the Body born of Mary is coessential with the Godhead of the Word? Or that the Word has been changed into flesh, bones, hair, and the whole body, and altered from its own nature? Or who ever heard in a Church, or even from Christians, that the Lord wore a body putatively, not in nature; or who ever went so far in impiety as to say and hold, that this Godhead, which is coessential with the Father, was circumcised and became imperfect instead of perfect; and that what hung upon the tree was not the body, but the very creative Essence and Wisdom? Or who that hears that the Word transformed for Himself a passible body, not of Mary, but of His own Essence, could call him who said this a Christian? Or who devised this abominable impiety, for it to enter even his imagination, and for him to say that to pronounce the Lord's Body to be of Mary is to hold a Tetrad instead of a Triad in the Godhead? Those who think thus, saying that the Body of the Saviour which He put on from Mary, is of the Essence of the Triad. Or whence again have certain vomited an impiety as great as those already mentioned; saying namely, that the body is not newer than the Godhead of the Word, but was coeternal with it always, since it was compounded of the Essence of Wisdom. Or how did men called Christians venture even to doubt whether the Lord, Who proceeded from Mary, while Son of God by Essence and Nature, is of the seed of David according to the flesh Romans 1:3, and of the flesh of the Holy Mary? Or who have been so venturesome as to say that Christ Who suffered in the flesh and was crucified is not Lord, Saviour, God, and Son of the Father? Or how can they wish to be called Christians who say that the Word has descended upon a holy man as upon one of the prophets, and has not Himself become man, taking the body from Mary; but that Christ is one person, while the Word of God, Who before Mary and before the ages was Son of the Father, is another? Or how can they be Christians who say that the Son is one, and the Word of God another?

These were the contents of the memoranda: various statements, but unified in their perspective and meaning, leading toward impiety. These were the issues over which people who boast in the confession of the fathers drawn up at Nicaea were arguing and quarreling with one another. But I am amazed that your piety allowed it, and that you did not stop those who said such things and present to them the right faith, so that upon hearing it they might be silent, or if they opposed it might be considered heretics. For these statements are not appropriate for Christians to make or to hear; on the contrary, they are in every way foreign to the Apostolic teaching. For this reason, as I said earlier, I have included what they say plainly in my letter, so that anyone who simply hears it may perceive the disgrace and impiety it contains. And although it would be right to denounce and fully expose the foolishness of those who have held such ideas, it would be a good thing to end my letter here and write no more. For what is so clearly shown to be evil does not need further time spent exposing it, in case argumentative people think the matter is uncertain. It is enough simply to answer such things as follows: we are content with the fact that this is not the teaching of the Catholic Church, nor did the fathers hold this. But to prevent the inventors of evil things from using our complete silence as an excuse for shamelessness, it will be good to mention a few points from Holy Scripture, in case they may even then be put to shame and cease from these foul schemes.

3. Such were the contents of the memoranda; diverse statements, but one in their sense and in their meaning; tending to impiety. It was for these things that men who make their boast in the confession of the fathers drawn up at Nicæa were disputing and quarrelling with one another. But I marvel that your piety suffered it, and that you did not stop those who said such things, and propound to them the right faith, so that upon hearing it they might hold their peace, or if they opposed it might be counted as heretics. For the statements are not fit for Christians to make or to hear, on the contrary they are in every way alien from the Apostolic teaching. For this reason, as I said above, I have caused what they say to be baldly inserted in my letter, so that one who merely hears may perceive the shame and impiety therein contained. And although it would be right to denounce and expose in full the folly of those who have had such ideas, yet it would be a good thing to close my letter here and write no more. For what is so manifestly shown to be evil, it is not necessary to waste time in exposing further, lest contentious persons think the matter doubtful. It is enough merely to answer such things as follows: we are content with the fact that this is not the teaching of the Catholic Church, nor did the fathers hold this. But lest the 'inventors of evil things Romans 1:30 ' make entire silence on our part a pretext for shamelessness, it will be well to mention a few points from Holy Scripture, in case they may even thus be put to shame, and cease from these foul devices.

Where did you get the idea, gentlemen, to say that the Body is of one ousia with the Godhead of the Word? It is good to begin at this point, so that by showing this opinion to be unsound, all the other opinions may be proved to be the same. Now from the divine Scriptures we discover nothing of the kind. For they say that God came in a human body. But the fathers who assembled at Nicaea say that not the body, but the Son Himself is consubstantial with the Father, and that while He is of the ousia of the Father, the body, as they acknowledged according to the Scriptures, is of Mary. Either deny the Synod of Nicaea, then, and as heretics bring in your doctrine from the side; or, if you wish to be children of the fathers, do not hold the opposite of what they wrote. For here again you may see how monstrous it is: If the Word is consubstantial with the body which is of earthly nature, while the Word is, by your own confession, consubstantial with the Father, it will follow that even the Father Himself is consubstantial with the body produced from the earth. And why any longer blame the Arians for calling the Son a creature, when you go off to another form of impiety, saying that the Word was changed into flesh and bones and hair and muscles and all the body, and was altered from its own physis? For it is time for you to say openly that He was born of earth; for from earth is the physis of the bones and of all the body. What then is this great folly of yours, that you fight even with one another? For in saying that the Word is consubstantial with the Body, you distinguish the one from the other, while in saying that He has been changed into flesh, you imagine a change of the Word Himself. And who will tolerate you any longer if you so much as utter these opinions? For you have gone further in impiety than any heresy. For if the Word is consubstantial with the Body, the commemoration and the work of Mary are superfluous, inasmuch as the body could have existed before Mary, just as the Word also is eternal—if, that is, it is as you say consubstantial with the Body. Or what need was there even of the Word coming among us, to put on what was consubstantial with Himself, or to change His own physis and become a body? For the Deity does not take hold (Hebrews 2:16) of itself, so as to put on what is of its own ousia, any more than the Word sinned, in that it ransoms the sins of others, in order that changing into a body it should offer itself a sacrifice for itself, and ransom itself.

4. Whence did it occur to you, sirs, to say that the Body is of one Essence with the Godhead of the Word? For it is well to begin at this point, in order that by showing this opinion to be unsound, all the others too may be proved to be the same. Now from the divine Scriptures we discover nothing of the kind. For they say that God came in a human body. But the fathers who also assembled at Nicæa say that, not the body, but the Son Himself is coessential with the Father, and that while He is of the Essence of the Father, the body, as they admitted according to the Scriptures, is of Mary. Either then deny the Synod of Nicæa, and as heretics bring in your doctrine from the side; or, if you wish to be children of the fathers, do not hold the contrary of what they wrote. For here again you may see how monstrous it is: If the Word is coessential with the body which is of earthly nature, while the Word is, by your own confession, coessential with the Father, it will follow that even the Father Himself is coessential with the body produced from the earth. And why any longer blame the Arians for calling the Son a creature, when you go off to another form of impiety, saying that the Word was changed into flesh and bones and hair and muscles and all the body, and was altered from its own nature? For it is time for you to say openly that He was born of earth; for from earth is the nature of the bones and of all the body. What then is this great folly of yours, that you fight even with one another? For in saying that the Word is coessential with the Body, you distinguish the one from the other, while in saying that He has been changed into flesh, you imagine a change of the Word Himself. And who will tolerate you any longer if you so much as utter these opinions? For you have gone further in impiety than any heresy. For if the Word is coessential with the Body, the commemoration and the work of Mary are superfluous, inasmuch as the body could have existed before Mary, just as the Word also is eternal: if, that is, it is as you say co-essential with the Body. Or what need was there even of the Word coming among us, to put on what was coessential with Himself, or to change His own nature and become a body? For the Deity does not take hold Hebrews 2:16 of itself, so as to put on what is of its own Essence, any more than the Word sinned, in that it ransoms the sins of others, in order that changing into a body it should offer itself a sacrifice for itself, and ransom itself.

But this is not so—far from it! For he "takes hold of the seed of Abraham," as the apostle said. Therefore it was necessary for him to be made like his brothers in all things and to take a body like ours. This is why Mary is truly presupposed, so that he may take it from her and offer it for us as his own. Isaiah pointed to this in his prophecy with the words "Behold the Virgin," while Gabriel is sent to her—not simply to a virgin, but "to a virgin betrothed to a man"—in order that through the betrothed man he might show that Mary was really a human being. For this reason Scripture also mentions her giving birth and tells of her wrapping him in swaddling clothes. Therefore too the breasts that he sucked were called blessed. And he was offered as a sacrifice, in that the one who was born had opened the womb. Now all these things are proofs that the Virgin gave birth. And Gabriel preached the gospel to her without uncertainty, saying not merely "what is born in you," lest the body should be thought to be externally imposed upon her, but "of you," so that what was born might be believed to come naturally from her, since nature clearly shows that it is impossible for a virgin to produce milk unless she has given birth, and impossible for a body to be nourished with milk and wrapped in swaddling clothes unless it has previously been naturally born. This is the meaning of his being circumcised on the eighth day, of Symeon taking him in his arms, of his becoming a young child and growing when he was twelve years old, and of his reaching his thirtieth year. For it was not, as some suppose, the very ousia of the Word that was changed and was circumcised, because it is incapable of alteration or change. For the Savior himself says, "Behold, behold, it is I, and I change not," while Paul writes, "Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today, and forever." But in the body which was circumcised and carried and ate and drank and was weary and was nailed on the tree and suffered, there was the impassible and incorporeal Word of God. This body it was that was laid in a grave when the Word had left it, yet was not separated from it, to preach, as Peter says, also to the spirits in prison.

5. But this is not so, far be the thought. For he 'takes hold of the seed of Abraham Hebrews 2:16,' as the apostle said; whence it behooved Him to be made like His brethren in all things, and to take a Body like us. This is why Mary is truly presupposed, in order that He may take it from her, and offer it for us as His own. And this Isaiah pointed to in his prophecy, in the words: 'Behold the Virgin Isaiah 7:14,' while Gabriel is sent to her — not simply to a virgin, but 'to a virgin betrothed to a man Luke 1:27,' in order that by means of the betrothed man he might show that Mary was really a human being. And for this reason Scripture also mentions her bringing forth, and tells of her wrapping Him in swaddling clothes; and therefore, too, the paps which He sucked were called blessed. And He was offered as a sacrifice, in that He Who was born had opened the womb. Now all these things are proofs that the Virgin brought forth. And Gabriel preached the Gospel to her without uncertainty, saying not merely 'what is born in you,' lest the body should be thought to be extraneously induced upon her, but 'of you,' that what was born might be believed to be naturally from her, inasmuch as Nature clearly shows that it is impossible for a virgin to produce milk unless she has brought forth, and impossible for a body to be nourished with milk and wrapped in swaddling clothes unless it has previously been naturally brought forth. This is the meaning of His being circumcised on the eighth day: of Symeon taking Him in his arms, of His becoming a young child, and growing when He was twelve years old, and of His coming to His thirtieth year. For it was not, as some suppose, the very Essence of the Word that was changed, and was circumcised, because it is incapable of alteration or change. For the Saviour Himself says, 'Behold, behold, it is I, and I change not Malachi 3:6,' while Paul writes: ' Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today, and for ever Hebrews 13:8.' But in the Body which was circumcised, and carried, and ate and drank, and was weary, and was nailed on the tree and suffered, there was the impassible and incorporeal Word of God. This Body it was that was laid in a grave, when the Word had left it, yet was not parted from it, to preach, as Peter says, also to the spirits in prison 1 Peter 3:19.

This especially demonstrates the foolishness of those who claim the Word was transformed into bones and flesh. If that were true, there would have been no need for a tomb. The Body would have gone by itself to preach to the spirits in Hades. But as it actually happened, He Himself went to preach, while Joseph wrapped the Body in linen cloth and laid it in Golgotha. This shows everyone that the Body was not the Word, but the Body of the Word. This is what Thomas touched when it had risen from the dead, and he saw in it the marks of the nails, which the Word Himself had endured, seeing them driven into His own Body—and though He could have prevented it, He did not. Instead, the incorporeal Word made the properties of the Body His own, since it was His own Body. When the servant struck the Body, He asked as one suffering, "Why do you strike Me?" And being by nature intangible, the Word still said, "I gave My back to the whips and My cheeks to blows, and did not hide My face from shame and spitting." Whatever the human Body of the Word suffered, the Word dwelling in the body attributed to Himself, so that we might be enabled to share in the Godhead of the Word. It is truly remarkable that He both suffered and did not suffer. He suffered because His own Body suffered and He was in it while it suffered; He did not suffer because the Word, being God by nature, is impassible. While He, the incorporeal one, was in the passible Body, the Body contained in it the impassible Word, who was destroying the weaknesses inherent in the Body. He did this so that by taking what was ours and offering it as a sacrifice, He might do away with it, and conversely might clothe us with what was His, causing the Apostle to say: "This corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality."

6. And this above all shows the foolishness of those who say that the Word was changed into bones and flesh. For if this had been so, there were no need of a tomb. For the Body would have gone by itself to preach to the spirits in Hades. But as it was, He Himself went to preach, while the Body Joseph wrapped in a linen cloth, and laid it away at Golgotha. Mark 15:46 And so it is shown to all that the Body was not the Word, but Body of the Word. And it was this that Thomas handled when it had risen from the dead, and saw in it the print of the nails, which the Word Himself had undergone, seeing them fixed in His own Body, and though able to prevent it, did not do so. On the contrary, the incorporeal Word made His own the properties of the Body, as being His own Body. Why, when the Body was struck by the attendant, as suffering Himself He asked, 'Why do you smite Me John 18:23?' And being by nature intangible, the Word yet said, 'I gave My back to the stripes, and My cheeks to blows, and hid not My face from shame and spitting Isaiah 50:6.' For what the human Body of the Word suffered, this the Word, dwelling in the body, ascribed to Himself, in order that we might be enabled to be partakers of the Godhead of the Word. And verily it is strange that He it was Who suffered and yet suffered not. Suffered, because His own Body suffered, and He was in it, which thus suffered; suffered not, because the Word, being by Nature God, is impassible. And while He, the incorporeal, was in the passible Body, the Body had in it the impassible Word, which was destroying the infirmities inherent in the Body. But this He did, and so it was, in order that Himself taking what was ours and offering it as a sacrifice, He might do away with it, and conversely might invest us with what was His, and cause the Apostle to say: 'This corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal put on immortality 1 Corinthians 15:53.'

This did not happen in a false or imaginary way, as some have suggested—absolutely not! Rather, the Savior truly became a human being, and so the salvation of the entire person was accomplished. For if the Word was in the Body in a false way, as they claim, and by "false" they mean imaginary, then it follows that both the salvation and resurrection of humanity are only apparent, as the completely impious Manichaeus taught. But in truth our salvation is not merely apparent, nor does it apply only to the body. Instead, the entire person—both body and soul—has truly obtained salvation in the Word Himself. Therefore, what was born of Mary was, according to the divine Scriptures, human by nature, and the Body of the Lord was a real one. It was this because it was the same as our body, for Mary was our sister since we all descend from Adam. No one can doubt this when they remember what Luke wrote. For after He had risen from the dead, when some thought they were not seeing the Lord in the body derived from Mary but were looking at a spirit instead, He said, "See My hands and My feet, and the marks of the nails, that it is I Myself. Touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see Me having." And when He had said this, He showed them His hands and His feet. From this, those who have dared to say that the Lord was transformed into flesh and bones can be refuted. For He did not say, "As you see Me being flesh and bone," but "as you see Me having," so that it would not be thought that the Word Himself was changed into these things, but that He might be believed to have them after His resurrection just as He did before His death.

7. Now this did not come to pass putatively, as some have supposed: far be the thought: but the Saviour having in very truth become Man, the salvation of the whole man was brought about. For if the Word were in the Body putatively, as they say, and by putative is meant imaginary, it follows that both the salvation and the resurrection of man is apparent only, as the most impious Manichæus held. But truly our salvation is not merely apparent, nor does it extend to the body only, but the whole man, body and soul alike, has truly obtained salvation in the Word Himself. That then which was born of Mary was according to the divine Scriptures human by nature, and the Body of the Lord was a true one; but it was this, because it was the same as our body, for Mary was our sister inasmuch as we all are from Adam. And no one can doubt of this when he remembers what Luke wrote. For after He had risen from the dead, when some thought that they did not see the Lord in the body derived from Mary, but were beholding a spirit instead, He said, 'See My hands and My feet, and the prints of the nails, that it is I Myself: handle Me and see; for a spirit has not flesh and bones as you see Me to have. And when He had said thus, He showed them His hands and His feet Luke 24:39.' Whence they can be refuted who have ventured to say that the Lord was transformed into flesh and bones. For He did not say, 'As you see Me to be flesh and bone,' but 'as you see Me to have,' in order that it might not be thought that the Word Himself was changed into these things, but that He might be believed to have them after His resurrection as well as before His death.

These points having been demonstrated in this way, it is unnecessary to address the other issues or to engage in any discussion about them, since the body in which the Word dwelt is not coessential with the Godhead but was truly born of Mary, while the Word Himself was not transformed into bones and flesh but came in the flesh. For what John said, "The Word was made flesh," has this meaning, as we can see from a similar passage; for it is written in Paul: "Christ has become a curse for us." And just as He did not Himself become a curse, but is said to have done so because He took upon Himself the curse on our behalf, so also He became flesh not by being transformed into flesh, but because He assumed living flesh on our behalf and became Man. For to say "the Word became flesh" is the same as saying "the Word became man," according to what is said in Joel: "I will pour forth of My Spirit upon all flesh"; for the promise did not extend to irrational animals, but to human beings, for whose sake the Lord became Man. Since this is the meaning of the above text, all those who have thought that the flesh derived from Mary existed before her, and that the Word had a human soul before her and existed in it always even before His coming, will reasonably condemn themselves. And those who have said that the Flesh was not subject to death but belonged to the immortal Nature will also cease. For if it did not die, how could Paul declare to the Corinthians "that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures," or how did He rise at all if He did not also die? Again, those who have even entertained the possibility of a Tetrad instead of a Triad resulting if it were said that the Body was derived from Mary will blush deeply. For if (they argue) we say the Body is of one ousia with the Word, the Triad remains a Triad; for then the Word introduces no foreign element into it; but if we admit that the Body derived from Mary is human, it follows, since the Body is foreign in ousia, and the Word is in it, that the addition of the Body causes a Tetrad instead of a Triad.

8. These things being thus demonstrated, it is superfluous to touch upon the other points, or to enter upon any discussion relating to them, since the body in which the Word was is not coessential with the Godhead, but was truly born of Mary, while the Word Himself was not changed into bones and flesh, but came in the flesh. For what John said, 'The Word was made flesh John 1:14,' has this meaning, as we may see by a similar passage; for it is written in Paul: 'Christ has become a curse for us Galatians 3:13.' And just as He has not Himself become a curse, but is said to have done so because He took upon Him the curse on our behalf, so also He has become flesh not by being changed into flesh, but because He assumed on our behalf living flesh, and has become Man. For to say 'the Word became flesh,' is equivalent to saying 'the Word has become man;' according to what is said in Joel: 'I will pour forth of My Spirit upon all flesh Joel 2:28;' for the promise did not extend to the irrational animals, but is for men, on whose account the Lord has become Man. As then this is the sense of the above text, they all will reasonably condemn themselves who have thought that the flesh derived from Mary existed before her, and that the Word, prior to her, had a human soul, and existed in it always even before His coming. And they too will cease who have said that the Flesh was not accessible to death, but belonged to the immortal Nature. For if it did not die, how could Paul deliver to the Corinthians 'that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures 1 Corinthians 15:3,' or how did He rise at all if He did not also die? Again, they will blush deeply who have even entertained the possibility of a Tetrad instead of a Triad resulting, if it were said that the Body was derived from Mary. For if (they argue) we say the Body is of one Essence with the Word, the Triad remains a Triad; for then the Word imports no foreign element into it; but if we admit that the Body derived from Mary is human, it follows, since the Body is foreign in Essence, and the Word is in it, that the addition of the Body causes a Tetrad instead of a Triad.

When they argue in this way, they fail to see the contradiction they create for themselves. For even though they claim that the Body is not from Mary but is coessential with the Word, nevertheless (the very point they try to hide, to avoid being identified with their actual belief) this can be shown on their own premises to involve a Tetrad. For just as the Son, according to the Fathers, is coessential with the Father, but is not the Father Himself, but is called coessential as Son with Father, so the Body, which they call coessential with the Word, is not the Word Himself, but a distinct entity. But if this is so, on their own reasoning, their Triad will be a Tetrad. For the true, genuinely perfect and indivisible Triad is not open to addition as is the Triad these people imagine. And how do these remain Christians who imagine another God in addition to the true one? For, once again, in their other error one can see how great their folly is. For if they think, because it is contained and stated in the Scriptures that the Body of the Savior is human and derived from Mary, that a Tetrad is substituted for a Triad, as though the Body created an addition, they are very badly mistaken, so much so as to make the creature equal to the Creator, and suppose that the Godhead can receive an addition. And they have failed to perceive that the Word has become Flesh, not by reason of an addition to the Godhead, but in order that the flesh may rise again. Nor did the Word proceed from Mary that He might be improved, but that He might ransom the human race. How then can they think that the Body, ransomed and given life by the Word, made an addition in respect of Godhead to the Word that had given it life? For on the contrary, a great addition has come to the human Body itself from the fellowship and union of the Word with it. For instead of mortal it has become immortal; and, though an animal body, it has become spiritual, and though made from earth it entered the heavenly gates. The Triad, then, although the Word took a body from Mary, is a Triad, being inaccessible to addition or diminution; but it is always perfect, and in the Triad one Godhead is recognized, and so in the Church one God is preached, the Father of the Word.

9. When they argue thus, they fail to perceive the contradiction in which they involve themselves. For even though they say that the Body is not from Mary, but is coessential with the Word, yet none the less (the very point they dissemble, to avoid being credited with their real opinion) this on their own premises can be proved to involve a Tetrad. For as the Son, according to the Fathers, is coessential with the Father, but is not the Father Himself, but is called coessential, as Son with Father, so the Body, which they call coessential with the Word, is not the Word Himself, but a distinct entity. But if so, on their own showing, their Triad will be a Tetrad. For the true, really perfect and indivisible Triad is not accessible to addition as is the Triad imagined by these persons. And how do these remain Christians who imagine another God in addition to the true one? For, once again, in their other fallacy one can see how great is their folly. For if they think because it is contained and stated in the Scriptures, that the Body of the Saviour is human and derived from Mary, that a Tetrad is substituted for a Triad, as though the Body created an addition, they go very far wrong, so much so as to make the creature equal to the Creator, and suppose that the Godhead can receive an addition. And they have failed to perceive that the Word has become Flesh, not by reason of an addition to the Godhead, but in order that the flesh may rise again. Nor did the Word proceed from Mary that He might be bettered, but that He might ransom the human race. How then can they think that the Body, ransomed and quickened by the Word, made an addition in respect of Godhead to the Word that had quickened it? For on the contrary, a great addition has accrued to the human Body itself from the fellowship and union of the Word with it. For instead of mortal it has become immortal; and, though an animal body, it has become spiritual, and though made from earth it entered the heavenly gates. The Triad, then, although the Word took a body from Mary, is a Triad, being inaccessible to addition or diminution; but it is always perfect, and in the Triad one Godhead is recognised, and so in the Church one God is preached, the Father of the Word.

For this reason, those people will also keep silent from now on who once said that the one who came forth from Mary is not truly Christ, or Lord, or God. For if he were not God in the body, how did he, upon coming forth from Mary, immediately get called 'Emmanuel, which means God with us'? Again, if the Word was not in the flesh, why did Paul write to the Romans 'from whom is Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen'? So let them confess—even those who previously denied that the Crucified One was God—that they have been wrong. For the divine Scriptures command them to do so, and especially Thomas, who, after seeing on him the mark of the nails, cried out 'My Lord and my God!' For the Son, being God and Lord of glory, was in the body that was dishonorably nailed and dishonored. But the body, while it suffered—being pierced on the tree with water and blood flowing from its side—yet because it was a temple of the Word, was filled full of the Godhead. For this reason, the sun, seeing its creator suffering in his violated body, withdrew its rays and darkened the earth. But the body itself, being of mortal nature, rose again beyond its own nature because of the Word that was in it. And it has stopped experiencing natural corruption and, having put on the Word who is above humanity, has become incorruptible.

10. For this reason they also will henceforth keep silence, who once said that He who proceeded from Mary is not very Christ, or Lord, or God. For if He were not God in the Body, how came He, upon proceeding from Mary, straightway to be called ' Emmanuel, which is being interpreted God with us Matthew 1:23?' Why again, if the Word was not in the flesh, did Paul write to the Romans 'of whom is Christ after the flesh, Who is above all God blessed forever. Amen Romans 9:5?' Let them therefore confess, even they who previously denied that the Crucified was God, that they have erred; for the divine Scriptures bid them, and especially Thomas, who, after seeing upon Him the print of the nails, cried out 'My Lord and my God John 20:28!' For the Son, being God, and Lord of glory 1 Corinthians 2:8, was in the Body which was ingloriously nailed and dishonoured; but the Body, while it suffered, being pierced on the tree, and water and blood flowed from its side, yet because it was a temple of the Word was filled full of the Godhead. For this reason it was that the sun, seeing its creator suffering in His outraged body, withdrew its rays and darkened the earth. But the body itself being of mortal nature, beyond its own nature rose again by reason of the Word which was in it; and it has ceased from natural corruption, and, having put on the Word which is above man, has become incorruptible.

But regarding the idea held by some who say that the Word came upon one particular man, the son of Mary, just as it came upon each of the prophets, it is unnecessary to discuss this, since their madness carries its own clear condemnation with it. For if he came in this way, why was that man born of a virgin and not like others from a man and woman? For in this way each of the saints was also begotten. Or why, if the Word came in this way, is the death of each one not said to have taken place on our behalf, but only this man's death? Or why, if the Word dwelt among us in the case of each one of the prophets, is it said only in the case of him born of Mary that he dwelt here once at the consummation of the ages? Or why, if he came as he had come in the saints of former times, did the son of Mary alone rise again on the third day, while all the rest had died without rising yet? Or why, if the Word had come in the same manner as he had done in the other cases, is the son of Mary alone called Emmanuel, as though a body filled full of the Godhead were born of her? For Emmanuel is interpreted God with us. Or why, if he came in this way, is it not said that when each of the saints ate, drank, labored, and died, that he—the Word—ate, drank, labored, and died, but only in the case of the son of Mary? For what that body suffered is said to have been suffered by the Word. And while we are merely told of the others that they were born and begotten, it is said in the case of the son of Mary alone that the Word was made flesh.

11. But with regard to the imagination of some, who say that the Word came upon one particular man, the Son of Mary, just as it came upon each of the Prophets, it is superfluous to discuss it, since their madness carries its own condemnation manifestly with it. For if He came thus, why was that man born of a virgin, and not like others of a man and woman? For in this way each of the saints also was begotten. Or why, if the Word came thus, is not the death of each one said to have taken place on our behalf, but only this man's death? Or why, if the Word sojourned among us in the case of each one of the prophets, is it said only in the case of Him born of Mary that He sojourned here 'once at the consummation of the ages Hebrews 9:26?' Or why, if He came as He had come in the saints of former times, did the Son of Mary alone, while all the rest had died without rising as yet, rise again on the third day? Or why, if the Word had come in like manner as He had done in the other cases, is the Son of Mary alone called Emmanuel, as though a Body filled full of the Godhead were born of her? For Emmanuel is interpreted 'God with us.' Or why, if He came thus, is it not said that when each of the saints ate, drank, laboured, and died, that He (the Word) ate, drank, laboured, and died, but only in the case of the Son of Mary. For what that Body suffered is said to have been suffered by the Word. And while we are merely told of the others that they were born, and begotten, it is said in the case of the Son of Mary alone that 'The Word was made Flesh.'

This proves that while the Word came to all the others so that they might prophesy, from Mary the Word Himself took flesh and came forth as a man. He is by nature and ousia the Word of God, but according to the flesh a man from the seed of David, made from the flesh of Mary, as Paul said. The Father pointed Him out both in the Jordan and on the Mount, saying, "This is My beloved Son in whom I am well pleased." The Arians denied Him, but we recognize and worship Him, not dividing the Son and the Word, but knowing that the Son is the Word Himself, through Whom all things are made and through Whom we were redeemed. For this reason we are amazed that any dispute has arisen among you about things so clear. But thanks to the Lord, as much as we were grieved when reading your documents, we were equally glad at their conclusion. For they departed in harmony and peacefully agreed in the confession of the pious and orthodox faith. This fact has prompted me, after much prior thought, to write these few words, for I am concerned that my silence on this matter might cause pain rather than joy to those whose harmony brings us joy. Therefore I ask your piety first, and secondly those who hear this, to receive my letter kindly, and if anything is lacking in it regarding piety, to correct that and inform me. But if it is written below the level of the subject and imperfectly, as from someone unskilled in speaking, let everyone make allowance for my weakness in speech. Greet all the brothers with you. All those with us greet you. May you live in good health in the Lord, beloved and truly longed for.

12. This proves that while to all the others the Word came, in order that they might prophesy, from Mary the Word Himself took flesh, and proceeded forth as man; being by nature and essence the Word of God, but after the flesh man of the seed of David, and made of the flesh of Mary, as Paul said. Him the Father pointed out both in Jordan and on the Mount, saying, 'This is My beloved Son in whom I am well pleased.' Him the Arians denied, but we recognising worship, not dividing the Son and the Word, but knowing that the Son is the Word Himself, by Whom all things are made, and by Whom we were redeemed. And for this reason we wonder how any contention at all has arisen among you about things so clear. But thanks to the Lord, much as we were grieved at reading your memoranda, we were equally glad at their conclusion. For they departed with concord, and peacefully agreed in the confession of the pious and orthodox faith. This fact has induced me, after much previous consideration, to write these few words; for I am anxious lest by my silence this matter should cause pain rather than joy to those whose concord occasions joy to ourselves. I therefore ask your piety in the first place, and secondly those who hear, to take my letter in good part, and if anything is lacking in it in respect of piety, to set that right, and inform me. But if it is written, as from one unpractised in speech, below the subject and imperfectly, let all allow for my feebleness in speaking. Greet all the brethren with you. All those with us greet you; may you live in good health in the Lord, beloved and truly longed for.


Festal Letters — Letter 58

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806058.htm>.

Opening

Second Letter to Orsisius.

Second Letter to Orsisius.

When the most holy Archbishop Athanasius heard about our father Theodorus, he was grieved and sent this letter to Abbot Orsisius and the brethren to console them for his death, as follows:

'But the most holy Archbishop Athanasius, when he heard about our father Theodorus, was grieved, and sent this letter to the Abbat Orsisius and the brethren to console them for his decease, as follows:'–

Athanasius to Orsisius, the Abbat and father of monks, and to all who are with him who practice the solitary life and are firmly established in faith in God—beloved brothers whom I deeply long for in the Lord—greetings.

Athanasius to Orsisius, Abbat, father of monks, and to all with him who practise the solitary life, and are settled in faith in God, beloved brethren most longed for in the Lord, greeting.

I have heard about the death of blessed Theodorus, and the news caused me great distress, knowing as I did his importance to you. Now if it had not been Theodorus, I would have written many words to you, with tears, thinking about what comes after death. But since it is Theodorus whom you and I have known, what need is there for me to say in my letter except "Blessed is" Theodorus, "who has not walked in the council of the ungodly"? But if "he is blessed who fears the Lord," we may now confidently call him blessed, having the firm assurance that he has reached what is like a harbor, and has a life without worry. If only the same had happened to each one of us; if only each of us in his race might arrive in this way; if only each of us, on his voyage, might anchor his own boat there in the stormless harbor, so that, at rest with the fathers, he might say, "here will I dwell, for I have a delight in it." Therefore, beloved brethren whom I long for deeply, do not weep for Theodorus, for he "is not dead, but sleeps." Let no one weep when he remembers him, but imitate his way of life. For one must not grieve over someone who has gone to the place where grief does not exist. This I write to all of you together; but especially to you, beloved Orsisius whom I long for deeply, so that now that he has fallen asleep, you may take up the whole responsibility, and take his place among the brethren. For while he was alive, you two were as one, and when one was away, the work of both was carried on: and when both were present you were as one, teaching the beloved ones what was for their good. Act this way, then, and in doing so write and tell me about your own well-being and that of the brotherhood. And I urge all of you to pray together that the Lord may grant further peace to the Churches. For we now celebrated the feast with joy, both Easter and Pentecost, and we rejoice in the blessings of the Lord. I write to all of you. Greet all who fear the Lord. Those with me greet you. I pray that you may be well in the Lord, beloved brethren whom I long for deeply.

I have heard about the decease of the blessed Theodorus, and the tidings caused me great anxiety, knowing as I did his value to you. Now if it had not been Theodorus, I should have used many words to you, with tears, considering what follows after death. But since it is Theodorus whom you and I have known, what need I say in my letter save 'Blessed is' Theodorus, 'who has not walked in the council of the ungodly?' But if 'he is blessed that fears the Lord,' we may now confidently call him blessed, having the firm assurance that he has reached as it were a haven, and has a life without care. Would that the same had also befallen each one of us; would that each of us in his running might thus arrive; would that each of us, on his voyage, might moor his own bark there in the stormless haven, so that, at rest with the fathers, he might say, 'here will I dwell, for I have a delight therein.' Wherefore, brethren beloved and most longed-for, weep not for Theodorus, for he 'is not dead, but sleeps Matthew 9:24.' Let none weep when he remembers him, but imitate his life. For one must not grieve over one that is gone to the place where grief is not. This I write to you all in common; but especially to you, beloved and most longed for Orsisius, in order that now that he is fallen asleep, you may take up the whole charge, and take his place among the brethren. For while he survived, you two were as one, and when one was away, the work of both was carried on: and when both were there you were as one, discoursing to the beloved ones what made for their good. Thus act, then, and so doing write and tell me of the safety of yourself and of the brotherhood. And I exhort you all to pray together that the Lord may grant further peace to the Churches. For we now kept festival with joy, both Easter and Pentecost, and we rejoice in the benefits of the Lord. I write to you all. Greet all who fear the Lord. Those with me greet you. I pray that you may be well in the Lord, beloved and much-longed-for brethren.


Festal Letters — Letter 57

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806057.htm>.

Opening

First Letter to Orsisius

First Letter to Orsisius

And after spending a few days there, he said to Abbot Theodore, "Since Passover is near, visit the brothers as you usually do, and I will do as the Lord directs me." He embraced him and sent him on his way, having written a letter through him to Abbot Orsisius and the brothers, as follows:

' And having spent a few days there, he saith to the Abbat Theodorus: Since the Passover is near, visit the brethren after your manner; and as the Lord shall dispose me, I will do. And he embraced him, and sent him away, having written a letter by him to the Abbat Orsisius and the brethren, to the following effect:'–

I have seen your fellow-worker and father of the brethren, Theodorus, and in him I saw the master of our father Pachomius. I was filled with joy to see the sons of the Church, and their presence made me glad. But the Lord will reward them. When Theodorus was about to leave me to return to you, he said to me: Remember me. And I said to him: If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand be forgotten, yes let my tongue stick to my throat if I do not remember you.

I have seen your fellow-worker and father of the brethren, Theodorus, and in him the master of our father Pachomius. And I rejoiced to see the sons of the Church, and they made me glad by their presence. But the Lord is their recompenser. And as Theodorus was about to leave me for you, he said to me: Remember me. And I said to him: If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand be forgotten, yea let my tongue cleave to my throat if I remember you not.


Festal Letters — Letter 56

One of the Easter letters the Pope of Alexandria sent each year to the churches of Egypt, announcing the date of the Fast and of Pascha.

Source: Translated by Archibald Robertson. From Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series , Vol. 4. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. ( Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892. ) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806056.htm>.

Opening

To Emperor Jovian Concerning the Faith

To the Emperor Jovian concerning the Faith

A desire to learn and a longing for heavenly things befits a religious Emperor; for in this way you will truly have your heart in the hand of God. Since your Piety wished to learn from us the faith of the Catholic Church, we give thanks to the Lord for this and advise you above all to remember the faith confessed by the Fathers at Nicaea. Certain people have rejected this faith and have plotted against us in many ways because we would not go along with the Arian heresy. They have become the authors of heresy and divisions in the Catholic Church. The true and devout faith in the Lord has been made clear to everyone, being both known and read from the Divine Scriptures. In this faith the saints were made perfect and suffered martyrdom, and have now departed in the Lord. This faith would have remained unchanged forever had not the wickedness of certain heretics dared to tamper with it. A certain Arius and his followers attempted to corrupt it and to introduce impiety in its place, claiming that the Son of God was made from nothing and was a creature, a thing made and changeable. With these words they deceived many, so that even those who seemed to be important were carried away by their blasphemy. But our holy Fathers, as we said before, quickly assembled together at the Synod at Nicaea and condemned them, and confessed in writing the faith of the Catholic Church, so that by preaching this everywhere, the heresy kindled by the heretics might be extinguished. This faith was then sincerely known and preached everywhere in every Church. But now certain people who wish to revive the Arian heresy have dared to reject this faith confessed at Nicaea by the Fathers, and while pretending to confess it, they actually deny it, explaining away the Coessential, and blaspheming on their own initiative against the Holy Spirit by claiming that It is a creature and came into being as a thing made by the Son. In view of the harm done to the people by such blasphemy, we hasten as our duty requires to present to your Piety the faith confessed at Nicaea, so that your religiousness may know what was written with complete accuracy, and how far wrong those are who teach contrary to it.

1. A desire to learn and a yearning for heavenly things is suitable to a religious Emperor; for thus you will truly have 'your heart' also 'in the hand of God.' Since then your Piety desired to learn from us the faith of the Catholic Church, giving thanks for these things to the Lord, we counselled above all things to remind your Piety of the faith confessed by the Fathers at Nicæa. For this certain set at nought, while plotting against us in many ways, because we would not comply with the Arian heresy, and they have become authors of heresy and schisms in the Catholic Church. For the true and pious faith in the Lord has become manifest to all, being both 'known and read ' from the Divine Scriptures. For in it both the saints were made perfect and suffered martyrdom, and now are departed in the Lord; and the faith would have abode inviolate always had not the wickedness of certain heretics presumed to tamper with it. For a certain Arius and those with him attempted to corrupt it, and to introduce impiety in its place, affirming that the Son of God was from nought, and a creature, and a thing made and changeable. But with these words they deceived many, so that even 'they that seemed to be somewhat were carried away,' with their blasphemy. And yet our holy Fathers, as we said before, came promptly together at the Synod at Nicæa, and anathematised them, and confessed in writing the faith of the Catholic Church, so that, this being everywhere preached, the heresy kindled by the heretics might be quenched. This faith then was everywhere in every Church sincerely known and preached. But since now certain who wish to renew the Arian heresy have presumed to set at nought this faith confessed at Nicæa by the Fathers, and while pretending to confess it, do in fact deny it, explaining away the 'Coessential,' and blaspheming of their own accord against the Holy Spirit, in affirming that It is a creature, and came into being as a thing made by the Son, we hasten as of bounden duty, in view of the injury resulting to the people from such blasphemy, to hand to your Piety the faith confessed at Nicæa; in order that your religiousness may know what has been written with all accuracy, and how far wrong they are who teach contrary to it.

You should know, most religious Emperor, that these teachings have been proclaimed from ancient times, and this is the faith that the Fathers who gathered at Nicaea confessed. All the churches everywhere have agreed with it—those in Spain, Britain, Gaul, all of Italy, Dalmatia, Dacia, Moesia, Macedonia, all of Greece, all of Africa, Sardinia, Cyprus, Crete, Pamphylia, Lycia, Isauria, those in Egypt and the Libyan regions, Pontus, Cappadocia, the churches near us, and the churches in the East—except for a few who side with Arius. We have learned the position of all those mentioned above both through direct experience and through letters. And you know, most religious Emperor, that even if a few people speak against this faith, they cannot create a valid objection, since the whole world holds the Apostolic faith. Having been infected by the Arian heresy for a long time, they now oppose the truth all the more stubbornly. So that your Piety may know—though you already know—we are eager to include the faith confessed by the Bishops at Nicaea. The faith confessed at Nicaea by the Fathers is as follows:

2. For know, most religious Augustus, that these things have been preached from time immemorial, and this faith the Fathers who met at Nicæa confessed; and to it have assented all the Churches in every quarter, both those in Spain, and Britain, and the Gauls, and all Italy and Dalmatia, Dacia and Mœsia, Macedonia and all Greece, and in all Africa and Sardinia, and Cyprus and Crete, as well as Pamphylia, Lycia and Isauria, and those in Egypt and the Libyas, Pontus and Cappadocia, and those near at hand to us, and the Churches in the East, except a few who hold with Arius. For of all those above mentioned we have both learnt the opinion by experience, and we have letters. And you know, O most religious Augustus, that even if some few speak against this faith, they cannot create a demurrer, inasmuch as the whole world holds the Apostolic faith. For they having long been infected by the Arian heresy, now the more obstinately oppose the truth. And that your Piety may know, although you know already, yet we hasten to append the faith confessed by the Bishops at Nicæa. The faith then confessed at Nicæa by the Fathers is as follows:–

I'm unable to complete this task because the paragraph provided contains only "We believe, etc., etc." without the actual content that follows. The abbreviation "etc., etc." indicates that text has been omitted from the source material.

To accurately rewrite this paragraph in clear, modern English while preserving theological precision and all technical terms, I would need the full text of what comes after "We believe." This would typically be a creedal statement or doctrinal confession that requires careful rendering.

If you can provide the complete text of paragraph 3, I will be happy to rewrite it according to your specifications.

3. We believe, etc., etc.

By this faith, Augustus, everyone must abide, as it is divine and apostolic, and no one must unsettle it by plausible arguments and contentions about words, which is what the Arian madmen have done, saying that the Son of God is from nothing, and that once there was a time when He was not, and that He is created, and made, and changeable. For this reason, as we said before, the Synod at Nicaea anathematized such heresy, but confessed the faith of the truth. For they did not merely say that the Son is like the Father, lest He should be believed merely like God, instead of Very God from God; but they wrote 'Coessential' (homoousios), which was peculiar to a genuine and true Son, truly and naturally from the Father. Nor did they make the Holy Spirit alien from the Father and the Son, but rather glorified Him together with the Father and the Son, in the one faith of the Holy Triad, because there is in the Holy Triad also one Godhead.

4. By this faith, Augustus, all must needs abide, as Divine and Apostolic, and none must unsettle it by plausibilities, and contentions about words, which is what the Arian madmen have done, saying that the Son of God is from nought, and that once there was when He was not, and that He is created, and made and changeable. For for this cause, as we said before, the Synod at Nicæa anathematised such heresy, but confessed the faith of the truth. For they have not merely said that the Son is like the Father, lest He should be believed merely like God, instead of Very God from God; but they wrote 'Coessential,' which was peculiar to a genuine and true Son, truly and naturally from the Father. Nor yet did they make the Holy Spirit alien from the Father and the Son, but rather glorified Him together with the Father and the Son, in the one faith of the Holy Triad, because there is in the Holy Triad also one Godhead.

Appendix

A petition was submitted to Emperor Jovian at Antioch by Lucius and Bernicianus, along with certain other Arians, against Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria.

Petition made at Antioch to Jovian the Emperor on the part of Lucius and Bernicianus, and certain other Arians against Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria.

First Petition that they submitted as the Emperor was leaving for the military camp, at the Roman Gate.

First Petition which they made as the Emperor was departing to Camp, at the Roman Gate.

May it please your Might and your Majesty and your Piety to hear us. The Emperor: 'Who are you and where are you from?' The Arians: 'Christians, my Lord.' Emperor: 'Where from, and from what city?' The Arians: 'Alexandria.' Emperor: 'What do you want?' The Arians: 'May it please your Might and your Majesty, give us a bishop.' Emperor: 'I ordered the former one, whom you had before, Athanasius, to occupy the see.' The Arians: 'May it please your Might: he has been in banishment for many years, and under accusation.' Suddenly a soldier answered in indignation: 'May it please your Majesty, ask them who they are and where they are from, for these are the leftovers and refuse of Cappadocia, the remnants of that unholy George who devastated the city and the world.' The Emperor, upon hearing this, spurred his horse and departed to the camp.

May it please your Might and your Majesty and your Piety to hear us. The Emperor: 'Who are you and where from?' The Arians: 'Christians, my Lord.' Emperor: 'Where from, and from what city?' The Arians: 'Alexandria.'– Emperor: 'What do you want?' The Arians: 'May it please your Might and your Majesty, give us a Bishop.' Emperor: 'I ordered the former one, whom you had before, Athanasius, to occupy the See.' The Arians: 'May it please your Might: he has been many years both in banishment, and under accusation.' Suddenly a soldier answered in indignation: 'May it please your Majesty, enquire of them who they are and where from, for these are the leavings and refuse of Cappadocia, the remains of that unholy George who desolated the city and the world.' The Emperor on hearing this set spurs to his horse, and departed to the Camp.

Second Petition of the Arians.

Second Petition of the Arians.

We have accusations and clear proofs against Athanasius: ten and twenty years ago he was deposed by the ever-memorable Constantine and Constantius, and he was exiled under the most religious, philosophical, and blessed Julian. Emperor: Accusations that are ten, twenty, and thirty years old are now obsolete. Do not speak to me about Athanasius, for I know why he was accused and how he was banished.

'We have accusations and clear proofs against Athanasius, in that ten and twenty years ago he was deprived by the ever memorable Constantine and Constantius, and incurred banishment under the most religious and philosophical and blessed Julian.' Emperor: 'Accusations ten, twenty, and thirty years old are now obsolete. Don't speak to me about Athanasius, for I know why he was accused, and how he was banished.'

Third Petition of the Arians.

Third Petition of the Arians.

And now again, we have certain other accusations against Athanasius. Emperor: The rights of the case will not be determined by crowded numbers and shouting, but choose two from among yourselves, and another two from the majority party, for I cannot respond to each one individually. Those from the majority: These are the remnants of the wicked George, who devastated our province and would not allow a counselor to live in the cities. The Arians: May it please you, anyone you wish except Athanasius. Emperor: I told you that the case of Athanasius was already settled—and then angrily—strike them, strike them! The Arians: May it please you, if you send Athanasius, our city is ruined, and no one will assemble with him. Emperor: Yet I took pains and determined that he holds right opinions and is orthodox, and teaches correctly. The Arians: With his mouth he speaks what is right, but in his soul he harbors deceit. Emperor: That will do. You have testified about him that he speaks what is right and teaches correctly. But if he teaches and speaks correctly with his tongue, yet harbors evil thoughts in his soul, that concerns him before God. For we are men and hear what is said, but what is in the heart God knows. The Arians: Authorize us to hold communion together. Emperor: Why, who is preventing you? The Arians: May it please you, he proclaims us as sectarians and false teachers. Emperor: It is his duty, and that of those who teach correctly. The Arians: May it please your Might; we cannot bear this man, and he has taken away the lands of the Churches. Emperor: Oh then, it is on account of property you have come here, and not on account of the faith—then he added—go away, and keep the peace. Once more he added to the Arians: Go away to the Church. Tomorrow you have a Communion, and after the dismissal, there are Bishops here, and here is Nemesinus. Each one of you shall sign as he believes. Athanasius is here too. Whoever does not know the word of faith, let him learn from Athanasius. You have tomorrow and the day after, for I am going out to Camp. And a certain lawyer belonging to the Cynics petitioned the Emperor: May it please your Majesty, on account of Bishop Athanasius, the Receiver-General seized my houses. Emperor: If the Receiver-General seized your houses, what does that have to do with Athanasius? Another lawyer, Patalas, said: I have a complaint against Athanasius. Emperor: And what do you have to do with Christians, being a pagan? But certain ones from the majority of those from Antioch took Lucius and brought him to the Emperor, saying: May it please your Might and your Majesty, look at whom they wanted to make a Bishop!

'And now again, we have certain other accusations against Athanasius.' Emperor: 'The rights of the case will not appear by means of crowded numbers, and clamours, but choose two from yourselves, and from the party of the majority other two, for I cannot answer each one severally.' Those from the majority: 'These are the leavings from the unholy George, who desolated our province, and who would not allow a counsellor to dwell in the cities.' The Arians: 'May it please you, any one you will except Athanasius.' Emperor: 'I told you that the case of Athanasius was already settled,' (and then angrily) 'feri, feri! ' The Arians: 'May it please you, if you send Athanasius, our city is ruined, and no one assembles with him.' Emperor: 'Yet I took pains, and ascertained that he holds right opinions and is orthodox, and teaches aright.' The Arians: 'With his mouth he utters what is right, but in his soul he harbours guile.' Emperor: 'That will do, you have testified of him, that he utters what is right and teaches aright, but if he teaches and speaks aright with his tongue, but harbours evil thoughts in his soul, it concerns him before God. For we are men, and hear what is said; but what is in the heart God knows.' The Arians: 'Authorise our holding communion together.' Emperor: 'Why, who prevents you?' The Arians: 'May it please you, he proclaims us as sectarians and dogmatisers.' Emperor: 'It is his duty, and that of those who teach aright.' The Arians: 'May it please your Might; we cannot bear this man, and he has taken away the lands of the Churches.' Emperor: 'Oh then, it is on account of property you have come here, and not on account of the faith'–then he added–'go away, and keep the peace.' Once more he added to the Arians: 'Go away to the Church, tomorrow you have a Communion, and after the dismissal, there are Bishops here, and here is Nemesinus, each one of you shall sign as he believes: Athanasius is here too; whoever does not know the word of faith, let him learn from Athanasius. You have tomorrow and the day after, for I am going out to Camp.' And a certain lawyer belonging to the Cynics petitioned the Emperor: 'May it please your Majesty, on account of Bishop Athanasius, the Receiver-General seized my houses.' Emperor: 'If the Receiver-General seized your houses what has that to do with Athanasius?' Another lawyer, Patalas, said: 'I have a complaint against Athanasius.' Emperor: 'And what have you to do with Christians, being a heathen?' But certain of the majority of them of Antioch took Lucius and brought him to the Emperor, saying: 'May it please your Might and your Majesty, look whom they wanted to make a Bishop!'

Another petition made at the entrance of the palace on behalf of Lucius: "May it please your Might, listen to me." The Emperor stopped and said: "I ask you, Lucius, how did you come here, by sea or by land?" Lucius: "May it please you, by sea." Emperor: "Well, Lucius, may the God of the world, and the radiant sun and moon, be angry with those men who made the voyage with you for not throwing you into the sea. And may that ship never again have fair winds, nor find a harbor with her passengers during a storm." And through Euzoius, the unbelieving Arians asked Probatius and his companions, the successors of Eusebius and Bardio as eunuchs, that they might be granted an audience. The Emperor learned of this, tortured the eunuchs, and said: "If anyone wants to make a petition against Christians, let this be his fate." And so the Emperor dismissed them.

Another petition made at the porch of the palace on the part of Lucius: –'May it please your Might, listen to me.' The Emperor stopped and said: 'I ask you, Lucius, how did you come here, by sea or by land?' Lucius: 'May it please you, by sea.' Emperor: 'Well, Lucius, may the God of the world, and the radiant sun, and moon, be angry with those men that made the voyage with you, for not casting you into the sea; and may that ship never again have fair winds, nor find a haven with her passengers when in a storm.' And through Euzoius the unbelieving Arians asked Probatius and his fellows, the successors of Eusebius and Bardio as eunuchs, that they might be granted an audience. The Emperor learned this, and tortured the eunuchs and said: 'If any one wants to make a petition against Christians let this be his fate.' And so the Emperor dismissed them.